this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
600 points (86.1% liked)

Technology

88221 readers
4987 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The platform says hackers targeted a firm that helped to verify the ages of its users.

From 2025.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I hope I never gave them that. I had Nitro for a bit, but I don't think I would have ever willingly gave them that.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 58 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

We told you this would happen. We told you this would be the result of "age verification". As usual, you fucking didn't listen.

I hope Discord is sued into receivership over this.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Something tells me they will not face any consequences.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

that's just a feeling, right? there's no prior experience that could trigger that, right? *nudge, nudge. wink, wink.*

Anyway, miraculously i haven't been hit with the age-wall yet, bur when i do, Discord will lose a user.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, it's a shame this didn't come 1-2 years earlier before discord got its claws in more stuff. Discord really caught on in my corners of the internet in the last 2 years. Before that, it was just my Minecraft pals. Even creators who freed themselves from the advertising machine by going fan-funded on Patron style sites still use discord to communicate. I hate to see them hit by boycott action against Discord, but if you stand on an archery range, don't be surprised when you have a bunch of arrows sticking out of your noggin. ¯\(ツ)/¯

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

I checked and both of my accounts are considered adult apparently, so hopefully they won't change that in the future for me and that will be the end of that for me.

[–] Killer@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Discord isn't the one that got hacked and leaked the info, it's whatever 3rd party they used.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Discord vetted and chose that vendor. They are liable, and as a corporate person, their corporate charter should be revoked until it has served 70,000 sentences of accessory to identity theft.

Unless we are a nation of cowards and weaklings of course. So who are we?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago

💯, absolutely agree. 3rd party or not it's completely irrelevant. That personal info is out in the wild and that is the point.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So so so so so misleading to post this when this will be interpreted as an event from 2026. Post should be removed IMO.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

There's a 2025 in the title

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I get that. I mean, that's how I knew to come down here and say that it was misleading. But surely we can agree it's strange to post something a year old on this particular community. especially something like this, that in context of what's been going on with Discord really makes it seem like fresh news. Like, the 2025 part is only needed because the post is misleading to begin with

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

But surely we can agree it's strange to post something a year old on this particular community. especially something like this, that in context of what's been going on with Discord really makes it seem like fresh news.

Now that Discord has begun rolling out the ID verification that they postponed a few months ago, I think it's a pretty important reminder. And as was said, the post title specifically says "(2025)"

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago

Hmmm yeah that's fair. I wasn't seeing it that way

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

Stop reading the details a knee jerk with the rest of us nerd

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Wao, again? The reasons why people keep using these bullshit services really make my mind spin. This is no different than people choosing to stay in a relationship with an abusing partner.

Edit: I just saw this is from last year's leak. Still, the likeness remains.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, there's no difference?

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

There's people whose lives are at risk if they leave Discord?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is no different than people choosing to stay in a relationship with an abusing partner.

I say that about Windows users who jump through hoops to try to disable the spying and they get mad at me, LOL.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 hours ago

As far as discord is concerned, I’m a proud citizen of Albania now. Much like Eric Adams.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Who could've seen that coming?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 hours ago

Certainly not anyone who objected to the practice.

[–] cotlovan@lemmy.world 60 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I thought that they were deleting the photos immediately after verification. They didn't??? Why aren't these companies being investigated and punished?

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.pub 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is from the leak last year. What leaked was pictures uploaded to their ticket system to appeal the result of a failed verification.

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

...so you are saying their verification process is so broken that hundreds of thousands of people had to appeal a false reading. Broken and insecure, what a look.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

It depends on the ratio of failed to successful, really. If there are hundreds of millions of successful verifications, that's a fairly low failure rate.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

Because money. We'll soon have to take things into our own hands, as the establishment only protects itself, and not us plebs.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago

Why? For example, XING just got sold and with it all personal information. This is why they didn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Wow, and now they want to relay your info through 2 or 3 parties for verications.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How am I just now hearing about this?

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Right? I didnt know about it.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 56 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad you added from 2025 there because otherwise it would have been super deceptive.

I definitely thought it happened again, and I was gonna be like, well that was fast. Like we all know it's going to happen again, but that would have been extremely fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 220 points 1 day ago (13 children)

This is old news. It didn't happen a second time.

[–] Sebeck012@feddit.nl 13 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, they've changed. This time they'll keep the data safe, for realsies, pinky promise. Im sure they even gave their employees a stern talking to!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Scaramanga@thelemmy.club 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Now more than ever is the time to have a secondary ID. These hacks and data leaks are getting out of hand.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Scaramanga@thelemmy.club 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A grade A scannable ID, usually a driving license. It looks like you, but isn't you. Perfect for age verification and all this other nonsense they want us to do.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Where would one get this? Dark web?

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 73 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

This article is dated "9 October 2025" which would make it almost a year old.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of adults don't even have a valid ID in the US.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago

Well now there should be plenty for them to buy on the black market if they don't want their own ;p

load more comments
view more: next ›