this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69346 readers
3765 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cries in only Chrome and Edge at work 😢

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah. What company wouldn't allow it?

When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

My IT department uninstalled it from my work laptop, and told me not to reinstall it because - and I quote: "The only browser IT officially supports is Google Chrome."

What makes this doubly stupid is that I'm a web developer. I literally can't test my stuff on another browser...

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would argue it's a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that's what I would mention.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

A good IT is blocking ads at a company-level. Browser extensions wouldn’t matter, and in fact, shouldn’t be allowed for the same reason.

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At large organizations you're generally not allowed to download much of anything without it passing through IT security and management first. If it's a no, it will probably stay a no.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there any firefox based browser on android where I can have easy gestures for the arrow buttons? All the firefox versions I can find require me to do this in two clicks which for the way I browse is a pain in the arse. Can I fix this somehow?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You mean swiping left up go back? Works fine for me in regular FF on Android...

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Doesn’t work for me. I don’t have “plain” android but a specific type that’s compatible with my eink screen.

Chromium gestures work fine though.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

No feature for it that I know of. They may be thinking of the swipe to change tabs support?

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/use-gestures-in-firefox-android

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google is not an IT company. It’s an advertising company. Surprised Pikachu, it blocks ad blockers.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's been an ad company for a long time, though, and blocking ad blockers is new.

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah it’s always been an ad company. And you are correct, blocking apps is new, welcome to the last stage in the ad-blocking arms race. Glad I degoogled my digital life a decade ago.

[–] JimBarbecue@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, can you tell a little bit about your stack, what apps and services do you use? Also on phone? I guess in a decade you could work that out pretty well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jk1006@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am from Germany and it is just sad how many people use these apps from shit companies without thinking, when suitable alternatives exist everywhere. Just use Firefox, it will work for 99,9% without any flaw. I would love to ditch WhatsApp, but could only convinge a few people to change to Signal. It is as easy as downloading a new app to prevent supporting Meta, but that's too much effort for many :-(

it will work for 99,9% without any flaw

Unfortunately not anymore.

And it doesn't help, that Mozilla is also slowly turning towards enshittification... (since they fired all servo devs...)

[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But ublock origin lite is by the same dev.. Not as many features but it conforms to the new rules and is still much better than not having a blocker if you use chrome or edge.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Missing critical features:

Filter lists only update with the extension, you cannot update them dynamically

No making your own filters and thus no element picker for blocking annoyances on a webpage (a feature so good apple literally baked it into safari)

No support for external lists (which means if you back up your own filters into a list you cannot easily reimport)

No changing behavior on a per site basis

A number of other features as well that are more strictly power user features but still really handy like dynamic filtering and strict blocking domains.

If you have the option stop using chrome and edge, they are some of the worst options you could choose. Even outside of adblock and manifest v3 chrome is horrendous for data harvesting bullshit and edge isn’t great. If you don’t have the option because of an overzealous it dept or whatever and are forced to use it ubo lite is your best option probably and my heart goes out to you

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm a bit confused as an Adblock Plus user, why did the ublock dev drop those features? ABP uses manifest v3 too and it still has all of those. So it's clearly not about them being impossible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] g4nd41ph@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

I've started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What problems with YouTube did you have?

[–] g4nd41ph@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something was going wrong with video playback. Unfortunately, this was about 10 years ago so I don't remember many specifics about what the problem was.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I've exclusively used firefox to watch youtube on Arch and Ubuntu for years, never had a problem so far for what it's worth. I keep a laptop in the livingroom with Arch specifically to have adblocking and piping the video out to the TV. The youtube apps are terrible on the Roku last I remember, haven't tried it in forever but I think the main reason was I didn't want to see ads anymore.

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can I have your bank account username and password?

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Nexz@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Awww, but understandable. Can I see your bank statements for the last 12 months?

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Nexz@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you do care about privacy!

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, when it comes to sharing sensitive information publicly, I do care about privacy. Especially bank information - a regular bank statement could probably be exploited for identity theft - but it's also nice to keep at least a little plausible deniability about who I am IRL (for employers and such).

When it comes to websites and browsers aggregating browsing history to use for advertising - which is what I was referring to in my original comment - no I don't care.

[–] Nexz@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

I was just being a keyboard warrior. I can imagine your stance, however it is important to be at least aware of it. As long it’s a conscious choice! Problem with big ad parties these days is that it’s so complex, it’s hard to make a properly informed decision about it. My comment about bank statements is just taking it to the extreme to make a point - no offence intended of course.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

It is 100000% a reason to split Chrome and the ad sales part of Google into different companies.

It won't solve the problem but the pressures end up being orders of magnitude different.

[–] skitazd@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Any Chromium-based browser will be in the same boat sooner or later. None of them have the resources to continue to support v2 long-term, or to support their own extension stores.

At this point the only viable alternative is Firefox and its dirivatives.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone should ditch chrome

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My fucking organization refuses to support anything but Chrome. I hate it so much.

[–] Bristingr@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brave user here. Never looked back.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the Brave CEO recently said some Trumpy shit (in case you're at all curious for the downvoting).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Upgrayedd1776@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

shows up but it is not selectable

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] kyle@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My guess is that they're doing it in waves. I've been hearing about it removed for weeks, only happened to me a few days ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›