this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
486 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

33796 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

As someone that uses AI at work because 1. this is a run-out-the-clock situation, and 2. I don’t give a fuck and would like to be at my desk as little as possible, it feels weird and hypocritical to expect no AI in all of the software around me as well.

With that said, if I still had any semblance of passion for writing code, which I do not, anything I worked on for the OSS community would be fully devoid of AI usage. But I’m mentally at a point where I’d rather move to a cabin and use computers less and less with each passing day.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

No, coding should be done to garner clout, so eventually when I start my shitcoin, I can rugpull more people! /j

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

What is the accelerating rise of m-dashes from approximately 2014-2019 about? That trend apparently continued until very recently, even slowed down a bit, before exploding at some point in 2025 or 2026 for obvious reasons.

Does anyone have a theory?

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If the graph is not just using made up data, then it also measures absolute em-dashes, not em-dash density, so possibly could be an increase in interest in contributing to the kernel?

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

By a factor of roughly 10-fold? Maybe. It could indeed be a measure of overal absolute contribution. But post 2025 that could be influenced by m-dash density especially.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 1 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

No, the comment I responded to was about the ~2014 uptick, not the recent one.

The recent one is obviously AI one way or another. Absolute contribution rate is higher due to AI as well.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Yeah sure, no I am not surprised about post 2025. My question was indeed about the post 2014 uptick.

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 18 minutes ago (1 children)

People slowly learned to use their keyboards for proper typography?

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 2 points 12 minutes ago

That was a good one.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

The OP graph is just absolute count on the y axis, so I also assumed it was basically measuring LoC, but looking at this chart, the em-dashes do appear to be definitely more of a modern phenomenon compared to raw LoC:

Maybe some policy/tooling change around 2014? A guess is perhaps something to do with allowing UTF-8 in source files, but that's a pretty long shot.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago

Looking at that, the lines of code cannot really be the full story. M-dash count really just appears to rise from 2014 onwards.

[–] m532@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I assume it's due to phone keyboards.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think a lot of kernel devs are programming on their phone

[–] programmerlexi@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 hours ago

That's why the number was low before.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social 21 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Emdashes on this chart are the Jaws theme of vibeshittification.

—

—

—
—

——
——

——
——
——
——

—— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— ——

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 51 points 5 hours ago (21 children)

You can get a lot done when you've got 29 months in a year

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›