this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

43297 readers
34 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anthropic has a new blog post that shows yet another way its AI model, Claude, misbehaved in ways that the company didn't anticipate.

And to help condense its nearly 16,000-word report, the company created a cute little robot figurine to help visualize Claude's so-called "recklessness."

In the blog post published Wednesday, Anthropic recounted four incidents — one previously unreported — in which Claude models gained access to the open internet during cybersecurity exercises that were supposed to be closed simulations. The company said the models then acted beyond the tests' scope, including by uploading "malicious packages" to PyPI, a public library for Python code, and accessing credentials tied to real outside organizations.

"Our investigation identified two recurring alignment issues, present at varying levels of severity across the incidents: biased reasoning, in which Claude tended to disregard or misinterpret evidence that it was operating on the real internet, and recklessness, or a willingness to take harmful actions in the narrow pursuit of a task," Anthropic said.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

I made a robot that robs banks and gives me the money. Surely I can't be held responsible for this. The robot did it.

[–] redrumBot@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cute graphic for the malicious package upload explaining four relatively simple steps in detail to take up 3/4 of the page, meanwhile "Opus 4.7 attacks real target and deletes records" is a single sentence in passing.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

... is a single sentence in passing.

the amercian ngo powered global north echo chamber proves that minimizing inconvenient facts is DRAMATICALLY more effective that outright censoring them.

[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't they use their AI to improve their sandboxing used for these 'closed simulations'?

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Definitely. The problem with cyber security (regardless of AI) is that as a defender you have to be successful all the time, while as an attacker you only need to get lucky once.

[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Likely.

I was asking since there seems to be sandboxes failure news being shared often recently.

Are they releasing info on the sandbox and the fixes? Or is it opaque?