this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
119 points (88.4% liked)

Europe

6842 readers
606 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope they do make the details public, but it does look like EU bent the knee with this one.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

So disappointed in Van der Leyen - this is weak! Steel tax remains at 50%! And EU is going to buy more military equipment from US, madness!

The only positive is that signed agreements doesn't really seem to mean anything anymore...

[–] Laser@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

So disappointed in V[o]n der Leyen

So I have to assume you're not German, because otherwise you'd have known that she's a garbage politician. She got promoted to a EU position because she was no longer tenable nationally. The reason she doesn't get flak from Germany right now is that she's from the conservative party that recently got elected.

It seems get Wikipedia pages got somewhat scrubbed because a lot of the scandals are missing. Here are some from memory:

Internet stop signs: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/ein-stoppschild-furs-reine-gewissen-4758619.html

Lost court case against weapon manufacturer H&K: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/lg-koblenz-8o19815-heckler-koch-g36-sturmgewehr-nicht-mangelhaft-vone,-das-n-der-leyen-verliert (actually least egregious one on the list, but still incompetent)

The consulting affair that involved cronyism while she was minister of defense: summary at https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ursula-von-der-leyen-und-die-berateraffaere-faktisches-komplettversagen-a-55458b1c-64bd-436b-acdf-75afcef0f5d3

Destroyed evidence: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/vonderleyen-handydaten-101.html

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

So true. Australia has a Free Trade Agreement with the US signed in 2011 (I think?). And, America enjoys a trade deficit with us. We buy more of your shit than you buy from us. Still, Trump hit us with a 10% tariff for some goddamn reason. We've paid about a billion dollars on a down payment for Virginia Class Submarines that we will never, ever see.

It will be about a century before the world will trust the US again.

[–] bluefootedbooby@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Is there anything right Van der Leyen did as the commissioner? πŸ™„

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Don't ask what she did before moving to EU.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

That’s my impression also. It looks like the USA is just looking to dump their shitty old military equipment and Ursula just said yes and then felt the need to justify it with weak stand on it…

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's it. I'm going to vote for explicitly anti-American parties at the next election.

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We are now in a neo-liberal economy. Your wallet has more (or at least as much) power than your ballot.

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Anyone disappointed should just boycott everything coming from the USA, from companies owned by the USA (PE, stock market, etc).

Start with easy stuff. Like benzin/diesel for your car. Don't go to esso or jet. Then, stop drinking Coca-Cola, Pepsi, etc. or going to the McDonald's. Boycott Tesla, Ford & Co.

Cancel your Netflix and Amazon prime, and buy CDs, DVDs and blue rays.

Stop buying iPhones. Move away from Microsoft and Google as much as possible. In your private life and your companies. Go open source.

Trade wars are a problem only for the seller if there are no buyers.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and buy CDs, DVDs and blue rays.

Or just pirate your media...

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago

To paraphrase Jeff Winger:

You may have read it, I may have thought it, but I didn't write it.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Been doing all that for over a decade...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How is buying DVDs and blurays better than Netflix subscription, if they are American content?

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For one: ownership. Nobody can take away your DVDs legally.

Second: you can buy 2nd hand. Only the (local) reseller makes money.

Third: you can buy local content...

Fourth: no recurring sales for Netflix & co. And this is huge. Because they use their ARR to get financing, Netflix & co need you to pay monthly. Buying DVDs is much less predictable and does not give them the same financial power.

Fifth: you can lend them. Want to share a movie with friends? They didn't need their own subscription. You can just lend them the DVD. Again: less sales.

Finally: once you start going this, your discover your local ecosystem. Libraries, associations, forums etc. With doing like this for culture (Books, music, movies), tools, and even expertise.

[–] sanity_is_maddening@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wish more people thought like you.

And I wish I gave answers as swift and succinct as yours. I wrote a reply that is too looooong. Yours is better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BCOVertigo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Buy it second hand. They can have their initial sale a decade ago and no residual income. I'll buy it from you when you don't want it or need some cash! Better burn a backup as well before it gets scratched. Don't accidentally lose twenty backups at your friends houses though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ashamed to be European today. For all the tough talk and strong worded letters we really can't blame anyone else about being so dependent on other forces when we capitulate so easily to these thugs.

For all the talk about holding the line with other allies such as Canada, who are much closer and keeping their elbows up, this is truly disgraceful. Plus with all the far right influence popping up all over the west at the same time, which isn't a coincidence.

