this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2026
1023 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

89099 readers
4988 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Wow, that quote is pure gold.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just want a dumb TV at this point or an open source one that has great user control.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago

Westinghouse and Magnavox TV brands both exist with dumb TV options, Max 32" though

The Westinghouse is unfortunately on Amazon, but I found the Magnavox at Canadian Tire for $200

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Used TVs are dirt cheap. Just buy one

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago

I say things in front of my cellphone and it advertises revelent content to me too

[–] kaotic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t want a smart TV… my TV should just be a display.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

It should be a hub with a display.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Find me in my living room, reading aloud SQL injection attacks and AI jailbreak promps like the newsreader from Rome

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

"No actors, tech-bros or other unclean professions may attend"

Little Bobby DropTables has entered the chat.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True Hacker SQL for True Hackers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Samsung is the second Electronics maker I've started boycotted, after Sony.

Sony was all the way back since the Rootkit scandal, Samsung was about a decade ago when a small tablet I bough from them have filled with unremovable applications and after a few updates became pretty much unusable because it's didn't have enough memory (clearly planned obscolecence).

Patting myself on back (and a little gloating) aside, Samsung has been clearly abusive towards their customers for a while (it was maybe the second electronics make to enshittify, after Sony) and this is not at all surprising.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

Samsung has been abusive format least a decade

Sony has been abusive for at least two

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People should have been imprisoned over the Sony rootkit scandal.

For those who don't know - their music CDs had malware built in that automatically installed itself on PCs without prompting or notification that gave unsecured root access to any PC through a hidden service that couldn't be detected or disabled from within Windows. It was as bad as bad gets. There was no hidden EULA or anything. They just straight-up installed viruses on millions of PCs that opened the door for other malware to install itself at the root level where it couldn't be detected.

Sony should have been shut down entirely over it.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow. Yeah, fuck Sony. Seems they've always been in a race to the bottom. Now their insistance on a digital-only future makes so much more sense. They want to control any and all access to their products and don't want them changing hands IRL.

[–] tehBishop@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's even a little worst than parent post makes it seem, it's worth a read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Wow! I remember the thing but never knew all the dirty deals.

Steve Heckler's quote on Napster sounds like Churchill after Dunkirk, "...we shall fight the users, we shall fight in the firewalls, we shall fight the cable companies and the phone companies, we shall fuck up your PC; we shall never surrender..."

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 151 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

I really hope one day people will look back at those practices the same way we look back at the normality of cigarettes being pushed on everyone back in the 50's.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Imagine believing that they need "AI" to record us.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These TVs don't incorporate enough power to do any kind of serious LLM. The "AI" they're referring to here is likely an embedded speech-to-text engine. And that probably is pretty necessary for this--it would take too much data to send actual recordings to Samsung, but text transcripts are tiny and easier to search and index. It's easy to forget, but reliable speech-to-text has been around less than 20 years, and the tiny ones that can run on embedded chips are even newer.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Stm32 has made micro controllers with neural processors for years now and you don't need LLMs to do a lot of useful stuff for a spyware company. A small model can run even in really constrained hardware if you train it specifically for it. Afaik the STM32 ones are for machine vision processing on limited hardware where power is a concern. I'm sure you can do a lot more with a TV with constant power.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's exactly the distinction I was making. The person I was replying to said "Imagine believing that they need “AI” to record us." I was clarifying that this isn't the AI we hear so much about that requires huge datacenters; it's the kind of simple, embedded, "edge" AI that you can do with whatever microcontroller you have lying around.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I know I was agreeing with you

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, sorry. Sometimes I can't tell because of the threading here.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its ok, text is also really ambiguous so I don't blame you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

They're using a classifier to capture metadata (like “does a dog live there?” or “does a baby live there”) by categorizing sounds. That's all technically legal, that's why they do it that way.

load more comments (1 replies)

This is why I have a Sony TV, it doesn't listen to me of that I can garuntee. This is a shitpost, the TV is from 98 and weighs like 70 pounds.

[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I'm happy with my $200 non-wifiable Insignia and hope it lasts a long time.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unregulated chaebols are just as dangerous as Kim Jong Un.

[–] stein2027@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (8 children)

If these tvs are capturing private conversations for advertising, where’s the consent for that?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

It's all in the EULA no one can opt out of, and no one reads, and they can change at any time.

You can blame companies who make hardware, but the laws on privacy are terrible.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

EULA has T&C that the first users agree to when they fast forward with the accept accept accept accept screens

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Doesn't matter if you technically consent, that shit is still illegal (at least in the EU)

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 28 points 1 day ago

Illegal only applies when the law is an enforced deterrence. If the fine is low enough, it's the price of doing business. If it's hard to sue or there's no enforcement, the law may as well not exist. Unfortunately, with these large companies it's been both: low fines and long lawsuits, so by the time they pay a fine, they have earned 100x the fine in a month or so

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Legality is pointless when the laws are not enforced.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Those things aren't legally valid for consumer electronics or software in many countries (possibly most of the World) because they're considered an attempt at forcing a change in the terms of the sale after the sale.

They would be totally valid if they're presented to the buyer for confirming acceptance during the purchase BEFORE they pay which, "curiously", they never are.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Drink verification can!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (27 children)

Look AI code gets a ton of hate. And rightfully so. But you can use a coding agent to basically completely take control of hardware you own. It takes minutes.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Could you go into more detail for those of us who don't want to brick their tv? I think you're over estimating some of our knowledge base.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Was watching gamers nexus. Opened up codex. Gave it network permissions. It was able to fully take control of the TV in minutes. It even navigated to the admin panel and gave me the code to plug in. Very quickly had figured out some of the major API's. In a half hour, I was able to get a container/ program set up to just "send" any stream I wanted to the TV without having to use any Samsung services. Then, scramble/ poison telemetry data/ advertising data. Whatever you like. None of it is worth publishing. But I wanted to control the TV I bought. The one I own. In my house. That I paid for. And I think its royally fucked up the world we live in that there are any barriers to that.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Just don't use OpenAI or Anthropic cloud models for reverse engineering your TV's APIs. This guy got banned from OpenAI for doing this research on his Samsung TV, and there are reports of Anthropic models starting to refuse reverse engineering tasks, having been given new guidance. Apparently proles learning about the corporate surveillance they're under is a step too far.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There’s a repo with ready-made APKs for many TV models: https://github.com/Gathin23/cleanyourtv

And if your specific one isn’t supported, it has instructions how to do it with AI yourself

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›