Remember this is the same guy that has increased the price on vehicles people didn’t yet receive but already paid for. He asked people to pay more for already purchased vehicles they have not received.

If someone bought a cyber-truck without the Grock, they bought it as it was. Shoving Grock down the consumers' throats without their consent would constitute a material alteration of tge car that was originally bought. This would then constitute graffiti.

Edit: if the vehicle had not been fully purchased and paid, this would be potential grounds for a refund because the material alteration of the good would make the contract for the sale of the vehicle voidable.

Hey Tesl-errr, I mean, Grok.

Yes, fräulein

Uh... read me a story

Certainly

The function of propaganda does not lie in the scientific training of the individual, but in calling the masses' attention to certain facts, processes, necessities, etc-

What does this even mean? If you have a phone in your tesla, you already have grok in a tesla vehicle. Amazing how the Media-Tesla-hype complex works.

That is how he decided it's had enough time in the oven

I can't even get a PRD approved in a week...

Saving the environment with electric car to later add an energy guzzling racist chat bot to the front panel. /nottheonion?

If Grok is targeting Jews or any specific ethnicity, maybe not let it out in the road?

If it just runs over people by random, well that's a different matter.

Cars?

Oh, you mean nazi buckets?

Your car’s AI will be telling you to drive off a bridge next.

My dad fsr wont ever unlease his tesla, he doesnt care

I think it is a brilliant idea for Swasticar owners - it will drive over/eliminate everyone with darker skin without driver input!