this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
849 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74247 readers
4204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 35 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I don't like cloudflare but it's nice that they allow people to stop AI scrapping if they want to

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 22 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

CloudFlare has become an Internet protection racket and I'm not happy about it.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's been this from the very beginning. But they don't fit the definition of a protection racket as they're not the ones attacking you if you don't pay up. So they're more like a security company that has no competitors due to the needed investment to operate.

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Cloudflare are notorious for shielding cybercrime sites. You can't even complain about abuse of Cloudflare about them, they'll just forward on your abuse complaint to the likely dodgy host of the cybercrime site. They don't even have a channel to complain to them about network abuse of their DNS services.

So they certainly are an enabler of the cybercriminals they purport to protect people from.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Any internet service provider needs to be completely neutral. Not only in their actions, but also in their liability.
Same goes for other services like payment processors.
If companies that provide content-agnostic services are allowed to policy the content, that opens the door to really nasty stuff.

You can't chop everyone's arms to stop a few people from stealing.

If they think their services are being used in a reprehensible manner, what they need to do is alert the authorities, not act like vigilantes.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

If they acted differently, they'd probably be liable for illegal activity that they proxy for (this is for example relevant for the DMCA safe harbor).

Anyhow, when on their abuse page, I have an option for "Registrar", which is used for "DNS abuse", among others.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

they're good at protecting websites but damn, having a company being MITM feels so wrong

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The shit they know. Plus their support for non-JS users or For are pure shite

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yeah, a few sites outright refuse to work because cloudflare just poops. EDIT: It was supposed to say "loops", but I'm keeping it.

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Uh, are they admitting they are trying to circumvent technological protections setup to restrict access to a system?

Isn’t that a literal computer crime?

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 42 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No-no, see. When an AI-first company does it, it's actually called courageous innovation. Crimes are for poor people

[–] silicon@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

See: Facebook/Meta

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

puts on evil hat CloudFlare should DRM their protection then DMCA Perplexity and other US based "AI" companies to oblivion. Side effect, might break the Internet.

The Internet was already ruined, cloudflare is just bandaids on top of band aids.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can't believe I've lived to see Cloudflare be the good guys

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Lesser of two bad guys maybe?

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago

They’re not. They’re using this as an excuse to become paid gatekeepers of the internet as we know it. All that’s happening is that Cloudflare is using this to menuever into position where they can say “nice traffic you’ve got there - would be a shame if something happened to it”.

AI companies are crap.

What Cloudflare is doing here is also crap.

And we’re cheering it on.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 5 points 21 hours ago

Gee that's a real removed it ain't it perplexity?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

they cant get their ai to check a box that says "I am not a robot"? I'd think thatd be a first year comp sci student level task. And robots.txt files were basically always voluntary compliance anyway.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Cloudflare actually fully fingerprints your browser and even sells that data. Thats your IP, TLS, operating system, full browser environment, installed extensions, GPU capabilities etc. It's all tracked before the box even shows up, in fact the box is there to give the runtime more time to fingerprint you.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago

Yeah and the worst part is it doesn't fucking work for the one thing it's supposed to do.

The only thing it does is stop the stupidest low effort scrapers and forces the good ones to use a browser.

[–] 5gruel@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Recaptcha v2 does way more than check if the box was checked.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/27299487

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 151 points 1 day ago (14 children)

This is a nice CloudFlare ad

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›