this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

15537 readers
271 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
09-03 SNW 4x07 “Like Chronitons Through the Hourglass”
09-10 SNW 4x08 “Orders of Magnitude”
09-17 SNW 4x09 "Once La’An a Time"
09-24 SNW 4x10 "Tomorrow's Enterprise"
03-?? SFA 2x01 TBA

Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi! After reading opinions for a long time, I've realized that some episodes are quite controversial nowadays. For example, Star Trek: Voyager Season 4, Episode 17, "Retrospect," has been compared to the #MeToo movement, with some people criticizing how it "handles rape culture unevenly" (as one IMDb review puts it).

This got me thinking: What other things do you feel Star Trek make wrong?

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It would ruin the concept, so I get why they don't tackle the topic, but:

The federation, particularly humanity inside of the federation, is run by essentially a military government. There are elections, probably, we never really get to see them, and the decision making process of the admirals is not shown to the viewer, for world building and story telling reasons. The admirals are the problem posers, the calls to adventure, the exposition. "Go there, do this, top secret, very important, blah blah".

They don't do misuse them in lore, that much, but even the lesser capable space ships are enormously dangerous. If I recall correctly, there are even some mentions of not being regularly allowed to warp inside solar system boundaries. The risk of misuse or accidents is unimaginable. I'm pretty sure humanity has resigned itself to being ruled by some admiralty board that could order to vaporize the planet. They're not going to do that, but the implication is certainly... looming.


I also really don't like how they changed styles after the 80s/90s series. The perceived need to reinvent themselves has yielded mostly bad results. Only "Strange New Worlds" is tolerable, because it's well done, but it's still "too much" in my opinion. The special effects are nice, but there was no need to design corridors like that.

Same for uniforms. Look at how much "the suit" has changed since the 1870s. Barely at all.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Eh, any spaceship capable of even approaching warp speed is a potential star-killer. Like in a very physical sense those ships each have the ability to kill all life within a solar system.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] neidu4@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cuchi@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I personally like first season of TNG, people usually overhate the two first season of TNG.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

edit I misread, these are minor things. My actual answer is Star Trek has never put enough women in decision making positions in the creation of Star Trek and all of Star Trek's success is despite that.

spoiler


  1. Bicycles, where the fuck are all the bicycles? The last transportation anyone would choose to use when we could teleport everywhere would be bicycles because they are pleasant af, they are also super useful for exploring planets. I get filming people on bicycles "doesn't look cool" but it annoys me. Also put all the power density of spaceships into an electric bicycle? It would go for years and years and years on a charge...

  2. Where are all the dogs? For the humans but also space dogs should probably be far more common, do you really think humans are alone in domesticating dogs to get an edge?

  3. Spaceships would have lots of board games on them and people would be obsessed with them, far more than the holodecks necessarily. Star Trek sort of does this with the poker table meetups that happen in TNG.

  4. Spaceships, especially long haul ones, would ALL unless they were purely military ships have a garden/park section in them where real native plants were grown from the aliens homeplanet. This would be necessary for mental health as a place crew could go.

  5. Teleporting is too easy without enough costs, so storytelling always has to justify itself around not being able to use teleporting to solve the issue.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  1. Well, we got the TNG crew in a dune buggy at least, but you're right, mountain bikes would be way better exploring rando planets.
  2. Klingons have targs, right?
  3. How many eps across all the shows did they show Kaltoh, 3D Chess, etc?
  4. Didn't Keiko maintain one in the Enterprise and then eventually converted space on DS9 into one?
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

4 - garden areas were shown in a few places, and any tech Trekkie can tell you that even schematics of early ships had such places.

Page seven showing the botany level

1701-D blueprints had a lot more, being a bigger ship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For 3 they sort of did, but the entire show is stuck in a boomer mentality that video games are a kind of a meaningless drug or distraction unless it is chess or heavily chess coded and a symbol for masculine intelligence.

Whatever it is just games are magic because all you need is another human and time to discover new things and unfold a rich experience and both are in abundance on a starship journeying through space.

edit I appreciate the thorough response but if I were to write scifi the garden/small park space would be a part of virtually ever spacefaring civilizations spacecraft, for health (for humans even just seeing pictures of plants improves our health), for cultural and spiritual reasons, for a sense of home and rhythm.... There would be a thousand names for these spaces, maybe we humans would use "heart" or something like it to refer to that part of a spaceship but it would not be our idea, it would be highly unusual not to find analogs in other alien spacefaring species within their ships for the same reasons.

Additionally I would include as a scifi author the nuance and ethics around how pirates might board your ship and steal all your valuables but arbitrarily destroying the "heart" or garden even for pirates would be considered especially heinous as no matter who you are in space the thought of not being around plants, even if you are doomed to die or especially if you are, is kind of scarier than almost anything else if you are unfathomably far from home.

I don't know, call me weird or just a nature lover but I firmly believe having a "heart" to a deep space spaceship is just as important as having a faster than light drive.... which leads thematically into a natural justification for why shuttlecraft are capable of FTL travel but people still rely on big ships unlike say Star Wars where smaller ships are used for long distance tansportation just as much as big ones are.

It all ties back into the basic thematic fantasy of scifi that we can "leave earth and expand" is a twisted lie, we can only bring earth with us to new places, if we extract ourselves from earth truly, we die, we are not islands biologically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crowcore_explorer@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

not sure if this has been discussed by the actresses or anyone familiar with the behind scenes situation, but what was with casting a chinese-american and korean-american as japanese women? given the how the imperial aspirations of japan had such a brutalizing affect on those nations, i still find this culturally tone deaf. why did the characters have to be japanese?

referring, of course to keiko o'brien and hoshi sato.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Justifying the no money situation. Which DS9's 'In the Cards' highlights as not making any sense.

[–] kabutor@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

Money always is a problem, Boimler wins a lot of money playing on DS9 and he doesn't care at all. It's not realistic having some characters had a strong motivation with money and other don't care.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Riker kills a guy for looking like him.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You mean his clone? He didn't kill it, right?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In "Up the Long Ladder" some clones were made of him. He vaporized them.

They shouldn't have been made without his permission like that, but I also think there was definitely something skeevy about him killing them. There was a significant unaddressed issue here, and so I'd count this as "handling it poorly."

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, it does count as handling it poorly.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not Thomas Riker - the clone from "Up The Long Ladder."

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I completly forgot the plot of that episode.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It's definitely not the first problematic aspect people think of.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

He doesn't kill Tom.

I really do hate "Retrospect".

But I think my answer to the question is "evolution."

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i harp on this a lot but Enterprise's Cogenitor is a deeply distriburing episode that everyone involved with should be ashamed of

[–] gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that the one where Phlox convinces Archer to do a genocide? Because that episode was genuinely fucked

[–] MadameBisaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

No its the one with the sex slave

And dont forget the one there archer was drugged into believing murdering babies is not fine...

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cuchi@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What thinkg in specific about "languages"? Fedearation languages like the fact every human speak english or "federation standard"? Or Klingon language and some other?

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's well established that everyone wears universal translators. The weirdest thing is when they can seemingly turn other people's off at will and choose to speak Klingon aloud without it being translated.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

In theory is because badwords or knowed terms are heared literally instead of translated, most of the time that's the reason.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›