this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025

114 points (91.9% liked)

Memes

51930 readers

714 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

114

Always root for the underdog (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by an_onanist@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Second face should also be smiling

[–] Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah i was rooting for the Buffalo

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Moo-uigi?

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you wanna call it a “sport” you have to let both sides win and lose.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Aye, I would probably respect a hunter if he killed a grizzly or Buffalo with a handful knives in CQB. Never understood where the "thrill" is in just shooting something from afar. Especially some"thing" that's inherently more valuable than the hunter.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I suspect it's mainly to practice using guns for when they decide to use them on the unruly wage slave peasants which is why so many of the elite take up game hunting.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Lol, as if that one measly gun help then 😁

[+] mrductape@eviltoast.org -7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't hunt. Don't care for it, had no possibility to either.

But, we as a species have had thousands of years where the man went out to hunt for food for his family. This instinct is still there, even though it is no longer necessary. But I'd imagine that is the reason that hunters hunt. It's an activity we have been wired to do.

Some of us found other ways to "hunt", like gaming, or chasing work goals, basically anything that will require you to focus for a while on one single thing with a clearly defined goal to get to. But I can imagine if you are raised in family where hunting is still done, it would be easy to pick it up for yourself.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

the man went out to hunt

Myth based on modern gender roles

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah sure I get the thrill of the hunt. What I don't get is the incredible asymtery we developed in it. Shooting a lion with a sniperrifle makes no sense to me. The lion wouldn't even know from where it hit him. Of course I exaggerated with the grizzly and the knife, but isn't the thrill of any sport a fair (in theory) competition? These animals have not the slightest chance. And this slight chance is also just getting away if the hunter missed.

Shooting an animal would feel to me like fighting a toddler that is also nailed to a chair.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

TBF, if it's a humane kill, it's a single shot, and said lion won't even realize it's dead before the sound of the rifle reaches its neurons, rapidly flickering out.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everything else than that would just give me the sadism-warning-signals. Also knowing that if they'd get away with murder, they'd love to.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be great if canned/tour hunts like this shit suddenly somehow ended with the Great Divine Whitey sighting down his scope and feeling a deep spiritual connection with all his days having been lined up perfectly to produce that singular, defining moment (and that's when the expert local guide swiftly, silently puts two through his brain pan.)

Next.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Would be. I'm not great fan of keeping people alive that hurt humanity. Sadists, racists, sexists, whateverists....they all hinder us from evolving further not backwards. Especially considering it's mostly the worst exemplars of homo "sapiens" that actually procreate.

Besides,it's not just "whitey". Being pathetic isn't bound to race.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You ever heard of "big game hunters" not being white? 😶

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't say. But I also know that the majority of rich fucks also isn't black. And that maybe news wouldn't dare to show a the same news with a black hunter. For fear of being called racists.

But what I surely know is, that this species is rotten to the core. The skin color or pant's content doesn't really matter. Garbage is garbage 😁

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

No argument there. 🖖🏼

[–] terminhell@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Effeciency. I know a lot of hunters that also eat what they kill, and adhear to limits. It's a lot of work dressing and animal post kill. Also, its just stupid to hunt without a ranged weapon. Especially against larger animals.

Now, to the guys that just hunt for sport and not eat the kill...their heads belong on a wall too.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

I get that too. If I do that just for food, efficiency is key. But topic was more in line of "sports" where you just kill for no utilistic reason.

[–] mrductape@eviltoast.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not a fair game at all anymore. It's also pretty diffult to do it otherwise. No sane person will risk their live everytime they go hunt. Used to be that way, but no more.

It has gone from a necessity to something people do for sport, but there is hardly any sport to it when you can't really lose. Well, I guess you could be a really bad shot and go home with nothing?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

But that's exactly it. No sane person would do that. But, to me, no sane person would freeclimb a mountain or jump from a plane either. But yet people do love the thrill and "sport"(?) Of it. I get that. But where is the comparison to seeing a lion in your scope, pull a trigger, lion dead or dead-ish if I'm a bad shooter. Serial-killer (who admittedly love killing) rarely just shoot someone from the distance. Because the thrill of the hunt is gone.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 36 points 1 week ago

I'd say the animal is always the underdog against a high tech equipped predator.

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago

"The reasons behind the buffalo attack on the trackers remain unclear".
This journalist really don't get the basic correlation of an animal attacking back?

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How did the volume slider go under that image?

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Asking the right questions.

[–] gilgameth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Screenshot combination. For my phone it's volume down + power

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine bringing a gun to a horn fight and still loosing the fight

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Arrows are loosed, not bullets. 🙃

[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I misread it and was sad that the millionaire hunter was killed. We should invent millionaire hunters.