this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
430 points (98.0% liked)

Television

3098 readers
459 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Listen to me, all your series are shit anyway. I stopped counting how many shows I gave a try because someone told that this one was dope. I'm amazed by what people find so cool. The one with the doctor? Lame. The one with the professor who cooks drugs? Maybe two half good ideas and then pfff ten seasons of crap on autopilot. Etcetera, etcetera

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

The only good one I've seen so far is "The Wire". Almost all the rest of it was not only less good but bad. I remember towards the beginning of this trend, everybody was watching "Lost", 15 years later or so I watched the first episode. It was so intellectually indigent that I really can't get why it had been such a success. I mean, it really sucks! Or the problem is me at parties, all that?

E'd some typos

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

also cancelling seasons after 2 or 3. and haivng only 8-10 episodes which is pathetically small, and is a penny pinching method by streaming companies, they want to avoid paying ACTORS "exorbitant" amount of sums of money.

sandman and Invicible between the 1st-2nd season was abysmally long like 3years. it doesnt take 3 years to make 8 episodes at all.

similarly with orville 6 year and only handful of episodes, one of the leads said it was unaffordable for most people working on the show, to have so long of hiatus. although pallacki said it partially due to mcfarlane writing all of the epsiodes himself.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Re The Orville,

As I understand he's now at least written all the episodes for the next season, now it's just a matter of getting everything together (the equally hard part).

I thought he would stick with The Orville on a regular basis, but maybe once you achieve your dream it's easy to start looking at other projects.

Paramount called his bluff on the Ted live action series (he would only do it if they could have movie level budget for CGI Ted, and they did, for two seasons at least). So I think he jumped at that since it seemed like a limited time offer.

Plus now he's diving back into animation with a Stewie spin-off show and a Ted animated show.

I do hope we get Orville season 4 someday, especially with Star Trek coming to an end (for now).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

All the shows I am currently into are technically still around; but they haven't put out an episode for several years now. By the time they do release something, I'll have fucking forgot about it. But they'll also only put out 6 fuckin' episodes which leads me to wonder what the hell was going on that whole time? There's no way it took 3 years to film 6 fucking episodes of a show that is just people talking in the same location every time.

[–] berrodeguarana@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 1 day ago

Animes are way ahead in this department. They have been releasing those recap episodes for a long time.

On a personal note though, I avoid ongoing works like the plague, because you never know when you are gonna get hooked on a series that stays on a cliffhanger for like 10 years and yes, AoT, I'm looking at you.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

I can't speak to the specific show you were thinking of, but it definitely could take that long. TV shows used to be leaner and lower budget, because they had such a fast pace. Nowadays each episode is not far off from a feature film on polish and sometimes length. If each episode is an hour, a 6 episode series is practically 3 feature films-worth of work.

I'd love to see shows go back to that old model of quicker runs with leaner budgets and less fx reliance. Not saying all shows should be that way, but it would be nice to have a mix.

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 112 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Did people pay to investigate that? Because, uh, fucking duh

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I saw a study the other day explaining that people that learned how to swim at some point in their life are statistically less likely to drown.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Literally all you had to do was go to a Stranger Things subreddit/facebook group literally any time between seasons (2-3, etc.) and you'd have novellas-worth of proof.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 22 points 2 days ago

I'm guessing the investigation was to determine how strong the effect is, to see how much money is worth spending to avoid the issue?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

People move on. Old data proved this decades ago but in the digital world, everything is new again.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 98 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They also lose viewership when jacking prices or repeatedly canceling series.
I basically won't start a series that hasn't ended because I got tired of getting invested into something that gets botched or canceled.

[–] AfterlifeAdventures@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget the commercials, arhhh ye land lovers

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know it doesn't really matter, but it is landlubber. A lubber is someone who is awkward or clumsy. So a landlubber was someone who was awkward on a ship because they weren't accustomed to the sea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pepperidge farm remembers when a 'season' was more than 8 40-min episodes.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

more than 8 episodes. started in september ended around may. so like around 25 episodes. just give me 25 episodes every year of something like tv shows used to be. new season every year. it shouldn't be hard we had that for years before netflix.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

On the one hand, broadcast TV typically had 20-26 episode seasons every year. On the other hand, this often included a lot of filler and could easily lead to huge compromises to get everything done. There will always be trade offs between quantity and quality, and only one of those is contractually obligated.

That being said, I really hate the way streaming has devolved into shows with 8 episodes or less in a season, with some of those episodes being significantly shorter than others, and all of them paced as though they have all the time in the world despite the season being over. That would be awful even if they did release seasons annually and never cancelled things early.

I feel like we figured out the perfect balance with Daredevil season 1. Thirteen really solid episodes, each being exactly as long as they need to be to tell the story they want, and all of them adding up to complete the arc for the season. I could nitpick and criticize some things, but the pacing was absolutely perfect.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Filler or not people felt like they had a relationship with the characters. Now everything is so short and releases so long in between people don't have that.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago

Being able to binge watch an entire season in one 8-hour workday you've decided to slack off on, is a bit too short. It's what used to be called miniseries.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago

My favorite genre of data science is "Fucking Duh."

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Presumably thats why Silo shot season 3 and 4 back-to-back, and is releasing season 4 about 9-10 months after season 3 ended, as opposed to the 2 years that most streaming shows put between seasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well yeah. Turns out putting out a season every year was the best way to keep people invested in your show

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obsolete@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Myth confirmed.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Netflix has no idea or confidence in how to evaluate what a good show is, so they have to wait for user data to tell them.

But of course their shit tier layout makes 80% of their catalogue hard to find, so unless they're really pushing a show a production can easily fall through the cracks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe Netflix can commission a study to investigate whether viewers are put off by most of their shows being not very good. They might learn something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Netflix will use this as an excuse to push more ai slop so they can release seasons faster.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder whether a continuous format would work for modern shows. Like 1 every months. Could develop interesting watching culture if done well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still haven’t forgiven them for canceling “Kaos”.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

It seems almost everybody is pissed off at them for cancelling something. It's not a novel thing to say at this point, but I don't bother with their originals any more.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

What is the reason for the long waits anyway? Especially considering that actual runtime of an average season nowadays is 50% or less than what it used to be.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Broadcast/cable TV had a schedule to fill. More than anything else, they needed to fill time slots. They planned around a calendar so annual seasons were only natural. That's also why they tended to have longer seasons, because it's easier to keep viewers coming back on schedule when they are already interested in a show. Plus it's cheaper to to make one long show than two short shows. It leads to brutal production schedules and massive creative compromises, but it fills airtime and that's what counts.

In other words, the economics of old school TV were about filling time while maximizing ratings and minimizing costs, which incentivizes making a smaller number of shows with longer seasons and regular releases.

Streaming has very different incentives. They don't care about filling a schedule, they just want you to subscribe. Every new show is a potential draw, and the more titles they have the more likely it is that one of them will appeal to you. They are incentivized to fill their catalog, not their calendar. As such, there's nowhere near as much pressure to churn out seasons like clockwork. If anything, they probably get more bang for their buck by waiting longer between seasons so that the release of each season is more of an event.

Hell, it doesn't even matter that much if it hurts the show in the long run. As long as they keep getting subscribers and have new shows (or popular old shows) to pull people in, they don't really care if an existing show dies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›