Normally it is:
divide and conquer
But those want:
divide (yourself) and get conquered (more easily)
I would advise against it, but that is just my opinion.
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
Normally it is:
divide and conquer
But those want:
divide (yourself) and get conquered (more easily)
I would advise against it, but that is just my opinion.
Yeah, the far left (along with the far right) is fully in line with its headquarters in Beijing and Moscow ...
The far left in Spain also voted to leave NATO (the motion didn't pass). One of many reasons why I will not vote for them.
Good luck lowering the GDP spending for defence while leaving NATO at the same time. I understand France is a nuclear power, but it's less strong than US, Russia or China. Also, how are they gonna maintain all the nuclear arsenal?
The nuclear arsenal is expensive but it was maintained and modernized just fine when we were barely spending 2%, we don't need to compete against China or the US for it to be sufficient
Not that leaving NATO anytime soon is even close to being reasonable
I saw that you're actually investing more into your nuclear capabilities tho, like that submarine that was launched earlier this year. Besides that, there's a lot of stuff that changed in warfare since everyone was spending 2%. And now others have increased their spending as well. It does suck, indeed, but it is what it is.
That submarine was planned for and built under the 2% budget. What wasn't is the announced warhead count increase, which probably wouldn't have happened under the previous spending target, going from 290 to an undisclosed number.
Right, I see. Thank you for the insight!
This dude wants a wealth tax, but also to get out of NATO. One I really like. The other, I really don't.
the only issue with NATO is Article 1. Waive that requirement and it would be perfect.
Not sure why this is even mentioned, he doesn’t have any chance to win
Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit!