this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
499 points (97.2% liked)

memes

22635 readers
2409 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
499
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by capcool@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

At this point, Its a possibility. Maybe corporates don’t want humans to be intelligent enough to fight with AI like in Terminator. So they are making people forget coding and stuffs in the name of assisting and made us lazy to prevent AI ig.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"The 600 series used em-dashes, we spotted 'em easy..."

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"that was when they still used central processing", still had something to aim at."

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This sounds so much like an authentic quote, but you wrote it right? I believed it until I just wanted to requote it myself and couldn't find it.
Well done
(I'll requote it anyway ofc, just now know it's yours not the movie's)

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Please... the thought that a super intelligent A.I.'s best idea for human annihilation is to make robot men instead of creating a super virus is laughable. It's a nice fairytale to think we'll actually stand a chance at fighting back against our demise though.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

A supervirus would make a very depressing film

It’s a nice fairytale to think we’ll actually stand a chance at fighting back against our demise though.

China's in the race to dominate the, "non-human market," by 2027.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

AGI is not coming out anytime soon, and LLM's aren't that competent.

Quit advertising for the AI companies for free

LLM’s aren’t that competent.

Which is why people are able to mess with them and make viruses.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

It doesn't have to? Somebody just needs to use it to bio engineer a virus so powerful we get wiped out.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that these techno-feudalists don't understand the tech themselves.

They have fed themselves the same lies and now believe in it. Worse, is that since these LLMs are commodities, that means they will always appease even at the expense of safety.

The technology is the Mirror Mirror On The Wall from Snow White, but lobotmised. The Mirror almost always spoke the truth, but these LLMs don't.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When a ceo or exec or whatever assigns a task or something to someone, they go off and do it and come back with a result, doesn’t matter if it’s right or wrong.

It doesn’t matter if it involves 1000 people and years of work, it’s the same with a few status meetings along the way.

When AI comes along, it’s the same thing, but faster. Sure it can be wrong, but so can humans, so who really cares? All they see is same result, but faster.

I think that’s where the AI craze comes from. Executives don’t see people as real, they see them as agents and human agents cost more than AI.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

except, you know, turns out those cost savings don't actually exist and humans are, in fact, cheaper...

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Where do you see yourself in five years?"

"I don't."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago

"In a firing squad. I just don't know which side I'll be on."

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 9 points 2 days ago
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

I'm more of a Matrix believer.

I hope I get a nice pod with views over the human farms.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The machines hypothetically driving that robot are huge installations that require vast unguarded infrastructure to operate.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One thing that has always bothered me about Terminator. Why would Skynet put the "brain" in the thing's head? It's the least armored part of the robot. It would make more sense to put the processor in the torso where it would be much harder to damage. It's not like terminators are limited by signal time across biological neurons, which is why animals have the brain near the sense organs. Transmission times from eyes in the head to a brain in the torso along fiber-optic lines would be irrelevant.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You make a good point, however you need to remember that the power system, both power storage and motors, need to go somewhere.

I could easily argue that the power storage is just as critical a part as the central processing unit, but takes up a lot more space. So why not put the CPU in a hardened "head", and the battery pack in the torso?

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The brain isnt in the head, but the modem is...

[–] avocado@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Nah we'll be the ones to die first

[–] MasutaHarada@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago

Whoever want to be john connor, and sarah connor , please by any mean do your things asap, before it's too late.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Forcing clankers into good christian missonary at gunpoint?