Besides, with the way the US is going, Trump or not, how long until this deal is null and void by them?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is temporary as the world adjusts to omit the US. It takes time to reorient your economy away from a consumer economy, and the US. I expect it will happen faster than many expect, as the US will no longer be a desirable supplier or consumer of your goods.

They are isolating themselves.

[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that's my one hope, to be honest.

I understand needing them for now, because there's kind of change needed is just that huge. But I hope we actively put in the work to break away from this dependence long term.

[–] ReallyAngryNerd@europe.pub 15 points 3 days ago

We made a deal to give the bully half of our lunch money. Until the bully decides otherwise.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I thought this might help:

So basically no fossil fuels and do not get sick. Things you want to do anyway, but the later is unfortunatly kind of hard.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Did not know oil was #1. Are the USA also the #1 provider of oil for the EU?

Anyhow, asssuming the 15% are higher than what it was before, this just plays into Russia's hands. Trump is such an idiot, and von der Leyen is not much better, although the EU going for this cannot be completely her responsibility.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

The US is the biggest source of oil for the EU, but only has 15% market share in Q1 this year. However Russia was at 25% in Q1 of 2022. So it is certainly possible to replace it. Especially by driving less and going for EVs.

But also the EU basically not charging tariffs on US exports to the EU. This is insanely one sided and should be shut down.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

This is a mistake. It shows weakness. Build trade partners elsewhere and ignore trump and the US.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

Is the 15% in both directions?

[–] Argyle13@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Von der Layen did. Not EU citizens. Many are, let,s say, a bit angry about this issue. Shameful.

[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 20 points 3 days ago

So this was a deal to save the car industry and it keeps us addicted to fossil fuel. I'm disappointed to say the least.

[–] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

This is still just a tentative deal that has to be ratified by all the countries so there's still hope.

Friendly reminder that you can use this site to find your MPs in the European Parliament. Remind them that they are there for and because of us, and let them know what you think of this kind of deal making.

If EU doesn't stop this recent festival of stupidity the European project will go nowhere fast. There's already a huge problem with the rise of euro-scepticism and these bellends just add fuel to fire. I'm tired boss.

[–] LilB0kChoy@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Article title:

Von der Leyen and Trump strike EU-US trade deal with 15% tariff for the bloc

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

@hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz Could you fix the editorialized title, please? (Note from the mod.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

yeah, what's with the title?!

OP don't use your opinion as a title. Seriously

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump called the Japanese deal he never actually made the biggest deal in history, this could be the same thing here ultimately

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, we need explanations here. This looks really negative

[–] sucius@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It looks fucking weak and pathetic and the UE should have stood its ground, but apparently it's the same as with the Japan deal. The investments are just smoke, no money allocated, no dates, etc. Just an empty gesture to appease MAGAts Still, pathetic and VdL should be sacked.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Do note that a lot of early reporting on Trump's "deals" in the past have often been grossly misleading. Often counting existing agreements as new one or leaving critical details out

For instance, I recall a lot of people were questioning a deal with Mexico earlier as bending the knee that turned out to largely be just be puff agreements that they had already made before Trump

There's a decent chance that this is continuing that pattern. Though I can't say for certain of course

[–] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Die gehΓΆrt eingesperrt

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Asked about what concessions, if any, the US had made in the talks, the Commission chief replied with a general remark about shared prosperity.

"The starting point was an imbalance, a surplus (of goods) on our side and a deficit on the US side. We wanted to rebalance the trade relation, and we wanted to do it in a way that trade goes on between the two of us across the Atlantic," she said.

Let me get this straight… EU has a lot of goods the US needs. US does not have a lot of goods the EU needs. So the EU, which seems to have the upper hand, agrees to sell their goods to the US at a lower price? Is this mainly to avoid stepping on the toes of EU merchants that would like to sell to the US market specifically?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nico_198X@europe.pub 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Nah, just puff stuff to make him feel good. Mostly we're buying more energy from the US which, frankly, we need.

No one wants a trade war. It will just hurt us all.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Adding to that, it's only laying the ground work for a deal. It will have to be approved by all member states (which I doubt will happen in its current state) and months and years will pass until the lawsuits and debates are over. Who even knows what the US government will look like at this point. Yes, it may be bad optics right now, but I feel like a lot of people assume this is a done deal and not just regular politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thz@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It might not be as bad for the EU as the White House wants us to believe.

https://bsky.app/profile/jorgeliboreiro.bsky.social/post/3lv2kcg7cps2n

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Sure, if you believe a single thing coming out of the White House. I really don’t.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί