this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
1474 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

73416 readers
4260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Collective Shout, a small but vocal lobby group, has long called for a mandatory internet filter that would prevent access to adult content for everyone in Australia. Its director, Melinda Tankard Reist, was recently appointed to the stakeholder advisory board for the government’s age assurance technology trial before the under-16s social media ban comes into effect in Australia in December.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Let's say it like it is: after the world of hundreds of developers is undermined, and the property of thousands of customers is compromised.

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Who's behind this sudden wave of age verification bullshit, Schrödinger's parents? The ones who shove an iPad in front of their 2 year old and berate school teachers for not being poorly paid babysitters who raise their kids for them? And yet they claim to care SO MUCH about the well being of children that they push these obscene and draconian policies on the rest of us? What a bunch of fucking hypocrites, but that's typical for conservatives.

[–] proton_lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

Don't be fooled, that's not the real reason. Parents that shove iPads in front of their children are not even remotely worried about what their kids are watching online. This is purely about control, has nothing to do with children.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 52 points 1 day ago

Governments and some religious nutjobs.

They only pretend to care about children. It is about power and control. Always has been, always will.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Face backlash" = about 160,000 people signed a petition saying they disagreed with it, then went about their daily lives and totally, 100% without a doubt continued using their Visa or Mastercard credit cards.

They don't care, there are no alternatives. They can do whatever they want.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. We need thousands of people calling them non stop disturbing them for hours on end, not just signing petitions.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean like exactly what's been happening over the past few days?

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

Right, the actual solution is everyone taking their money out of the bank on the same day

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago

Yet 1000 weirdos in Australia will have more sway, curiously.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 125 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

While Collective Shout solely targeted games it said violated policies held by payment platforms, Itch.io's move to temporarily remove all NSFW content resulted in games with LGBTQ+ themes being removed.

One petition signer who is a member of the LGBTQ+ community said they were concerned that banning sexual-based games would be the start of cracking down on LGBTQ+ content.

There it is.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (11 children)

if the LGBTQ+ games were not sexual in nature (why does it not say?), then that is quite damning and I approve of this conspiracy theory.

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.org 38 points 1 day ago

It's not all that much of a conspiracy theory as those pushing this line at the payment processoers openly advocate that since LGBTQ+ references sex by way of sexuality and gender, then that is sexual content, and is therefore inappropriate for children. This, of course, completely ignores heterosexuality and cisgender because they consider queer people existing to be harmful to children. And trying to get through to them about how important age-appropriate sexual education is in combating child abuse is an exercise in frustration.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you google Tankard-Reist you'll find it's not a conspiracy theory - she has actively tried to block queer representation at every level in every way for decades

load more comments (1 replies)

politicians have literally said that the reason for censorship bills about the internet are specifically to go after lgbtq spaces.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as it is legal CC companies should be barred from dictating what products and services their systems cover.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So sick of conservatives forcing their beliefs on others. Filter your own content, use parents controls, don’t ban everything you don’t like because of your arrogant belief in made up morality. Morality is relative and religion does not give your opinions weight.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Yeah but Jesus definitely preached love thy neighbor, do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and also, ew gay people not in my back yard.

I'm pretty confident on two of those anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“The internet has no borders. Women and girls everywhere are impacted by male violence against women and misogyny in general which we believed these games perpetuated,” she said.

Yet the fictional violence against men and boys is A-Ok!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Mastercard/Visa monopoly (or duopoly) is bad for consumers. It should be broken up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 152 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What's even the argument here? Steam already has parental control options, age gates, and content filters... if you don't want your kids seeing that shit on steam, then, like, don't let em?

...meanwhile, let's just continue shoving blatant gambling down minors' throats in the form of lootboxes.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This group isn't interested in protecting children they're just interested in pushing their own beliefs on everybody else. The easiest way they can do that is to pretend that they're interested in children. Which I'm sure some of them are, but not in the capacity that anyone wants them to be.

