this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
499 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

89005 readers
2616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So you mean to tell me they had the technology the whole time to make upgraded modular chips and sell them for pre-existing computer architecture but chose not to because they knew people would pay for the shiny new toys.

There's a chip crisis and SUDDENLY!!!!!! We're all able to use new technologies on old computer architectures.......

Call it supply and demand but I think that's fucked up nm which way you look at it.

I read that and then immediately thought to myself, so they just chose not to release upgrades for old architectures and speed released a shit load of new hardware they knew people would pay OTA for.

This whole time they could've actually been making old computers better than they are and make it so the consumer didn't have to spend a fuck load on upgrades but waited till a chip shortage to do it.....

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 128 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's almost like planned obsolescence is a well document and viable business strategy.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago

Lightbulb moment

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For...40 years? Demand for older consumer CPUs has dropped to zero over a few years because the new ones are demonstrably more capable and basically the same price. That's the whole idea behind Moore's Law. There are niche applications where that hasn't been true that were mostly filled by recycled hardware or single board computers. But in general people want the more capable device.

There's a whole conversation to be had about software bloat that that chain enabled but planned obsolescence it ain't.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they're talking about planned obsolescence for the mobo / socket not the CPU. Yeah most people want the latest CPU but they don't necessarily want a mobo upgrade too, but Intel will release a new socket so that you have to get the new mobo.

If they just released an updated CPU on an old socket plenty of people would buy that but Intel chose not too to juice mobo sales.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I think a really good ‘for instance’ of what we are talking about is the Pentium Overdrive released in the early-mid 90s. It was a Pentium class processor designed to fit the 486 (previous generation, also where the Pent part of Pentium came from) socket. They have never not been able to backport new instruction sets they just don’t and now we have even more evidence of that.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

The old hardware still works perfectly fine though

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These are only "new" chips in a marketing sense.

From a tech standpoint, they're more or less the same chips that Intel was making for LGA1700 3-4 years ago refreshed with a new name and model number. They may have slight tweaks to the clocks and the core configs, but other than that there's really nothing new about them. It's the same silicon that Intel launched back in 2022.

The only reason Intel is doing this is because LGA1700 supports DDR4 and that's kept the demand for it alive with how expensive DDR5 is now.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of those chips have new configurations and power demands. There's now a 8+12 that is 65w, and the substitute for the 14600K is a 8+8.

I currently have a 13700K, but if one of those new CPUs have a 8+12 version that's better than the 14700K and doesn't turn into a literal furnace I'll be interested in getting one.

The change in tdp doesn’t really change how the chip fundamentally acts. If you want a non furnace CPU then underclock it and power limit it. Maybe these new CPUs are 0.1% more power efficient as the manufacturing process has improved. But other than the core counts you can do the exact same thing with the existing chips.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Since I was a wee lad, when the internet was just an idea, to this day, it's the first time that "innovation" doesn't go "higher, further, faster!" But the opposite...

[–] BlueWhiteGreenDougFir@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't know about you, but I've gotten sadly accustomed to tech "innovation" being more about novel ways of squeezing money out of people way more often than "higher, further, faster" or anything that makes our lives easier, more interesting, or more enjoyable.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Hence i said "innovation"... It was rarely really an innovation. And the more recent, the more your description fits.

Sadly so, I might add.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 21 points 1 week ago

crapitalism breeds innovation...

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

I mean AMD has been able to reuse sockets for multiple generations of actual new cpus. Intel has just never done it that way.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Turns out new sockets were just to rip you off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Lol remember when they software locked LGA1511 to prevent 8th and 9th gen CPUs from working on existing 6th/7th gen motherboards, and then the modding community bypassed it with some BIOS mods and Teflon tape.

This whole time they could've actually been making old computers better than they are and make it so the consumer didn't have to spend a fuck load on upgrades but waited till a chip shortage to do it.....

This isn't anything new in the component industry. Nvidia is even more guilty of this with their RTX ray tracing scam which now looks comically small next to their subsequent AI bubble.

I've personally preferred AMD for this reason because they actually thought ahead of Intel on several occasions like x64, multicore processors, more efficient laptop CPU power consumption, actually funding next gen hardware specs, etc.

In my eyes, the last time Intel was even "on top" of AMD was the skylake overclock era where single thread performance was still sought after heavily.

Hilariously though my servers are all Intel xeons because of their sheer production volume making used parts much cheaper than AMD.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Y'all got somma that DDR3?

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I got a bunch laying about for one reason or another. Sadly, it's all laptop RAM.

I mean, not sadly for me, as I have a fetish for micro PCs, and guess what...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

AI is causing human regression. That's what this is.

Is one thing to poison the minds of idiots, but this is technological regression.

