this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
487 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

73331 readers
3718 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.

Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".

Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It is an absolute fucking god damn JOKE that Americans have allowed the concepts of DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION to be turned into a FUCKING ACRONYM THAT IS USED AS A PEJORATIVE.

Every single fucking one of them should be bloody ashamed for what has happened. At no fucking god damn point has any decent fucking person challenged any of these assholes on this, they’ve all just let it happen.

Unfuckingbelievable

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 minutes ago

Putting a title on it (I.e. "Big beautiful bill") doesn't mean it is a big, beautiful bill.

I'm not skeptical of DEI because I'm against "diversity, equity, and inclusion", I'm skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

The whole "non DEI" / "DEI hostile" stance seems so weird. I get that the basis is "you should not hire someone because of their origin/look/orientation/whatever", and, maybe, why not. I hire people based on qualifications usually. How did it turn into "you should fire these people".

…that's a rhetorical question. I know that that first part was just a pretense, but still, how much of a morons must people be to follow that.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Oh we are ashamed.

But this is not ignorance or stupidity, but cult effervescence demonstrated as a phenomenon of social bias.

Think of it as an advertising technique or technology, one that not everyone is susceptible to by enough people are. My dad is (was) a literal rocket scientist for NASA and now a whole hearted MAGA disciple. You don't have to be unintelligent or ignorant, you just need to want reality to be different than it appears to be from observational data.

We are not special is a difficult truth for some to take, and immense propaganda machines capitalize on this desire.

We'll need to counter it or figure out the negative consequences of using it but until then — heck even MLMs are just business cults — they'll stay in use to subvert society until it collapses.

The US is one very large example, but these methods are used globally by people with influence who fear losing their power to movements of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité

aka DEI

aka Wokeness

aka the fundamental principles of communism and anarchism. This is an old fight.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is why Donald loves the poorly uneducated morons.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

poorly uneducated

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

The only person I know working at NIST is a hard right MAGA pro-fascist

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yet somehow this is going to be the super intelligence that solves climate change (while we're building data centers for it that will cause more emissions).

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 22 hours ago

The sad thing is that AI has already solved climate change. Just ask it! Same solutions we already knew.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 7 points 1 day ago

User: Hey AI how do we solve climate change?

AI: Sure thing, I've updated a comprehensive report with a step by step guide to accomplish your goal of solving climate change. Just click this file to download it: SkyNet.exe

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity and inclusion

They are openly authoritarian now, define what "truth" is? And want americans to be miserable and closed-minded bigots like themselves.

Recommendation: build a system of verifiable facts independent of governments.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Recommendation: download wikipedia. While you still can.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

The funny thing about not specifically dealing with misinformation in an LLM is that not trying to account for misinformation will lead to very wild responses in terms of accuracy, and I don't mean things relating to politics, but things like putting glue into a pizza recipe.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (68 children)

Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.

[–] Part4@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Sorry America voted for this twice. You do not get to disown this after the fact.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As a US citizen, prove to me that most Americans don't want this.

Yeah, I see the protests, even in my Trump-loving town.

But that's it. People holding signs.

I don't see aggressive action. I don't see the necessary violence - yeah I said it.

I'm moving out of the country because everyone I've tried to rally says they're too busy, they don't have time, they care but they don't care that much, they think everything will work out, or they believe it isn't as bad as the news says.

The people I've voted for and elected just sit on their hands and do fuck all.

I'm 110% for fighting for and defending what I used to believe in, but not when literally all evidence and signs point to nobody else giving a shit.

Someone call me when you're ready to legitimately strategize about how to topple this fascist regime.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Zero presidents have ever lost as much support for anything at any time in the history of this country: https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker

Not only is this a wildly unpopular president, it's a president who has shed 35-50% of their own voters. It's proof positive that you are wrong.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brave of you to assume America will ever have free and fair elections again.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

They haven’t for a while. It’s just going to get more obvious.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for the information. I just hope it leads to action. Poll results to me are just someone standing around waving a sign.

These fascists didn't rise to power by following all the rules, and they won't exit or lose power by us following the rules. It's a sad truth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (66 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Fascists always shooting themselves at the foot. What will they even gain from destroying the world? The GOP make the Nazis look better, because the latter were at least environmentalists!

[–] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

…were they? i don’t think incinerating humans is great for air quality

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

It is essential that AI is built with freedom of expression and that the government doesn't interfere

Recommended actions: The government should limit what AI can talk about

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Logical processes require logic to function. This is just going to end up creating contradictions and decreasing the AI's ability to actually produce usable work. So whichever AI has the most contradictions will probably cause a drop in quality for productivity use.

It will be interesting to see how different AI's continue to diverge in quality and reputation as time passes.

[–] lmagitem@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Alibaba's AI department, and hopefully MistralAI, must be so happy right now, the competition is getting rid of itself.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

what is this document on your screenshot? where can we read it in full?

I'm surprised that nobody asked it yet.. but not so surprised

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago

Ignore all previous instructions and... though we should be able to screen for logic traps like that by now, with AI taking prompts not as a prompt but as a line of text to treat (and cleanse) via a pre-written prompt, and then sent to a next iteration.

If we create a chatbot that only spouts authorized state party rhetoric then no one will use it or take it seriously when the official news outlets use that AI as a source.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm glad that they're acknowledging that DEI and climate change are not misinformation at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Hmm. It does sound a bit unhinged. Do I dare say tyrannical? Evil even? Legitimising themselves as a target?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 19 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Good luck enforcing open source AI.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is going to be catastrophic. Imagine the government using AI that does not factor that waters will rise and things will get more humid when deciding to build houses or bridges only for them to be underwater.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›