this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
239 points (96.5% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7354 readers
39 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 103 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump: *shoots America with tariffs*

MAGA: why didn't the liberal minority in Congress stop this?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand that this is sarcasm.

But you just watched Democrats hand over their best leverage by opting not to shut down Donald's government and voting with Republicans, so, they're not entirely wrong. We don't have legitimate opposition. We have a minority party performatively putting up a false pretense at opposition, sitting back, and watching their stock portfolios soar.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

by opting not to shut down Donald’s government and voting with Republicans

What are you talking about? Are you talking about a specific bill? Which one? All Dems voted against the 'huge hideous bill' (budget bill). Dems don't have the power/votes to 'shut down Donald's government'.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Pay attention.

Can't pass a regressive tax bill if the government shuts down.

Democrats aren't powerless. They're complicit. The BBB was only possible because they made it possible.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok. You said "But you just watched", so I thought you were talking about the most recent catastrophic legislation, which is why I asked which bill you were talking about. Schumer's a cowardly piece of shit and could have used the only chance dems had or will have, because the other cowardly pieces of shit would have followed his lead and voted against it if he would have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So sick of conservatives breaking shit like children and then demanding liberals clean it up.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

So sick of conservatives breaking shit like children and then demanding liberals clean it up.

So sick of the stupids breaking shit like children and then demanding normal people clean it up.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago

"I keep punching myself in the face! Why is Joe biden not stopping me!?"

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Link to the replies to the removed comment:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250713072842/https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1ly12mh/trump_announces_30_tariffs_on_mexico_eu_starting/n2qg7u1/?context=3


The user in question tries to educate another user.

Transcript:

Post Title: Trump announces 30% tariffs on Mexico, EU starting August 1st

Comments:

agk927 Moderate Conservative -189 points 17 hours ago

It'll make us some money. I see no issue here

akbuilderthrowaway Heinlein 415 points 16 hours ago

... you do realize Americans pay the tax, right? This is a consumption tax on American for foreign goods. Other nations are not paying this tax. You are. This is a tax on Americans.

agk927 Moderate Conservative -280 points 16 hours ago

He wouldn't do it if it hurt us. Keep listening to the misinformation. There's 2 sides to every story

akbuilderthrowaway Heinlein 321 points 16 hours ago

Misinformation? Dude. Seriously. Open your fucking eyes. Importers aren't going to eat 25+% taxes out of the goodness of their hearts. It's going to get passed on to consumers.

I can call a spade a spade. Trump's tariff policy is awful. You can't, on one hand, spout out rhetoric about lowering taxes and then pull shit like this.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 week ago

He wouldn’t do it if it hurt us

lol

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i work for an importer. My family are all college educated. I still have to explain this to people who have business degrees who should know better. The single most important thing I do at work is make sure the taxes and tariffs are paid before the shipping container gets released from the ship.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is there any substantial decline in the imports in the last 6 months?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

not the same person but i work in TLSC - variously, yes, in general people are doing feast and famine to import when tariffs get paused, and don't when they're not

load more comments (3 replies)

Yea, I work in booze importing so we have been hit hard as many are giving up drinking (not criticizing that choice only stating a fact) and many others can no longer afford alcohol regularly.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I often think the world does not need more people with MBA's.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

Self aware wolf

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Im hearing: The other political party needs to stop our party, its being crazy ... this is why we did not vote for the other political party, so they can save us ... or something.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm hearing "holy shit, how are those dipshits so ineffectual? Why dont they use any of their power when they're the minority like mine does?".

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The answer is SCOTUS is compromised. They will favour GOP every time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty sure he's doing tariffs specifically because they aren't a tax. They aren't collected by the IRS, they're collected by Customs and Border Protection, which is a division of the Dept. of Homeland Security (just like ICE). And because the head of the DHS is such a loyal stooge, whatever god-king shitstain says goes

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it comes down to 2 parts, one being that tarrifs is what were used prior to income tax in the U.S., the time when "robber barrons" thrived and could grow their wealth easily. So the heritage foundation is trying to drive down income taxes and reintroduce tarrifs so they can legally make as much money as possible while not having that money they pull in pay for America's well being. The second I believe is that the money starts in a separate pile, and ultimately goes to the treasury still, but previously since that "pile" had far less in it before it will look like the government is collecting a lot more money when directly comparing that pile to that pile over than last 50 years. So he can say he increased our revenue by bolognanumber% to show he is doing well, while ignoring that higher costs decreased purchases which in turn decrease states income from sales taxes. So states will make less, and be more dependent on the federal government. Which if the states don't fall in line, the federal government can/will disperse funds unevenly to states who don't lap the federal governments balls.

So it comes to a game of taking from the working class and states money/rights as much as possible to keep them fully dependent while growing insanely rich, but not pissed off enough to rebel, or if they do.. not have enough resources to be able too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Letting Trump run the country into the ground is the best way to get rid of the MAGAzis.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

No, because they'll immediately vote conservative the next chance they get anyway.

No amount of suffering will cure the vast majority of these people. They will be licking the boot even as it crushes their skull in their final moments.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The billionaire disease remains, though.

Accelerationism has never proven to be an effective means of combatting conservatism.

[–] msfroh@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ooh! There was an episode of the Past, Present, Future podcast a couple of months ago that touched on this very subject. Tariff policy was set by congress up until the Smoot-Hawley act, which was considered such garbage that they decided that it should be left to the executive.

Back when it was a congressional power, it was also the source of some of the worst horse-trading, as representatives from rural areas would seek protection on agricultural imports (with low tariffs on imported machinery), while representatives from manufacturing areas would seek to lower food prices and increase the cost of imported manufactured goods.

Edit: Not saying that handing it to the executive is the best plan, as we can see by what's going on now, but letting congress do it was also problematic. It's funny how a lot of us grew up with the idea that no/low tariffs are the natural order, when it's actually been a fairly short-lived anomaly in historical terms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The convoluted hill these morons made for themselves has actually been really satisfying. I hate these people and it’s good to know that it’s nothing but a total fucking mess inside their dumb little heads

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even the MAGAs are frustrated with democrats doing NOTHING. Even they know this is bullshit!

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What could they realistically do, when Trump controls all branches of government from Congress to the Supreme Court? It can be argued that they should have shut down his government in March, when they had the chance to reject the spending bill - but what can they do now?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What could they realistically do

How many times have they filibustered actual legislation or appointees since trump took office?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Both conservatives and liberals don’t want people discussing how easily the Dems could put a stop to this, and that they’ve been covertly participating in all of it.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (34 children)

I'm neither but I'd love to hear how you believe Dems can put a stop to these tarrifs? It's either A. Presidential power (which I don't believe it is) or B. Congressional power (which is Republican majority)

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›