this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
773 points (99.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

3446 readers
159 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 113 points 2 months ago

Well the federal government is full of reality and fake news stars with no government experience. How bad could it be at the local level of it "works" on the federal level.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 101 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I'm already decided, NYT, you don't have to sell it to me.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Post is even more conservative than the Times

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Isn't it pure uncut Murdoch?

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Ew, and yes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 88 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Look at these young 30 year old babies" says the skeleton clinging to his senate desk for a second millennia

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, I'm near the top end of these ages. Glad I'm considered young again...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 67 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Political outsiders! Isn’t that what the right wanted? Drain the swamp!

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 months ago

Zero dollars received from AIPAC? These youngsters have no idea how politics work!

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

They were so caught up in finding outsiders, they forgot to check for swamp dwellers.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Drain the swamp!

They meant minorities.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 63 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

In what world is mid 30s young? I’d rather have a political cabinet of people who have to live with the consequences of their decisions, than a hundred variants of Holden Bloodfeast.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

In the world of "our median audience member is 67".

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Just a bunch of young 30 year olds. You know, the age greater than most of our founding fathers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 56 points 2 months ago

But the 17 year olds with billionaire daddies running doge are fine.

[–] guy@piefed.social 50 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Why is US politics so elitist? In the Nordics, our democracy is intended to allow for anyone to run for a political position. Government for the people, by the people?

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 months ago

How can you possibly enshrine the rights of unbridled capitalism and ensure endless extortion if you let the poors and minorities participate? Think about the profits damn it! How will the share holders survive?!?!!! For the people by the people? Don’t make me anxious. For the markets by the rich white land owning men. * sighs in American relief and comfort *

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Because US politics was created to serve wealthy slave owners, and not much has changed since.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

The people holding the seats are doing everything in their power to keep them. On both sides.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's 36-year-olds in the tech industry having difficulty finding work because they're perceived as too old.

Meanwhile we've got a succession of Presidents who are well above retirement age and people act like that's how things should be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sweet, according to the New York Post, I'm still young.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 2 months ago

privileged

Then posts photos of non-billionaires trying to enter government

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Privileged lefty radicals, huh? I thought it was poor people being lefties because they want handouts. Choose one boogeyman lol

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's part of the fascist agenda. Your opponent is both too weak and too strong

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 38 points 2 months ago

Meanwhile having a 19 year old called Big Balls ransacked the data of an entire nation for personal gain and assault workers doing essential work is no biggie.

[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We've voted celebrities in government positions with NO experience. Enough said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

God forbid the people governing are young enough to actually be affected by the long term outcomes of their policies. Almost like they have a reason to care.

Certainly wouldn't want that

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago (9 children)

what does "radicals" even mean in this context

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 20 points 2 months ago

Not fascist.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 14 points 2 months ago

That they're not republicans in disguise.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

That they believe people have rights

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

Appreciation for basic human dignity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Wow, all people who know how to find a file saved to their computer

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

30s... Young...

So I know I'm having an existential crisis over the fact that people my age are leading parties in my country, but I personally think 30 something is an age you should be able to run for political office?

I mean, I personally don't think that the modern political landscape should be like the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the 1980s.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (17 children)

The US founding fathers decided that the president has to be at least 35, which to me implies that those individuals have had some political experience before becoming president. IMO roughly half the Senate should be under 35, and a good chunk of the House of Representatives should be under 29 considering Senate terms are 6-years long.

Not that you should have to be a "career politician" before becoming president, but it's fairly common to want to show some experience at leadership/politics.

I'm not really a fan, but look at "Mayor" Pete Buttigeg. One of the biggest attacks against him when he ran was "being president is not the same as being a mayor" (meanwhile we'll elect CEOs like their experience means anything, but that's a whole other problem).

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

I see so much support for Zohran in the MSM, they keep posting his Ws.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Woah there I already supported the guy no need for the hard sell

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

A vote for Zohran is a vote for anarchy!

[–] stonedtemplepilot@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Obligatory fuck Rupert Murdoch.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

They are all almost twice the age of Elon's DOGE lackeys.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I've been saying for years we need older people running the government.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They're trying to lean on the world Privileged, but the people they need to convince he's bad already know every other option is also privileged.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TBi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Little government experience” was seen as a plus for Trump. Why not for Zohran?

Let’s shake up the system. Drain the swamp!

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

No no, but Trump has business experience, so he's obviously qualified.

He did what? To how many businesses?

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Best campaign ad I've seen on a while. Dudes got my vote! Look at those young faces. So much hope. Please please please don't get tainted by the money and power. Either our next group of leaders fix this shit hole, or we're 100% dead as a nation.

load more comments
view more: next ›