this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
291 points (92.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41980 readers
4515 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fire in the hole!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigGovernment@lemmy.world 3 points 15 minutes ago

The simplest answer, real world LLMs and AI are real, and holodecks are fictional. Plenty of things are cool in fiction and not something we should actually build.

See the classic tweet about the Torment Nexus.

Star Trek's universe: Federation citizens live in essentially zero scarcity where labor is optional and people can dedicate their lives to basically anything they like that this within their capabilities.

Star Trek's AI: A typically flawless tool (when the plot doesn't require an incident), optionally used by the individual, to perform complex calculations, simulations or provide immersion entertainment, complimenting whatever task needs done.

Our universe: We live in a capitalist society where the survival of 95% of the population requires them to sell their labor, where the majority of the population works in any job(s) they can get to make ends meet, where working in a creative or intellectually fulfilling field is a rare blessing and prohibitive to most, where your capitalist overlords claim the majority of your productivity for themselves and see the wages they do pay you as a burden to them that should be minimized regardless of your well-being.

Our AI: Devalues or replaces creative and intellectual roles. Forced down the throats of workers and consumers. Used to collectively monitor everyone. Used to push more wealth to a concentrated few. Notably and constantly unreliable while given unearned trust. Not actually intelligent, just good at specific kinds of prediction and parroting based on training from real works from real people that was stolen without the consent of the creators to be fed into the machines to be plagiarized on request. A genuine risk to the stability of our economy. A nightmare for the mental health of children and those vulnerable to delusions and/or thoughts of self-harm. Increasingly used to replace thought and skill development making us collectively dumber and more reliant on it.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

There's a handful of differences, I'll leave other point them out.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

Is there? It’s a machine, which learns and autonomously makes decisions based on that learning. It generates a scene.

I dunno, sounds like genAI to me, albeit a handful of generations down the line

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The difference is that Starfleet has the ethical standards in place to make that technology non disruptive to their society. We wouldn't survive being gifted ships that can glass the planet, for example. Wed fuck that up immediately.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What happens when they become real?

[–] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

I'll have been dead for about 8 million years

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 46 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a little more than just the genAI part tho.

You can fuck the holograms. If real world genAI was fuckable, FuckAI would not be an anti-AI community; it would be a NSFW one.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 hours ago (6 children)
[–] Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 hours ago

In universe the holodeck generates a certain kind of matter that can’t leave the holodeck. So your jizz goes into the holomatter lady who is then presumably disinterested atom by atom just like a teleporter. So your jizz gets dissolved into the ether.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Literally the first episode of Lower Decks has someone off-hand mention having to empty the holodeck cum trap.

Here.

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Into the biofilters until some poor lower deck person empties it:

[–] SpikedIguana@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Into the hussy

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 52 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Artificial intelligence in science fiction is intelligence that's artificial.

Artificial intelligence in real life is more akin to what we'd call "artificial flavors" in some fruit drink that contains 0% fruit. Isn't fruit, doesn't taste like fruit, but it's purple and sweet, so fuck it: "grape". We've accomplished the "artificial" part, but not the bit that actually matters.

So, yeah, AI in sci-fi is unironically great. "AI" irl is shit. If the real version ever comes close to the sci-fi version, you'll see a lot of the haters change our tune, but until then we'll call a turd a turd.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 31 points 11 hours ago

"Make an opponent capable of defeating Data"

ST AI: Have a supercharged Moriarty.

RL AI: deletes production database

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 121 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

If we got all the other socialist progressive benefits of the Star Trek universe, including no billionaires, then I think we'd be a lot less unhappy with generative AI as presented in that world.

How they built it, and what they plan to do with it is a pretty big part of the reason for our anger.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Exactly! I am not anti-ai. I am opposed to corporate controlled, massively polluting, unreliable slop engines that will be used to surveil us and take our jobs without benefitting us in any way.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 72 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, if we de-meme it and really want to define it, the difference is Star Trek is a post-scarcity world, so generative AI building things doesn't take anything away from human artists - it doesn't affect their livelihoods because their livelihoods are guaranteed.

As always...

