this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
92 points (97.9% liked)

Not The Onion

22976 readers
1055 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 8 points 30 minutes ago

Why... why would anyone want that??

I've read some fucked up shit in my time, but every now and then i have to ask, why?? what the fuck is wrong with you.

[–] robomuffin79@lemmy.world 45 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

At what point did the museum think that it was an appropriate or sensible item to have on display?

[–] Plum@lemmy.world 69 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The rest of the quote:

“I took them straight off display and have no desire to hear his name again – he has no place in my museum of horrors,” Wynd told Variety on Wednesday afternoon. “My museum is full of disgusting things but even I have limits.”

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Wouldn't they be an even better fit for a museum of horrors now?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 hour ago

Despite the name, Museum of Horror only associated with cool monster, not a real one.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 1 hour ago

There’s a Crime Museum (formerly known as the “Black Museum”) at New Scotland Yard, housing infamous murder weapons and the like. Such an exhibit may be appropriate there, if anywhere.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 1 hour ago

Sensible isn’t really what they were going for.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Russell Brand’s pubic hair is no longer on display at a London museum of curiosities

I'm sorry, his WHAT?!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 hour ago

His public chair.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 55 minutes ago
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 25 minutes ago

Disingenuous headlines suck. I'm finding I'm not even clicking on the good ones anymore due to my cynicism and the feel that good journalism has died and been replaced by "clicks for hate".

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Why didn't they try to do black magic with it? Etsy witches could use some practice.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago

even I have limits

Obviously not since he had "Russell Brand’s pubic hair" on display.