They won’t be camouflaged for long once the pollution starts to kill off the vegetation…pretty sure we have seen this scenario exactly before in the 60s & 70s…
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
426 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
88987 readers
4050 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Once they'll built they'll start to argue that they pollute anywhere so might as well stay there...
And still build as many as they can anywhere.
Their MO seems to be do whatever it takes to get started then finish
Yah its the whole move fast and break things mentality, and then ask for forgiveness later. Sometimes you don’t even have to ask for forgiveness…its fucked up.
A tale as old as time. Forestry has been doing this forever: clear-cutting where the public can't see it and keeping forests near roads pristine.
Once again: the problem isn't Microsoft or the datacenter builders. It's the governments approving these projects in the first place. Regulation is the only fix. Companies will rape and pillage unless we collectively choose to stop them.
The problem is Microsoft. It's also the datacentre builders. It's also the governments.
All three are a fucking problem
I mean, yes but?
Create a system that incentivizes people or groups to pursue profit ahead of environmental concerns and that's what you'll get. POSWID and all that.
Directing anger at Microsoft or a datacenter builder is a very convenient way for those in power to deflect blame away from those who created the system in the first place.
The only real, systemic solve is to fix the incentives through taxation and regulation.
Anything else is futile.
I disagree, all three must addressed whether individually or collectively. In today's America, there is little distinction between corporation and government, especially in the tech sector.
This is one of my critics of wilderness areas (I love them otherwise). Without having a place for people to be apart of and with the rest of the natural ecology of an area it's too easy to see avoiding active harm as an optional charity instead of a needed part of maintaining a living biosphere
Your sentence structure gave me an aneurysm.
Me too
Regulation through government won't do jack shit because the politicians writing those policies bury lots of grey areas and confusing language in there, because they're bought and paid for by the very tech companies those laws should regulate.
TL;dr laws and regulations won't do shit even though verbiage will be cleverly written to seem so.
So there's no hope and nothing to be done. Just go build that bunker in the woods and wait out the apocalypse.
they also dont put up for votes by the public in thier states too, so its extra layer of secrecy.
A 20 year gas deal is probably THE dummest fucking thing you can do. Shit isn't getting cheaper.
Ah, but it is likely that the deal is locked in place with some kind of price guarantee. Meaning they've guaranteed that they'll buy for 20 years, and in return they get a certain price. I doubt they've managed to get it for a flat price for 20 years, but it's likely a curve that'll be beneficial to both parts of the agreement.
And then any other parties not part of the deal that also need this gas, those who don't have 20 year contracts on fixed prices, they get to carry the burden. :)
Bruh. Attack the actual problems. there really are enough of them. No need to attack the only good point.
I wished every industry would "camouflage" their factories like that.
IIRC Microsoft built huge wind farms south of Chicago off of i55 to help power their data centers a couple decades ago, part of their carbon neutral plans or something similar.
The only way to avoid negative environmental consequences I've seen implemented is Japan using geothermal vents in the ocean.
They harvest the heat for energy, and the ocean (that would get heated up anyways) for cooling.
The net effect is an artificial reef and spreading the heat out further in a temperate zone that facilitates biological growth.
I don't think there's any scenario that actually works on land. Maybe out in the middle of the desert powered only by solar and using an absolutely massive heatsink that dumps it all over night when the desert is cold. But the cost for that would be insane.
Yah but that requires coastal development or in the vicinity of the coast, with increasing sea level rise, that is just going to require these things to be made like giant doomsday bunkers able to survive a life extinguishing event. I still question the need for these data centers.
Yah but that requires coastal development or in the vicinity of the coast
There's this new thing called "boats"...
And data cables can (and do) run along the ocean floor, they don't even need to connect to mainland, they can join an existing cable.
I still question the need for these data centers
We needed them before AI and well need them after...
Finding an environmental positive way to have them is worthwhile. Arguing that it's expensive literally just means you're putting a price on our planet. Which is especially stupid since the billionaires are the ones keeping those savings.
Quit fucking simping for billionaire techbros. Even if you don't realize it's what you're doing, it's what you're doing. Fuck their profits the planet matters more.
There’s this new thing called “boats”…
Yah sorry nobody serious is putting a data center on a floating boat/vessel. Maybe submerged, but not on the surface.
Jesus...
That's honestly what you thought?!
I meant that geothermal vents are rarely on the shoreline anyways, and a bot is what's needed, not coastal facilities.
I mean damn dude, you actually thought putting a fat center on a boat is what I was suggesting?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Natick
And they're trying to put datacenters in space, too. On a boat would be less unusual.
Well it wasn’t clear what you were saying, sorry. Yah copy that, that could work, but why not just keep the vents on the seafloor…no boat is needed.
but why not just keep the vents on the seafloor…no boat is needed.
...
Yes, you can not "move" a geothermal vent from the ocean floor, and especially not onto a boat...
The boat is what's needed to sink the equipment deep to the ocean floor.
I think the real problem is, you don't know what a geothermal vent actually is.
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/deep-sea-hydrothermal-vents/
The entire reason these are perfect is it's near boiling water surrounded by deep sea near frozen temps. You don't get that anywhere near a shore. And even if you did, doing it 20 miles or 200 miles from any shore is the same amount of effort.
But I got to tap out here
you mean camouflaging so it doesn't get identified to be vandalized, sabotaged or protested from, much like they did with some corporate farms to hide abuse.
all this to power windows 11 AI slop, and some government mass surveillance tech.
Since when does toms hardware give my computer aids? Oh how the mighty have fallen.
Complete nonsense spin attempt by Microsoft.