This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
If you’re looking to switch to a new provider, may I recommend my own service, Port87. We don’t use AI at all:
https://port87.com/2026/10/we-dont-use-ai/
It’s also a good idea to use a custom domain for your email, because there is always a risk that a provider you like today, you won’t like tomorrow. Custom domains make it much easier to switch to a new provider.
Thanks for the link. It looks interesting!
Anyone that unironically uses the word "loser" to try to motivate a policy by mocking the opposite, is not mature or responsible enough to be in a position of power.
Also, mocking instead of giving technical reasons only happens when you are not right but want to win the argument anyway.
So yeah, he just outed himself as not fit for any manager position, worst of all a CEO.
People saying they will go back if he steps down, I think this kind of is a wake up call on the company using privacy not seriously but as a marketing gimmick.
I would stay away from them. Surprise surprise, another YouTube advertised product that is shit....
What even is the alternative, I don’t see any other privacy focused company that is directly trying to tackle the g suite with an email+storage+office combo.
Sure we have mailbox.org, cryptpad, and other specific privacy cloud providers, but none of them have them all in combination.
There's an argument to not have an all-in-one provider though: it increases vendor lock-in. If a company turns into a direction you don't like, you'd have to find a suitable alternative to replace all of your services, and that takes a lot of time and effort. If you spread it between multiple companies however, you'll only need to switch a few, maybe even have less work if you use a domain (for example for custom aliases).
Plus, something about Proton I disliked is that their products are missing key features you just expect from your products. For example, every mail provider offers you the option to add todo-lists or even journals, because WebDAV just has it, however Proton still lacks that to my knowledge. Other password safe programs have a folder system to better organise your entries. Proton Pass does not. I'd rather use many companies that each does one thing well than one that does everything rather mediocre.
Andy Yen is so desperate to become a tech bro oligarch like all of his role models. You lead a non-profit, dickhead, act like it.
Please remember something very important everyone: The company may have changed its policy, but the company that made the policy hasn't changed. The people that made the bad decisions are still in charge, and the priorities that made them make that decision are still the same. They haven't changed.
This is relevant not just for Proton, but about every time company pretends to step back from a bad decision.
The way they interpret bad press is never, "my idea is bad." Instead, they think, "my idea was misunderstood."
So until the people change, they same kinda of policies will continue to be pushed until they stumble upon a way to present it that doesn't generate loud resistance.
Absolutely, these people only care about the "image", they'll say anything without changing anything
I've been slow to transition away from Google products but I gotta say... to make an effort to ditch Google and then have THIS happen to you? I feel bad for those people. I really do... You do the right thing and get slapped in the face. Not fair.
I'm glad I listened to the People arround here, who said to not lay all of your eggs in a single basket. Thats the reason why I skipped proton and use VPN and Mail from different companies now.
Anyone trying to ditch Google for principled reasons, not just annoyance or fashion, skipped proton. Since their inception they stink of corporate BS. It was apparent from the beginning that the privacy push was just a coat of paint. They still belong to the oppressor class and will defend their own, despite of what the marketing says. Always look at actions, not pretty marketing and fancy manifestos.
Is this the same Guy that has already said some Trump aligned stuff? I forget the specifics.
He said it himself: it's important to win on appearances before technical stuff, or something like that. He's definitely going to push that again; or keep doing it even now, but in a more discreet manner.
"We're not making money fast enough so let's alienate our core userbase and create a toxic work environment! That will surely be a success!"
Making money hasn't been the goal for some time. Fascists have realized that the planet won't be able to sustain more than ~1billion people, very soon. They are hogging resources, land, water, etc through datacenters and other means to become the judge of who lives and who dies. And they will decide based on "eugenical" (aka racist, ableist, other-ist) factors for the plebs, and of course every CEO and investor wants to be on the panel instead of being judged by the panel. That's why the seemingly panicky decisions.
They are right about the planet.
It's on us to get to 1billion through more peaceful, controlled, multi-generational ways for the common people, and starting by punishing fascist behavior with the necessary consequences.
This 100% actually stopped me from moving my mail hosting to Proton. I'm looking at Tuta now and alternatives. And it's not even the AI stuff so much as his insane toxic behaviour towards his people...the AI psychosis is almost secondary...
Protons CEO is a weapons grade assclown.
He seems like the waste byproduct of real tech bro oligarchs.
Well put
ready to move my entire family once again to secria. hopefully it won't implode right away after the switch
So, funny story that might be related. Engineers directed by their management to tokenmaxx often will just prompt very complex, difficult tasks to drive up their token usage.
Using the metric as the goal is a great way to give perverse incentives. SEE ALSO the US Stock Exchange.
