this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
33 points (62.6% liked)

Technology

89639 readers
2604 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 00000@reddthat.com 110 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

This was fake news the first 900 times it was posted, and still is. France doesn't "plan" this. 10 fringe people with no power or influence suggested it. Everyone has already rejected it.

Again, here is the real story behind the sensationalized headlines https://tech-insider.org/french-lawmakers-per-gigabyte-internet-traffic-tax-11-10-vote-2026/

Headlines called it an approval, and technically it was. But the vote covered one amendment during the first reading of the 2027 finance bill, only 35 of the Assembly’s 577 deputies took part, and the government opposed it. Nothing here is law.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Thank you for the fact check. Lemmy has a serious issue with bogus sensationalized headlines with no context offered.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

This has been standard operational procedure for some other governments around the world: transpire that some outlandish law is being considered, wait for the wave of indignation, get what you wanted to regulate in the first place approved while the people wave their pitchforks. Rinse and repeat.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

What a comically bad idea.

That tax is 1) going to just be a drag on everything IT, and 2) that is a higher tax than bandwidth costs, by a pretty good margin.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago

bandwidth at the scale of a large isp costs one to a few pennies per megabit/sec per month to deliver.

you can download about 325 gigabytes in a month with 1 megabit/sec speed.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

They think it's some brilliant scheme against big tech, when really it's so obvious that they're just going to tack the tax onto the users bill. French Netflix users will now have a "usage tax" on every bill, guaranteed.

It's exactly the same thinking as the tarriffs. They think businesses will eat that cost and protect the customers? BS they will they'll pass it on down.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Setting aside economic impact, I'm skeptical that this is actually a good idea, purely in terms of political capital.

Like...here in the US, gas taxes have a wildly-disproportionate political impact, in part because they're constantly thrown in your face. Signs all over outdoors with them.

If every time a French user of Steam, say, wants to download a game that they already bought and they're presented with a fee from Steam or something, I think that that's probably going to make the tax highly-visible to French voters, and probably unpopular.

It looks like Call of Duty is over 1TB. Okay, so Valve is probably telling you to pay your 55 euro or whatever French Internet Tax every time you want to install the game. That's probably going to generate upset pretty quickly.

[–] trojanbark@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The lawmakers are all rich so they do not care

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 19 points 5 days ago

How am I supposed to download anything if the government takes 5.5%? The checksums will not match!

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is such a bad idea, though it is funny to imagine people smuggling in hard drives like they are narcotics to avoid the crazy data tax. If this took off Physical games would be even more valuable, what a great time for Sony and MS to kill them!!

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 3 points 5 days ago

This could finally bring back LAN parties!!

[–] rosahaj@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Initiative to make it exhorbitantly expensive to request user data from services?
I shudder to imagine what using Google takeout would be like under this.

Good job France for emboldening American big tech's market domination, I guess.

[–] o8bepbua9@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Plus it would open the door for even more tracking.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 4 points 5 days ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If that goes through, it's going to make local caching a lot more financially-appealing in France.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

Imagine if programs were built for efficiency again....

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does this mean they'll actually market plans in the gigabyte instead of the misleading gigabit?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Gigabit makes more sense