this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
689 points (84.1% liked)

Technology

73878 readers
3609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Its neither for me, i just dont like getting wrong information and AI is giving tons of it.

Also its not intelligent it just fucking sounds so

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I don't use it because I have no trust in it.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Sounds like you are not eating enough small rocks a day. You should eat 1 small rock a day.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

I just don’t have a use for it. I already am generative AI.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (13 children)

I applaud folks like this - they make a choice and stick with it. No "I'll never use AI to generate art but I vibe code to save time" hypocrisy. No "I use it to help me with maths, but I'd never use it to steal artistic work".

Just straight up "it is an environmental hazard, it is unethical, not engaging". Should be called "AI Ethicists" rather than "AI Vegans".

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No, I didn’t make it up. Although I rather wish I did, because it’s quite catchy, isn’t it?

No, it isn't, it's fucking stupid. The author was kind enough to link the source of that shitty idea, and the AI/vegan parallels are, per said article: ethical, environmental and wellness concerns.

Gee wiz, I sure never saw people with those 3 concerns in regards to anything other than veganism!!!

/s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

People who use the term "vegan" for somebody they consider extremist, ascetic, or annoying are really telling on themselves.

Side note: one of the most genius rebrands of all time was the way fake leather (which is often made from polyurethane, a type of plastic) suddenly became aspirational “vegan leather”.

Most vegan leathers are made from compostable materials, because (surprise, surprise!) many vegans are also environmentalists.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While billionaires keep using their private jets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

So normal decent human beings

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 40 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I try not to use AI at all. I am not missing out on anything.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

AI isn't the meat, jack. It's slop.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (10 children)

I want to avoid it but with google making sure that search results get worse and worse I'm in a bit of a pickle. Other search engines still feel lile they're a bit behind though

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And here i am not using it because I'm old and cranky.

[–] joe_archer@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I just don't use it because it's shit and doesn't do anything I need any better than I can do myself in the same time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

So I'm not the only one who refuses ro touch it?

Around me and everywhere it's getting insane that it feels like there's literally no one who hasn't used it or use regularly for all kinds of shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm choosing to abstain because it's shit. The ethical things are just a bonus. It produces inaccurate information and bland soulless images.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

Shitty click baity title

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

"AI vegans" media trying to put an enemy up again. Smh

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Reading this thread, I wonder if the term is intended to divide a largely environmentalist opposition.

Makes "nocoiner" seem tame by comparison.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Aigen or Aibstenant something for a term. Vegan is not right.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

ha so I'm a double vegan

[–] Waldschrat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can we please stop coming up with words that describe that we do not do a thing like it is not normal? Just like having to call yourself an atheist because you do not believe. You should call yourself a theist if you believe, because you actively do it. Call yourself what you are, do, or see fit, not what you are not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›