this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
284 points (90.1% liked)

Today I Learned

32337 readers
78 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] core@leminal.space 110 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Good video but a terrible opening

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago

Excuse me, excuse me, but this is a clearly unscripted random interaction with a fellow probably human.

…yeah, it soured me on the rest as well, although it sounds like the idea itself is good. heh

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Only Billy Eichner is allowed to do that

https://youtu.be/QwL_pRzJuR4

[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

I thought it was fun.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why the fuck are they giving exemptions to vehicles that are constantly on city roads?

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It sounds like it's something they can only require them on vehicles whose companies have contracts with the city. If true, I'd assume that the exempted trucks aren't hauling away city waste - maybe construction debris or something like that.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] hypnicjerk@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

not much the city can do about that - the state handles motor vehicle regulations.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

I thought you couldn't be right. Whelp.

... requires large vehicles in the City Fleet and in City contracted vehicles be equipped with safety enhancing side guards ...

https://rules.cityofnewyork.us/rule/side-guards-on-heavy-duty-trade-waste-vehicles/

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

why were people given religious covid exemptions

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Because society caters to stupid people.

Obviously the exemptions for the vehicles was money.

I hate how we as a society keep catering to stupid people and companies when it comes to basic safety practices.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Two types of people in the world: those who don't think about the need for this and those who spent time on liveleak.

[–] GottaHaveFaith@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

there's no liveleak anymore. Literally tried it yesterday D:

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

I've heard some guy named Hagseth is bringing it back

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"Technology" aka portable fence

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, yeah. A lot of innovations in safety is really just stupidly simple things that we learned the hard way (someone being hurt).

The stupid part however isn't how simple these things are, but rather how hard it is to get through even the most basic changes.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

A stone wheel is "technology".

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The dude's priority list at the end...

  1. The poor truck driver (who was non-compliant)
  2. The company's insurance
  3. The person being killed by the truck
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

Makes sense. Dead people don't have tights, right? /s

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well I mean I'm guessing he's part of a union and needs to sell his soul a little bit to the, "one for all," spirit. I'm hoping when he's at home away from the union, he's more for the safety of all individuals than just the company he works for.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What product or service was it trying to sell to its audience?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That question just might be answered by watching the posted content! But I don't blame you for not, this was a rough watch.

I got about 15 seconds in before the visceral disgust was too much to bear. I'd rather the answer be a mystery than listen to more fucking "TIL: I am about to preach to you" posters

[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

I watched the entire video, and not just the first 15 seconds. I saw a journalist report how a law in New York City hasn't been properly implemented, leading to multiple unnecessary deaths a decade later.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Cringe ass safety psa

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Expected a joke.

Discovered a tragedy.

Also a neat device.

NY, get your heads out of your asses and just do it. Get it done! 100% of trucks! Big fines for it not being there! Go!

Hell, this should just be all urban areas in the world.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is in EU, and in UK, and in Japan.

It's only third world nations, such as USA, that have such shoddy safety standards as this

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Going from arguably the world's strongest superpower, to at least pejoratively a third world is so depressing.

All it takes is Conservatism!

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Pejorative and Actually too

Third World under the strictest definition: Not in NATO or the Warsaw Pact (no longer exists, was a pact between USSR, China and some other random countries)

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh snap.

I immediately think of a lot of old white guys scoffing at that and trying to rationalize why that doesn't actually matter, casually throwing away a single weapon that they previously used against others for their own benefit.

[–] Apollo98@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Save us Mamdani!

[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I’ve never seen those guards in Finland, which is part of the E.U.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

EU has a lot of fragmented (by country) road laws.

But guards/skirts are usually integrated into the design, not third-party add-ons.

Random examples:





[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

That looks clean

[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

I've never seen guards like this either, but more importantly I've never seen the large gaps in the side that guides victims to fall beneath multiple wheels.

I suspect all the trucks I've seen in Europe left the factory compliant with the regulation, with no need to install side guards.

[–] Lehmuusa@nord.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago

I opened Google Street View and "drove" along Mannerheimintie. Here are images of all trucks I found along the "drive":

image

image

image

...and then I figured I'd try some rednecky place, and the most redneck place I could pick from my hat was Kauhava (sorry, everyone in Kauhava). I figure that if in some place they drive trucks with illegal modifications, then that's there.

So, I went for truck hunt there as well, which turned out to be much more difficult than I thought! Anyway, here:

image

I am not able to find a truck in Finland that does not have those protecting devices installed. And I don't think I have ever seen one.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Toothless laws to let businesses save some money at the cost of people’s live

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago

Before I opened this and saw the video, I thought it was going to be an indicator light.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know how the fuck this isn't a federal law?

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Edit: I guess other countries have them

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trucks will always be needed. Trains can't go everywhere.

Also, the passenger-train utopia we both want would require lighter-duty high-speed rail, which freight trains wouldn't be able to operate on

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Not boxcars, no. But up to the 50s we had electric rail in my area that handled panel-van kind of packages from station to station, via shipping cars hooked to the same train as passengers.

Then pneumatic tires and gasoline-powered buses got popular and they killed electric rail. We still haven't the reach, speed, or versatility as we had then, since buses need to fight traffic against cars.