this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1613 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 17 points 4 days ago

The fucking gall of Albo to imply the protest movement is just empty slogans when he hasn't lifted a fucking finger, whereas members of the protest movement have put their bodies on the line to obstruct weapons exports.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference ...” Mr Albanese said.

Oh, cool, so are you planning on taking any actions, then? Anything at all?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Now, now. He probably has a concept of a sparrows fart of a plan...

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

But the prime minister refused to answer a question about whether Australia would impose further sanctions on Israel as demanded by the Greens and other pro-Palestinian campaigners.

“What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,” Mr Albanese said.

Australia previously imposed sanctions on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, two far-right Israeli ministers in Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government, who have been accused of inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

Yes, we do need "clear...actions by the Australian government". Like sanctioning an apartheid state and all of its leaders, not just two ministers. Like banning the export of weapons (and yes: parts that go into weapons are obviously weapons).

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

(and yes: parts that go into weapons are obviously weapons).

I was just importing the parts of methamphetamine officer

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 4 points 4 days ago

Non-lethal meth components, your Honour.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Like banning the export of weapons (and yes: parts that go into weapons are obviously weapons).

Wouldn't that impact the contract we have with Lockheed and relations with the US?

Has anyone else stopped supplying parts as an f35 partner country?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 4 days ago

I dunno, maybe it would. I don't give a crap. If your contract requires you to aid in a genocide, it's a shit contract and you should break it.