Things are getting bad.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

i would say it’s causing a capitalism growth spurt which is “too fast” for the owning class to really keep up, especially with more and more working class realizing capitalism is the problem, not ai, chips, socket types…

i am hoping this growth will be what will cause its downfall.

The monopolists realized that their product is no longer unique so they have to create bottle necks in order to force out competition.

load more comments (1 replies)

We're all able to use new technologies on old computer architectures.......

Except we’re not? They’re still the same raptor lake CPUs. Maybe a bump in clock speed, maybe a change in core counts. But the underlying technology is still the exact same. The only new tech I’d expect on these boards is WiFi 7 instead of 6e. But most WiFi cards on desktop are M.2 and you can already swap them out.

The only mew thing is that they’re making them again, and making new versions of them. Otherwise it’s the same stuff. It’s just giving people a second chance to upgrade to this older stuff.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard there's a new board with new architecture which works with DDR3!

[–] notabot@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If they make a mobo that'll take at least 64gb of DDR3, and an architecture that'll use it, I'm interested.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did some digging and couldn't find anything.

If I'm recreating the youtube video in my mind, I think they'd gone shopping on the streets of Singapore... I did find articles saying China was building DDR3 boards, so maybe you could take a flight out there for the difference in RAM prices and come out even.

[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Found a few on Aliexpress. Four ram slots, but up to 128GB for some. (unless the seller lied)

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If someone made a board with like 8 slots for ddr3 and a socket for a decent cpu, it would sell like hotcakes. Basically free ram.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They do, they’re called servers. Ddr3 era servers are basically worthless. We have some old ddr3 servers at work that I can’t even give away short of dealing with the “free” section of Marketplace or CL. I ain’t dealing with that again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZeroPoke@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Memory controllers used to be on the motherboards. So your motherboard would determine the type of RAM you used.

As you may know the something called the chipset these days they used to be called south bridges and we had a north bridge. And the North bridge had things like Memory Controller and other IO stuff. South Bridge hasn't changed much in terms of what it does. More IO.

It's basically like cache tiers. The closer you are to the CPU the faster you can be.

[–] AntonioAndolini@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I thought North and south bridges still existed. That architecture stopped in 2008... Wtf

[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they had the technology the whole time to make upgraded modular chips and sell them for pre-existing computer architecture

I've heard that it's also possible to make consumer motherboards with ECC RAM and no built-in wifi as well, but surely someone would've tried that by now if is was technologically possible.

Maybe the RISC-V RVA23 push will be able to figure it out.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

I'm so glad I didn't listen to people online about staying on the "dead" AM4 socket for my rig upgrade two years ago. My 5800X3D might end up being the best value purchase I've ever made...

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Time to sell my old DDR4 sticks I guess.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Feel like it's more "when designing an upgrade you do it all at once not piecemeal" so it never made sense to use old tech before because you'll just cause a bottleneck.

Even though I still feel like using "the fastest" ram used to just end up giving you more problems and crashes..

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Cool I'll buy some DDR4 before I gets expensive.. Annnnnd. It's gone.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Its almost as if its planned obsolescence or somethin

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does this mean I can finally upgrade my i7 from 2018 without ditching my mobo and ram?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah but DDR4 is just as expensive these days.

[–] Flaxseed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Definitely has become more expensive, but I assume this is intel trying to sell units to consumers with existing systems that otherwise would not be upgrading, due to the cost of moving to a DDR5 platform.

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not really, prices for DDR4 "only" have doubled, whereas prices for DDR5 have quadrupled.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I checked recently and my particular ddr4 memory has quadrupled. I had bought an extra 16Gb just before the crisis because I hit oom with poe1 once, so I guess it was lucky timing. Haven't checked other rams though.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only place where you'll ever notice any difference between RAM generations is the specs sheet. And even there it's minor.

Call it supply and demand but I think that's fucked up nm which way you look at it.

Intel and AMD - the entire x86 duopoly - is basically there specifically to ensure consumer PCs are as shit as possible, and to do everything in their power to slow down any meaningful technological progress.

[–] JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Exactly, Intel dug their heels in and gave us quad core after quad core for the best part of 10 years whilst AMD was floundering around until Ryzen Gen 1 came along. No innovation just because they didn't have to.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Got my hopes up I thought my haswell server was about to get an upgrade. I love that little 4690k.

[–] likebudda@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Rolling with my 5800X3D 'till the wheels fall off and even then I have a 5700X3D as a backup. I'm not upgrading until 5090-level GPU performance is available for less than $800.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I'm not upgrading

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I drove my FX-8320 into the ground through college and a few years beyond. That poor little chip got tortured with so much voltage...

My 5800X3D will be in my maxed out AM4 rig for a looonnnggg time.

load more comments
view more: next ›