this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
450 points (99.3% liked)

Funny

16407 readers
1333 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspirate@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I was so confused when I realized that the restaurant thing is the same as the tire company. I'd assumed my whole life that it was just random that both happened to be associated with the same name. Honestly it still doesn't make much sense to me.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Gave away the joke with the title

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 hours ago

This was from the cool time when companies used their money to make things even if they're only tangentially related to their business. The mickelin guide and the gennis book of records are cut from the same cloth.

Now companies just spend money on stock buybacks and other financial chicanery.

[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

Michelin is the exact opposite of AMC

You expect AMC theaters and the AMC channel to be the same thing

They're not

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 65 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It is weird when you think about it.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 59 points 15 hours ago

Similarly, the Guinness book of records was started by Guinness the beer brand to settle pub arguments.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Yeah. I always assumed the name Michelin was just a coincidence. I was incredulous when I found out that it's the same company. Genuinely weird thing for a tire company to do.

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Nah, originally it was just a complementary map for those who bought tires. They ended up just being the most reputable reviewer with their star system that it became a prestige thing afterwards.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

They did not start it for the reason in the comic. That is a complete fabrication.

It was an internal list of restaurants to wine and dine fine clients, and it was a massive success and many people who wanted to know where to take their own clients kept trying to find out about the Michelin list

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I always knew because my parents had this book with the tire guy on it:

I don't remember if it mentioned restaurants in it as well, but the association with them and travel guides made the connection for me, I guess.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Nah that’s the green guide. It’s focused on sight seeing and cultural attractions.

The red guide is the restaurant one.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

That's a cool looking booklet.

[–] alci@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago

Michelin also edited road maps and built milestones to help early time drivers find there way on the roads !

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 13 hours ago

I mean, when you're a tire company and not a lot of people have cars or good reasons to put lots of miles on them...

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

All that food sampling has made his body lumpy and bloated.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

And ribbed for her pleasure

[–] jello@programming.dev 14 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

Does it actually make money for them somehow? Or does it just keep their name in the public's collective mind?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 26 points 16 hours ago

It helped them sell more tires, it associated the tires name with higher quality, it made money by itself, and it pushed the mascot into an icon capable of making money by itself.

All for something that sounds like a dr. Doofenshmittz plan.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 27 points 18 hours ago

Maybe it associates their name with high quality as well.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You have to remember that Michelin is a French company, so the Michelin star guide was originally about getting the French public to drive to French restaurants.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The French car-owning public... In 1900. So basically getting the ultra rich to drive to very expensive restaurants.

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

They were famous for referencing good restaurants, not only stared ones.

[–] TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Even a restaurant with one star nowadays is a $60 seat minimum. The best restaurants in the world are expensive.

[–] shitlord@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

There's one in Hong Kong that is famously inexpensive for a 1 star, like $10-15 USD for a meal of dim sum. I think I read somewhere it's the cheapest 1 star restaurant in the world.

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

The state/county/province/whatever pays several million dollars for the guide to judge its restaurants.

Its a very valuable tourism and service industry development tool.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They make a bunch of money selling the guides.

It’s become a whole side business.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's leeching money. The fine dining bills are through the roof. The cost of the guides, that few people actually buy, stand in Pqle comparison of having to buy multiple courses in the most expensive restaurants in the world.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Got a source for your claim Michelin loses money on the guides?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The source is the podcast 'no such thing as a fish', which is generally well sourced.

https://podcasts.musixmatch.com/podcast/no-such-thing-as-a-fish-01gv2bv14079rhv1ch6dvacmgt/episode/no-such-thing-as-fishing-in-the-sea-of-tranquility-01jdv42kt341n4r3tk1d3qpe9y

The quote in particular is from a Chicago chef, and it's localized. However the sales of the book themselves are marginal considering the cost of the system.

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

A bit of a tangential aside, but I always disliked that podcast name. Fish is a reasonable morphological and ecological term and the fact that people have tried to stretch it into a phylogenetic term is silly. Morphology is a perfectly legitimate way to describe something; it just gives you a different set of information.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Yeah it's a bit of an unfortunate name. They call it 'fish' for short, which is a bit contradictory too, as there now is a thing called fish.

I don't think they previsioned the shows succes

[–] tacosanonymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Shrugs. I have never eaten at a starred restaurant and I have never specifically purchased tires from Michelin.

[–] deWafelMan@lemmus.org 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I have, because they’re amazing tires for my climate- the cross climate ones.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 15 hours ago

Michelin tires are fine, I bought many of them because my favourite tire place sells a shitton of heavy truck tires from them so they have great discounts. And I've eaten at a starred restaurant because it was my friends'. Haven't loved the latter tho.

[–] Sturgist@piefed.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

I have both accidentally eaten at a Starred restaurant and unintentionally bought their tires. Happened to eat at a restaurant around the corner from a hotel in Spain that was Starred and only found out after. And got the garage to put new tires on and asked for the not totally cheapest but affordable and got their All Seasons.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I would think it would be really hard for them to tell if it's working or not, but at this point the restaurant ratings are kind of their own institution and there would probably be a backlash if they shut it down.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

The cost of eating in the finest establishments in the world, together with hotels, air-fare and double blind secrecy makes that it's a net money sink.

[–] usethefakinterminal@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

What an evil plan XD

[–] usethefakinterminal@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine traveling for about two hours to get to a place that serves garbage instead of food, and then getting a flat tire on the way back. Now you're hungry and need a new tire. Stress level: Pro Max. XD

[–] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago

If all the restourants you go in are shit, I am starting to wonder where you live or how many bad choices you make

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

..........why would anyone do this? How about I imagine something not idiotic?