this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34924 readers
410 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this not the reason the second amendment exists? Regards An Australian Edit: I'm not advocating for violence. More so "a well regulated militia" which could be established by protesters or Democratic Governors for genuine self defence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FryHyde@lemmy.zip 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Best and simplest answer is that technically they're still considered law enforcement. Nearly everything they're doing is constitutionally illegal, but only the courts have the right to determine that.

If we start threatening police with guns, every single nook and cranny of our legal system justifies the police murdering us. Maybe some cops would get paid leave for a few weeks, or possibly even lose their badges, but that's about it.

And then they'll use it to justify an even more inflated budget for ICE, and everything will get exponentially worse.

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So second amendment is totally useless then.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Against a government with modern weaponry? Yes.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Protesters who use violence to protect their neighbors will be killed. This is fascism. We can't use force to defend ourselves.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Because people won’t open carry when it’s against the law so they don’t get arrested. Unlike ICE, they’re following the law.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I believe open carry is illegal here in Illinois.

The meta I've heard is also that, if you're gonna brandish or draw a gun, you'd better be prepared to kill with it. I'm not prepared to die shooting cops so I don't feel like carrying. In the confusion of a gun fight I don't think I'd have much to add by shooting anyone

Like if someone told me that the 2nd amendment just causes more shootings and doesn't actually protect people on average I'd say yeah...

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

the meta youve heard js harmful.

“Brandish or draw a gun…better be prepared to kill with it.” — Normative, but the law is dead serious.

Illinois doesn’t have a standalone “brandishing” statute; threatening display can be charged as assault (often aggravated assault when a deadly weapon is involved). Separately, deadly force is only justified if you reasonably believe it’s necessary to prevent imminent death/serious bodily harm (or a forcible felony). Drawing in a way that threatens without lawful justification can be a crime.

[–] whereyaaat@lemmings.world -3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The meta I’ve heard is also that, if you’re gonna brandish or draw a gun, you’d better be prepared to kill with it.

That's dumb as fuck.

Glad I stopped trying to find logic in the average person.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

You say that, but my father, when I was I growing up, told me that the only thing you're supposed to aim a gun at is something you want to destroy.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Sounds like you're the average person.

The only reason to open carry to a protest is as a threat. But if all you do is carry then it's an empty threat. Don't make threats you're not willing to follow through on. And this is a dumb threat to try to follow through on.

Also a lot of the people who are against ICE are also against guns, which is pretty obvious. You don't need to be embedded in us politics to know this.

load more comments
view more: next ›