Man I cannot fucking wait until this stupid goddamn bubble pops
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
754 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
73878 readers
3577 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Im so tired of this stupud fucking refrain. Cause we all know how housing got so mich better after 08 and how we dont have any more dot coms and how the internet got so much better since that bubble. You people have no idea what your even asking for.
I'm gonna be ready this time, I can feel it. THIS will be the crisis from which I emerge on top. I switched to a bidet last year so there's no need to stockpile toilet paper. I've got all my tendies and match ammo in the basement ready to boogaloo, and I've got puts on SPY in the tube for when it starts to look shaky. No idea where this train is going but I'm full steam ahead and loaded for bear. A cocaine-bear.
Me too. I can then go back to 3D printing quantum blockchains out of room temperature superconductors in my private space station with Katy Perry.
I find that hard to believe right up until the point you mentioned Katy.
If she's good enough for Justin, she's good enough for me.
In other words, they want to hook up users and companies, make them dependent, and then rise up the prices severely while finding ways to process and incorporate all of the data they've gathered in ways that will probably involve automating the jobs of the users themselves.
aka enshittification
So what I am learning is that I should start vibe coding even the small scripts that are less than 10 lines.
Done. I will start doing that.
Basically, the only reason some of these vaguely functional AI tools actually work okay is because they haven't been ruined with inevitable monetisation yet.
Already the cost is quite high. A prolific year can easily burn 100usd a day in tokens and they have not even started to enshitify.
Some of the cost to run these models will come down a bit if Nvidia gets some actual competition which I'm sure will happen in the medium to long term because the hyper scalers definitely don't like paying Nvidia's AI ransom and the Chinese don't want to be beholden to a company the US can influence.
We will see which happens first.
Yes, this is part of the business model. The goal is to get everyone addicted to their service, then jack the price up to profitable margins. It's the same model Netflix and Amazon used. Bothe services lost money for over 10 years before becoming profitable.
YouTube as well.
Venture capitalism is what it's called, I think
It is not venture capitalism. Though it is fueled by venture capitalism. I am describing the type of car and you are calling it gasoline. They're most distinctly not the same thing.
However it should be noted there both a part of the same corrosion of our society. Just how automobiles that run on gasoline are a corrosion on our atmosphere.
Venture capitalism is when you give somebody money to start a business in hopes that they make it big, giving you really valuable equity for relatively little money. What you're thinking of is blitzscaling. Scale up in an unsustainable way in order to gain market dominance, so that you can use that to become profitable.
So much of the AI stuff we see today are boards reacting and worrying about being "left behind" in AI. In many cases, the goal is not to deliver value. The goal is to be able to attach a little sticker that says "AI" to their products to excite the shareholders.
Unfortunately in this case, some of the largest companies in the world haven't been able to figure out how to run AI services at a profit.
This could change any day if some more efficient hardware arrives, but until then, most of the software world is just crossing their fingers it becomes profitable one day while they light dollar bills on fire in their datacenters.
If this isn't "bubbleish" behavior I don't know what is.
I was in a local bike store looking at red tail lights yesterday.
One brand Lezyne had several versions. There was an "AI Alert" one. I looked it up and it just has a sensor to detect when you brake and it changes to a different flashing mode at that time.
Thats barely even "smart" let alone "AI".
The stupid thing is, because of this dumb claim they needed to confirm that it doesn't collect and transmit any data about your riding habits. Its a light with no connectivity other than a charging port.
The dumbfuckery is astonishing.
Isn't this just the tech industry. Run at a loss. Eat VC money. Wait. Wait.
Some how you become normalized and suddenly important Next thing you know you're raking profit.
Like the guy that has no friends who nobody really likes. He won't go away. He just sticks around. Nobody ever told him to fuck off. So he's just part of the group.
Yep, and they were helped a lot after the 2008 financial crisis when interest rates were dropped super low and loans were cheap. That's a major reason why the market has been screaming for the fed to cut the interest rate as much as possible.
after crypto, and Now AI, they will be chasing whatever faux tech that comes out next.
and then you go on linkedin and all the middle manager tech bros will hail it as the second coming.