Giving devs metrics and targets is just so dumb.
Their job is to learn the rules to manipulate systems to their benefit.
If you hand them some half-cooked system they're going to work out how to (best case scenario) bend it out of their way.
Worst case scenario is that they bend it to their benefit, and find a way to do less work for the same "score".
Everyone needs metrics and targets, otherwise it is just dicking around and nothing useful gets done.
The problem it that tech bros only half listened in social sciences class and choose the dumbest metrics and targets. Agile completely killed waterfall and specification development. In turn, using the equivalent of ignorance of the masses ticket systems on Jira. The worst of all worlds with commits, PRs and lines of code as metrics and a vacuous tick mark on user stories as goals. No wonder software development has been hell for decades.
Software developers need to stop designing in the code and go back to designing on paper against specifications and unit tests. Thinking has always been the main work of a software developer, not just writing code. As for the AI side of the problem, the purpose of code is not just to be written, but to be read and understood by humans. AI coding trashes the ontological purpose for the existence of code.
Middle managers like to set targets and goals because it counts towards their bonus, and it looks less like they've got their dick in their hand when the boss comes calling.
No one "needs" anything to do their job. A brief is helpful, a deadline is worth taking note of, but anything else is just interfering with people who are genuinely there to just do the job.
Most productive jobs i ever had? The ones where i was asked to do something and then allowed to do it.
As to the latter part of your message, it feels like you're just trying to process something so i think I'll just leave you to it. It's a bit too non-specific to respond to though.
Middle managers like to set targets and goals because it counts towards their bonus, and it looks less like they’ve got their dick in their hand when the boss comes calling.
It's the same problem all over. Capitalism. You have people who don't do work keeping the benefits from the work.
Most people aren't going to give themselves stupid or useless metrics. Software people aren't going to impose "tokens used" or "lines of code" metrics on themselves. They know those are stupid.
People need a metric shitton of things to do their job well. When you're told what to do, that's a goal. If you're told a deadline to fulfill, that's a metric.
I understand that people have taken the words in an exclusively derogatory mode. But you need minimum those two things to do any job. Else you're just a nepo dickhead who gets paid for parading around an office and you're the piece of shit interfering with the people who actually do have jobs to do.
People need a metric shitton of things to do their job well
That's hyperbole. There's a lot of things that would help a great deal, but can he done without.
When you're told what to do, that's a goal
No, thats a brief. A goal is "the dashboard released on time"
If you're told a deadline to fulfill, that's a metric
That's a goal. A metric is "1000 lines of code" or "300 sprint points"
But you need minimum those two things to do any job
Nope. That job where a team of 3 was running like 5 websites was self-run. The CEO came to us with questions and briefs and the rest of the team made requests, and we prioritised them and did them in the most efficient order possible.
paid for parading around an office and you're the piece of shit interfering with the people who actually do have jobs to do.
Sounds like management to me. Nothing produced but complaints, meetings and powerpoints.
Yeah, getting metrics on software development has always been a problem from the first time people were writing code in the employ of a business.
Businesses love metrics. Put them on spreadsheet makes some graphs, that's what some people do as their job.
The problem is you can't actually measure the productivity of someone that's doing something that's never been done before. Software development is always about doing things that haven't been done before. If you want the same software, you just copy it, you don't need a developer. You only need a developer to make the software do something it doesn't currently do, which means having someone do something they've never done before.
You just can't measure the productivity on that. But businesses want to have some numbers, so they chuck whatever numbers they have into a spreadsheet.
So what does that mean going forward? Going forward, I'm still going to push,” he added.
So going forward, I mean to be going forward.
If there was any job LLM AI were best suited to replace, it's these tech CEOs
For years I've been convinced that most CEOs can be replaced by a "magic 8 ball" or a dice and it will be all the same or better.
So yeah, doing it with a slightly less random thing could be fine.
Oh god yes, I can't tell you how many times i've seen execs in general come in and confidently peddle their motivational crap and ethos only to be proven wrong 2 weeks later and having to backtrack and reframe their messaging with absolutely no consequences. But they only do that from peer pressure not because they actually believe they're wrong, often exactly as the proton ceo did, saying they still want to push forward just in a different way. These people are unembarrassable and you can only get away from them if you quit or wait for them to quit and be fired, there's no reforming.
I just double checked (while canceling this years subscription) and I’ve been paying for proton for 10 years. I put in my cancellation notes that Andy is the reason I’m canceling and I won’t reconsider until he’s replaced.
This does very little to convice me to not migrate away.
My #1 issue was them sacrificing Security for Speed and this latest change does jack shit to address it
