this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
-37 points (8.9% liked)

Europe

12096 readers
966 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 44 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Just a friendly reminder that Politico is owned by the same guy who recently gave an award to Peter Thiel.

[–] UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Two things can be bad at the same time: Teams, Matrix both are terrible imo

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 9 points 6 hours ago

Sure thing. But an article with an anonymous source talking negatively in broad terms and without specifics about a software meant to stop reliance on techbros, coming from an outlet with direct ties to said techbros?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

For group chats Matrix is only bearable without encryption but that invalidates the whole point of Matrix

[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 26 points 8 hours ago

To summarize: an unnamed official, let’s call him “Brad”, got to participate in a trial for a new sovereign office tool. According to Brad, the new tool was “absolute s—t” and he still prefers working with good ‘ol Teams (cuz ‘reasons’).

Thanks, Brad. And thanks Politico for this entertaining, yet remarkably useless bit of trivia.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 hours ago

“I don’t understand the added value here,” one official wrote on an internal staff message board, seen by POLITICO. Another described the tool as “absolute shit.”

Which is basically the exact sort of reaction you get any time anything changes about any software ever.

I could give my parents new light switches that also make toast and clean the windows, and my dad would complain about them being 0.2cm too narrow.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not as if Microsoft Teams is not absolute shite

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

I'm sure Teams is good for something but what that is isn't obvious. I hate that everything gets pushed to teams. No, I don't need another fucking channel to check if someone wrote something that might be useful information for me, oh and by the way, we hid the channel that did have the useful information because "fuck you, that's why".

Did I mention that I don't like teams?

[–] ennof@feddit.org 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

If the officials do not see the added value in having sovereign software and infrastructure, I have to seriously doubt their qualification. Sure, Element isn't perfect but no concrete mention of what isn't working is made. That's not very constructive. Software isn't static. You can change it.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Free software can change. Microsoft Teams can't, because it's proprietary and owned by Microsoft. So here comes another benefit for free software. Trash article.

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They are citing four unnamed 'officials' and there is not a single detail explaining why exactly it is "s--t" ...

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's Axel Springer press to you.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

tbf, I think the "officals" wouldn't be able to elaborate either.

[–] remon@ani.social 10 points 7 hours ago

Absolute shit sounds like a big improvement over Teams, I'll take it!

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Reads pretty much like the sh--it Amazon rewiews... 1 star, I have no clue what I bought and how to use it. Also won't write down any details about what's wrong with it.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

Or “Ever since my grandma bought this toaster, my car ran out of gas (1 star)”