That is oddly specific
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
23 points (76.7% liked)
No Stupid Questions
50593 readers
498 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Purely hypothetical for a friend
Manhunts are never about safety of the public. They happen because escapes make the cops look bad.
I bet it's also exciting for the cops to engage in.
Especially the part where they get away with torture after
Third DWI? You should be forced into a program cause you have a problem ... also, your vehicle should be crushed so you can't drive drunk a 4th time.
Ok lets then just say a 1/2 ounce of pot.
Driving under the influence of booze, pot, or lack of sleep is still impaired. You are going to get someone hurt or dead.
You're not wrong, but I think they're just trying to give examples that aren't automatic life sentences.
Ok jesus. Let's say he's walking down the street while high and have a half ounce. The DWI was just an example.
Get off the street, jaywalking is a misdemeanor.
Why can't you just commit crimes sober, like a normal person?!
BECAUSE LIFE SUCKS ENOUGH THAT I HAVE TO COMMIT CRIMES SO IM GOING TO GET HIGH, damn it
Yeah alright, that's fair.
You seem to be giving a lot of deference to the police in this. In case you didn't know, they lie.
I'm fully aware what cops are like. What about the hospital staff doing the blood test? Do they also lie?
Sometimes, yes. A large amount of the time in fact. You obviously have never been without health insurance, and with only good insurance if you don't know that.
But the law as written is dishonest. and geared for the most incapable. Neverminding the latter, Marijuana for instance, has a level that makes anyone driving within a week or two of smoking guilty, at the polices' pleasure, of driving intoxicated. Even legal states, it's still like 4 ng/ml of blood, an infetestimally low amount, before legalization any amount would suffice, and they round up to 1 ng/ml even though the false positives on amounts that low are 40%. Tylenol is one source of the false positives but I digress.
The law is dishonest, and medical personnel are often as well though many are not, the system and laws themselves are dishonest, and that leads to even the honest medical personnel following the rules giving inaccurate information. If they told the truth in some cases, they would be drummed out of the corp in fact.
We could talk all day about this in fact.
I've never had health insurance.
Also, when assumptions start, the conversation ends.
Not much of a conversation on your part though is there? You found one part to disagree with, and didn't answer any of my points.
Which is how they, the oligarchy, et al, teach partizans to defeat reason.
should be forced to wear a shock collar that activates any time you travel faster than 30km/h
At least give him 35 km/h so he can ride an ebike without getting shocked.
Good rule of thumb is breaking out of jail never helps your circumstance. What does help your circumstance is to call every cop a fucking cunt when they book you after blowing a .41.
Just kidding, it does not help, they will forget to feed you for 2 days though.
Ha ha, calling the cops booking you a cunt might lead to an early death. It's south america now, nobody gives a shit. They have the power, be respectful.
Looks like someone did the statistical analysis that answers at least how soon they are likely to get recaptured (correlation not causation) at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bryce-Peterson/publication/377596204_Catch_'em_if_you_can_examining_how_often_and_how_quickly_people_who_escape_from_prisons_and_jails_are_recaptured/links/65b152979ce29c458baa3402/Catch-em-if-you-can-examining-how-often-and-how-quickly-people-who-escape-from-prisons-and-jails-are-recaptured.pdf
So going off their most comprehensive Model 4, violent vs non-violent offence does not make a statistically significant difference.
Factors predicting a statistically significant shorter time to recapture:
- Being white-skinned (i.e. for once there is a reverse-white privilege here, not sure why).
- Shorter sentence length (i.e. being in for less time actually increases the chances of eventual recapture).
- There being evidence the escape was planned (i.e. planned escapes are less likely to succeed than opportunistic ones - or maybe the good planned ones leave no evidence).
- The escape happening in summer (maybe longer daylight hours?).
- The escape happening from somewhere other than a non-secure / minimum security facility, as opposed to a secure facility or a secure or non-secure outside location like work release.
- The escape happening in a larger group (i.e. those who escape in groups are more likely to be recaptured).
- The escape happening other than from a local jail (i.e. local jail does predict a longer time to recapture).
- The escape happening in the Western region.
So I think to answer your question from that, a short sentence length for a non-violent crime doesn't reduce the time to recapture.
If I'm understanding you right that they get captured quicker in the summer than in the winter, it's because in the winter the people looking for them are eventually just like,"OK fuck it for tonight, I need hot coffee " and clock out at 430 instead of 530.
They’ll search the area, inform the public, but if only one person got out and they aren’t violent, it would probably just end up in wanted posters.
So if this so-called person can manage to get out of the country, they’re good.
However, if this person is driving drunk a third time, they should stay in jail. Maybe lose a foot or a hand.
Wanted posters? Lol wut. Never seen one irl
I see you don’t spend much time in police stations.
However, if this person is driving drunk a third time, they should stay in jail.
Getting caught a third time. Which probably means they've actually done it dozens to hundreds of times.
What about a person carrying an ounce of pot walking down the road? Everyone is so stuck on the DWI I just meant minor crimes.
DWI is not a minor crime. That's where you fucked up.
I used to know someone that was on the most wanted list in a county for DWIs. They sorta had an idea of where he was, but no one seemed to go to much trouble to get him. Eventually turned himself in months or years later (I don’t remember exactly how long it was).
It probably depends on the location and several other factors.
Depending on your location they might just release the kraken
It sounds like this person has hit rock bottom and keeps digging. They’re going to get themselves or others killed, and fleeing is only going to make all of this so much worse for everyone involved.
If it is a felony, as is the case with 3rd offense drunk driving charges in states I'm familiar with, or whatever it is, they will hunt you across the country. The feds will hunt you down for a misdemeanor I hear, especially for marijuana.
But state misdemeanor charges are a bench warrant. They wait until you show on their radar, and they won't generally extradite you farther than 100 miles.
It will be exactly like The Fugitive, starring Harrison Ford.
So all I have to do is find the one-armed man?
Order something from any of the online cannabis vendors. It will come with a letter to law enforcement that the product you have is legal hemp, not marijuana. Do what's required for the DUI. Doing anything else will teach you that the thing that seemed like a big problem was really just a medium size problem.