It's a classic right-wing tactic. Because nobody wants to be against a law that protects children.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lebensmittel@sh.itjust.works 93 points 1 day ago (9 children)

The argument is control. Religious zealots are all about controlling society and subduing people to follow their rules (that they themselves tend to break all the time)

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 243 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Keep the pressure on.

Collective Shout got them to change their position and they're a small group. We are legion, as the kids say

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 110 points 1 day ago (7 children)

And we're the ones spending the money

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 1 day ago

That's really what I don't get. Why make it impossible for people to give you money. That doesn't seem to be the way capitalism is supposed to operate if something is popular then you should allow it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 135 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Feels like we're going back to the 90s/00s "Christian parents against video games" moral panic era. But this time, they're being appeased more heavily.

I despise conservatism. It destroys everything it touches.

[–] TheTurner@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago

It's another Satanic Panic.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 196 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Maybe it’s just because I’m so focused on my own issues as a US citizen… But how the hell did some Australian Christofascist group get this powerful? Like, the RIAA and MPAA combined couldn’t get the United States government to make this much movement on “objectionable content” (piracy at the time, and also now, and all of the time between then and now), but even the crypto fascists of yesterday year couldn’t get this much traction. Probably because people like Frank Zappa and Fred Rogers came forth to criticize the ridiculousness and the consequences of such a position and search policies.

May 1, 1969: Fred Rogers testifies before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications

And 16 years later:

Frank Zappa at PMRC Senate Hearing on Rock Lyrics

STAND UP!!! FIGHT BACK!! Citizen complacency is the most powerful weapon the fascist have – – relying on that you will be paralyzed with fear and do nothing to stop them.

RISE UP! RESIST! REVOLT!!

And show us the fucking Epstein files already, you fucking rapist, con man, felon, pedo, traitor!

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (17 children)

They got together enough people to mass email, that is all it took.

Companies tend to multiply received responses to represent the total number of people who were to lazy to complain, so Visa and MasterCard saw 1,000 emails as 10,000,000 in their risk averse actions.

Now 4chan is pissed and have started their own mass email and phonecall campaign, so we shall see where this goes...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Visa also have a fairly well documented history of kowtowing to Christian groups. The CEO of their Asian division is a right-wing religious fanatic who hates, well he's a religious fanatic so you know what he hates, but it's basically everything and everybody.

They don't like Japanese anime very much as well, probably because they think it's all pornography (anime does tend to have that bent, but it's not all pornography).

The thing is on their website they claim not to make moral judgements about purchasers, they claim to authorise anything that isn't actually illegal, so they should be totally fine with pornography and anime. If they are going to be right-wing religious fundamentalists at least they could be honest about it on their website.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"[Elon Musk] said he wanted to get his own X payments platform «going soon»".

Surely that's going to solve the problem. There's absolutely no censorship on Twitter. /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

When is the European alternative to these coming?

[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

An alternative to PayPal, called WERO is currently in it's rollout process in Germany, Belgium and France. In October the next step will be activated, allowing payments in e-commerce. Later down the road, you'll be able to pay in real shops. Luxembourg and Netherlands are to join in next. More and more banks start to adopt WERO.

I urge everyone to use WERO as much as you can. It's flying a bit under the radar at the moment and this must be a success. Hopefully more EU members will join soon.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 114 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Somebody should check their PCs and internet history; after all, name a better duo than Conservatives and Projection.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

While the pressure on the credit card companies should still work due to conversations behind closed doors, my understanding is that those companies are not actually payment processors. Payment processors are a bunch of companies/banks, some you likely haven't heard of (one is PayPal though, feel free to make your voice heard to them), and they are taking legal responsibility for the transactions themselves, and thus actually have incentive to police transactions. Credit card companies themselves, not having those legal liabilities, would much rather people just spent their money everywhere as long as there was low risk of cards being stolen or misused.

load more comments
view more: next ›