[–] Grizzlybur@piefed.ca 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Plus I think it helps that much of what the holodeck recreates is centuries old at that point. 21st century earth, long ago. It’s not anyone’s current creations, and then beyond that it’s using data that the federation personally got by exploration. Like if people only used AI to generate medieval drawings I don’t think anyone would be too upset really. Maybe weirded out but not upset. Aside from the environmental concerns I guess.

however generating holo characters that look like your coworkers and doing weird stuff to them is a entirely canon issue. And Star Trek never touched on it, but wow would it be easy to fake footage of historical events in a holodeck, especially to civilizations without advanced technology. I work in history as my career and the amount of YouTube videos telling fake stories and showing fake footage of 20th century history is genuinely terrifying. I don’t know what the solution is. Digitization was meant to preserve historical footage but now it just makes it look just like the fake stuff. If anyone digitized historical footage and the physical no longer exists, verifying anything will become a nightmare and sometimes it would be strictly possible.

Honestly the more I think about the holodeck the more I think it’s dangerous as fuck, literally and socially, and Star Trek shows usually only very innocence uses for it. Like you thought parasocial relationships are bad now?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Some trekker should correct me here, or clarify, but I'm pretty sure that in TNG the character Barclay used the holodeck to treat his crippling social anxiety, which involved holos of his crewmates and got into some very awkward situations.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 47 minutes ago

Also Geordie falling in love with the holodeck version of a visiting researcher, Christy Henshaw in the episode "Booby Trap." She encounters her holodeck version swooning over Geordie and it weirds her out tremendously

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Actually Star Trek: Lower Decks covers the issue of using AI for nefarious purposes. In the series finale, an enemy Klingon superimposes video of a Starfleet admiral over herself making a message ordering the handover of a Klingon asylum seeker (second-in-command smells something fishy and hides the asylum seeker, until the video is confirmed a fake). Then in the comic Shaxs' Worst Day, the head security officer, Shaxs, uses the holodeck to recreate the bridge of a ship he just commandeered to pretend to be the captain he just killed while communicating with evil universe Starfleet command.

It should be noted that Lower Decks was made in the last decade, and not only incorporates a lot of contemporary social/technological issues and concerns, but also is a comedic reflection on the Star Trek franchise, and freely calls out things that have made fans go "huh?"

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago

Godamn Lower Decks really was the best Trek we had and they fucking cancelled it

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 30 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The Star Trek universe also seems to be able to run their AI without boiling the oceans.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 16 points 14 hours ago

Still requires boiling oceans, but they've found a few uninhabited water planets that can safely be boiled without bothering anybody.

(Also, our AI isn't even that good. They're not boiling the oceans. They're boiling what previous little fresh water we have that could be used for drinking or irrigation. It would be a lot less of a problem if they just built their cooling systems to deal with salt water and used seawater instead.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

Holodecks are discrete programs with subroutines.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago

Perhaps we give it a pass in a post-scarcity world? When capitalism isn't in the picture, it's not taking jobs or ruining the environment or anything like that.

Although, you kinda still have to "write" a holodeck program and it also seems to be slightly harder than prompting or they'd be doing it on the fly a bit more.

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 36 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Holodecks are generative AI that actually works.

  2. All LLMs are Generative AI, but not all Generative AIs are LLMs.

[–] restingOface@quokk.au 28 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Holodecks are generative AI that actually works.

They work until the plot dictates that they don't. Which happens a lot, actually.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't happen a lot.

Only they don't make episodes of the 99.99% of times they work perfectly.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If .01% of the time it creates a problem that kills someone or endangers the entire ship that seems like a lot to me for something that is used constantly by the entire crew.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

True.

Fortunately the .01% of the time there's an error, its incredibly minor.

[–] restingOface@quokk.au 1 points 59 minutes ago

Half of the holodeck malfunctions threaten the entire ship

[–] mossberg590@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

How many times did a bad "prompt" nearly destroy the Enterprise? Kill a crew member? Commit sexual harassment, for lack of a better term?

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Or create a fully sentient and conscious mind just because you asked it to? Jesus, holodecks are scary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›