this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2026
227 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

89355 readers
3157 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elgordino@fedia.io 31 points 18 hours ago

A global distributed AI network using currently unused local RAM, should put Altman’s concerns about efficiently to bed. I’m sure he’s absolutely delighted.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that bad for the big US AI companies? The only thing they are doing that actually makes money is selling their inference service on their private models and they need to make a much larger profit on it to even start paying off the interest on the debt they have accrued on infrastructure and training costs.

This is in my opinion why there is all the scare mongering to try and lock out open weight competition to prevent decoupling inference from the models being run. Otherwise inference just becomes a low margin utility service and the big tech companies that have bet big on AI lose big.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Yes, it is. Their costs aren't going down, only what they can charge and they struggle to be profitable already now. Their only hope is outlawing open models from frontier applications and coding.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 31 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I think they are just subsidizing to gain users before the IPO though, no?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

That‘s my guess too. Anthropic‘s business model was abysmal already but now the IPO looks like a really bad Ponzi scheme that is guaranteed to lose your money.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 5 points 16 hours ago

You mean subsidizing even harder - there have been absolutely no technological advances that would allow for a price drop of 77%, especially with inflation calculated in. This is the equivalent of your crack dealer giving you 4 times the drugs for your money to ensure you and your whole community get hooked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 9 points 19 hours ago

Cheaper Tokens is a good thing. Maybe not for people who want to sell them to you, but if you buy them, that is awesome

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›