this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
300 points (97.5% liked)

memes

22760 readers
2240 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Fold tech still ain't there. Especially with regards to durability. But that's part of the point, they need you to replace your phone on the regular.

[–] TheShamMirrors@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My inner screen finally broke a couple months ago. It is pretty scammy but it seems to have lasted a while. I'm curious how long the rest of the phone is going to last in this state because I'm not shelling out for repairs on a phone I bought second hand

[–] simpliston@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

How long have you had it? Mine got little fractures along the fold crease after about 2.5-3 years of use

[–] aeiou@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, the fold part has been durable for me, despite me constantly dropping it. Did manage to crack the non-fold screen though.

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, I've had two Razrs now. First one the outer screen died from a fall - it was the traditional style screen that wasn't durable.

Maybe it's worse on Pixels or Samsungs, but my anecdotal experience has been that the inner flexible screen has been better than the outer one.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

New phone comes out (this case I-phone) then the first week is tech youtubers start glacing it to no ends (because money) & than the second or third week it's all about testing the phones durability.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Monster96@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, that is the question

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, thanks mate.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

YouTubers like to do live durability tests on new phones when released (think dropping from a table / hand height / etc).

Eventually most move to just “what would it take to break the phone entirely”?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I like the idea of fold tech but I just wish it unfolded to a proper aspect ratio.

Imagine an iPhone that unfolds into an iPad.

Edit: just looked it up, it’s 4:3, which is not bad but imo it’s also not good

[–] f314@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It is literally the aspect ratio of every iPad, though 😅

Something like 16:10 or 16:9 would make it very square when folded. IMO the most satisfying aspect ratio would be √2:1, like A4 paper, so that the aspect ratio when closed and open is the same.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

It is actually closer to √ 2 as it’s stated as 1.4:1 on both screens, so slightly wider than iPad unfolded

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Well shit that shows how little I know about tablets

You know, I hope this becomes something people like, cause why not, we need some tech wins these days.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

iPhone Duo literally has an aspect ratio of 1.4:1 (√2:1) both when closed and open.

[–] f314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Awesome! I just assumed OP was right when they said 4:3 😅 But 1.4:1 makes much more sense for the form factor.

[–] sompreno@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem with that is that nobody wants an 8:9 screen for the folded in form factor

[–] ElderReflections@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, give me a long boi 16:5

[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm the kind of contrarian who thinks we should have stuck with 4:3 in general, it's a better framing for a lot of content and it also makes the vertical video problem a lot less annoying in my view.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

Meanwhile I switched to ultrawide

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the durability is the limiting factor in regards to foldable tech as it stands right now

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also, they are worse phones. The flip style makes more sense as a foldable. I don't think there will ever be much market for them.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Something I keep hearing from others and think that myself - once you go foldable, you don't want to go back. I don't think I'll ever buy a non-foldable again.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe when they are cheap and durable, but until then, completely off the table for >99% of the market. But as they are right now, there will just be a niche.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Forget the hammer, I want the hydraulic press

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

New meaning for "apple crusher 5 million"

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I absolutely read your comment with a Finnish accent.

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Kinda insane that you can make 2 grand with a video smashing a phone

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Was hoping for something like this.