Benedict_Espinosa

joined 1 week ago
[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

True, but despite that it's not possible to tell him to fuck off either. Europe has no good options here.

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I do indeed, and I think that it's a remarkably disingenuous and biased take.

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A kind of computerised profascist authoritarian dystopia, a combination "1984" and "Brave New World" with technocratic oligarchy, total surveillance, killer robots and unsafe self-driving cars in the world increasingly subject to natural catastrophes due to steadily worsening climate change.

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Name a thing that is unbiased. It's generally significantly less biased than humans are.

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What could they realistically do, when Trump controls all branches of government from Congress to the Supreme Court? It can be argued that they should have shut down his government in March, when they had the chance to reject the spending bill - but what can they do now?

It's not generally a worse chatbot than others - that is, until Musk manages to ruin it completely.

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hence the updates. This is something that Musk has been trying to overturn for some time now.