"Binding arbitration" = "we're taking away your right to sue us"
Not something they should be allowed to do, just because being sued for illegal activities is expensive.
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)
Technology
75670 readers
3273 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Some courts have held arbitration agreements unenforceable, typically because it's a lopsided agreement.
Binding arbitration tends to fail hilariously when it happens frequently enough to start costing more than just being sued which is weirdly common.
Just got to get enough people to force them into arbitration and just drain their money.
I don't know about this agreement, but of the ones I read: They also have a mass arbitration clause, where if a threshold of people arbitrate you automatically get grouped into a class so the company doesn't have to pay nearly as much.
Fuck Indeed. They sell your data to job scammers.
Just deleted my account with their privacy deletion form: https://requests.hrtechprivacy.com/create?entity=INDEED&hl=en_US&from=privpolicy