Caveat: this applies to literally every new technology especially in the VC funded world.
Now I'm suddenly tempted to start using it. or at least coming up with a bot to keep it busy.
Holy crap, has anyone ever attempted to create an "AI fork bomb"? Go to one of these agent bots, and tell it to create accounts with the other agent code bots. These new accounts will all be told to create accounts on all the other code bots services. And do this recursively forever. So the flow would be 1 bot makes lets say 5 bots. Each of those 5 bots make 5 more bots. And each of those 5 bots make 5 more. So the total number of running bots becomes like 1 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5...
Obligatory, this is purely hypothetical, and you should never do this for legal reasons.
Sounds like a great idea, although no, commoners are not given the same privileges as capitalists. So I'm afraid there will be problems indeed.
first truly positive use for ai
when this bubble pops it's gonna be horrific.
google, meta, ms, so many more leveraged out huge investments in datacenters. nvidia is propping up whole segments of the fucking economy.
https://www.wheresyoured.at/ai-is-a-money-trap/
it'd be fun to watch if I could isolate myself from the chaos that will ensue, but we're all gonna get fucked by the aibros, it's only a question of which segment of the economy blows up first.
A lot of startups whose entire business model relies on OpenAI's small model API calls costing under $1/Mtok, are going to go bust when OpenAI finally runs out of money and ramps the cost up tenfold.
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(35 replies)
Isn't this true of like everything AI right now?
We're in the "grow a locked-in user base" part of their rollout. We'll hit the "make money" part in a year or two, and then the enshittification machine will kick into high gear.
load more comments
(64 replies)
I'm skeptical of AI coding as it exists today, and while I'm bullish on long-term prospects for AI writing software, am very dubious that simply using LLMs is going to be the answer.
However.
Startups typically do lose money. They'll burn money as they acquire a userbase
their growth phase
and transition to profitability later. I don't think "startups in area X tend to be losing money" is terribly surprising.
you're VERY justified in feeling skeptical, I'm seeing it first hand, you're correct.
I'm a consultant/freelancer and I'm booked for the rest of the year and well into the new year with jobs that pretty much consist of me reviewing and cleaning up AI slop.
Most of my clients are startups and small companies that went full in on AI and vibe coding. Now they're discovering that their attempts to save a few bucks by leveraging AI, cutting devs, etc is costing them more that what they envisioned on saving. The stuff they've built with AI doesn't scale, is full of exploits, and breaks quickly. With the recent Tea App thing many of my clients are now in a panic because they essentially did the exact same thing. They don't want their startup to be next in the news because some rando came across their house with the front door left open by AI.
the tech debt is massive, It's costing many of these places more to fix their vibe coders/AI mistakes than what it would have originally cost if they just used a solid dev team. Make no mistake, I'm charging them a good amount also.
All if it could have been avoided though. They could have continued to use their LLM's if they had all just kept a leash on it. if they dismissed the concept of vibe coding. A good chunk of it could have been avoided if the person feeding the prompts simply REVIEWED the code before hitting enter. I'm not kidding, IF they just LOOKED at what was being spat out things would be different. none of them did. they just trusted the AI to be smarter because they were lead to believe it was.
how do you book software work so far out? for some reason my software clients seem to all want their stuff yesterday
I've been doing it for like 20+ years now so I have a very solid client base and very solid referrals. All my new clients now are referred to me by previous/existing clients so it gives me the luxury of booking well in advance.
I appreciate your response!
Ok, but it isn't just startups burning money here like there's no tomorrow - it's also major industry leaders (Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Google, Nvidia, etc.) dumping hundreds of billions into infrastructure and development of a tech that has, so far, shown 0 positive returns for anyone and everyone. Everyone involved is pouring in money like it's going out of style, largely because they see this as a potential pathway to infinite profits down the line, just as long as THEY are the ones to get there first; consequences be damned. WHEN this bubble pops, not IF, it'll be messy. Extremely messy.
Ed Ziltron has a good piece regarding whether the losses are “just another startup” or something more. I am very much leaning towards “burning money at an insane rate just to give the impression of growth”.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Good. Costs is the key point to get rid of it.
view more: next ›