But not all outcomes are equally likely. The probabilities is what matter in the end.
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
57 points (96.7% liked)
Showerthoughts
44196 readers
356 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
That's true. I suppose we build our environments and systems to alter those probabilities
We chose to accelerate climate change, pollute water sources, and take our anger out on each other as a human race, all at the same time
And not all failures are clearly absolute failures. It can be debatable. Some of them can also be beneficial in unexpected ways.
See also: Discovery of penicillin
This is a legitimate way to analyze things, and you're effectively analyzing the relative entropy of outcomes.
This is why for instance, strings will naturally tangle when exposed to random movement. There is a only a single configuration that is untangled and infinite tangled configurations, so given enough random energy will always tend towards a tangled outcome.
What about the N64 controllers when you and your buddies have been playing, correctly ordered p1-p4 to avoid tangles, and get called down to dinner. You come back and its just knots.
Quantum fairies or some shit idk
That's a little tiny Kirby in a captain falcon outfit that squeezes out of the rumble pack slot when you're not looking, just to fuck up your shit.
I can't say I've ever had that happen playing either 4 player N64 or Gamecube, and I've played a lot of both.
uhh i think that if the string is electrically charged, then the most straight-line, untangled state is the one with lowest potential energy, so that's what the string will develop into, in the long term.
You just discovered entropy!
This is why I hate linear planning. Pick an end goal and devise a process for approaching said goal. Correct the process as needed along the way.
Doesn't fit in a gant chart, though, so my boss never listens.
Business, especially big business, hates the idea of adaptive strategy. There is no guarantee you will achieve the goal, and no clear cost to do so. Small businesses, or businesses willing to take risks, will factor that in and sometimes get ahead because of it.
the thing is also that like 99% of small businesses that play risk like that fail. since the business is small, the cost of that is low. if the business is big, the cost of failing would be much higher.
Well, that's just plain statistics of entropy: if there are two possible outcomes, there is a 95% chance of it being the wrong outcome. :D
Throw in some Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is shit), and we are all running to stand still.
"for success to occur in a complex endeavor, all key factors must be present and work correctly. The endeavor does not succeed when even one essential element is missing, meaning there are many different ways to fail"
"Society is doomed for one very simple reason: it takes dozens of men working months with millions of dollars in material to build a building, but only one dumb-ass with a bomb to bring it down." – Jason Pargin, John Dies at the End
that and the fact that the world exists regardless continue to astonish me
Entropy, like dropping a box of spoons. But in your life you can just shift your view of what's right and wrong. People act like there's one right path - go to school, get a job, get married, have kids,... There are a billion right paths and you can choose any of them. And if you choose not to decide...
You still have made a choice 🎶🎵
A corollary to this thought is the so-called [persistent] "attacker's advantage": attackers need to do stuff just right only once to be successful, while the defender must do always, everything right to be successful at defending.
not if the defender fights back.
interestingly, almost all mutations are bad, but the fact that mutations exist is still the reason why life exists at all.
you could say that life developed through a series of what should have been mistakes, statistically speaking.
That's why learning on mistakes is a thing
I’m stuck in the definition of what is right and wrong?
Things don't actually go wrong they just don't go right.
The more general statement is it's harder to build something than it is to destroy it. There are limited paths that will reach a given goal, but nearly unlimited paths to undo that accomplishment.
Almost every mistake in history can be traced back to somebody abandoning reality in favor of their own.
Tangled Cord Theory
This is called Entropy
The specific type of entropy you’re describing is called “Social Entropy” but in all cases entropy is simply the fact that there are (usually) more disordered states for a system to be in than ordered ones. So if a system can undergo any sort of change, it is just generally more likely to become less-ordered than more-ordered.