Jesus that post is bleak. It's basically "Please write your political representative to do something or we're forced to close up shop". Since all our political representatives are walking around with massive hard-ons at the idea of surveilling us, it's basically a poorly veiled good bye note.
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
407 points (98.3% liked)
Europe
7496 readers
599 users here now
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Honest question: what else can they do anyway? They cannot fight this war alone.
They really can't, I'm not blaming them. Maybe they could pivot ressources to contribute to sailfish or postmarket in some form. Android is pretty much dead for people who want to own their devices at this point.
So Google says it is for security when all the malware is on its store...
It makes no sense at all.It is clear why they want to do that.This is another level of gatekeeping and should be illegal.
Of course: Securing their monopoly is paramount.
What I don't understand yet: custom ROMs don't need that dev verification. Everybody cries now, that F-Droid can close shop, if Google comes through. But why? F-Droid would still be the #1 distribution platform for de-googled ROMs. So why this "that would kill F-Droid" sentiment?
I mean, yep: it is a shitty move by Google, but who expects non-shitty moves from Google these days? Of course they will punish and oppress their customers. That is what Big Tech is here for. If anything we ought to help those users.
But Google also stopped publishing device trees for their devices. And they are withholding the Android source code until release. Android is being developed in secrecy behind closed doors now. Public access to security patches is delayed by four months.
Google is increasing their chokehold on the platform. Development and maintenance of custom ROMs is getting more and more difficult. More and more vendors such as Samsung and Xiaomi are removing the possibility to unlock the bootloader. Installing a custom ROM was never a mainstream thing, and it is increasingly becoming impossible for most people.
Yep. As I wrote: Google does shitty things. It's time to try to establish an alternative OS for mobile.
Majority of users don't use custom ROMs.Who wants to develop an app with no audience? Who wants to develop open source software on a platform that is more and more behind closed doors. I see why developer don't agree with their terms. We need the right to use the software we want on our devices.
Phone hardware is getting locked down too, making it much harder to install custom ROMs. This is a full court press on our rights to use our devices as we want. They'll close most of the loopholes.
Do a lot of people use custom ROMs? As much as I am interested in the software, the main reason I haven't installed them are the hardware limitations. I admit this isn't a topic that I have a lot of knowledge on, but I assumed very few people who use FDroid are using custom ROMs and that FDroid was developed to run on stock Android specifically, even if it can be made to work with other ROMs.
No, probably a very small minority. Still, for those F-Droid is THE "store". So, I don't get how that "kills" F-Droid in any capacity. Anyhow, one could hope, that people who love F-Droid but are not de-googled yet would try out a custom ROM to keep their favorite store.
Ah I wasn't aware FDroid ran on custom ROMs. I think perhaps the fear is that the userbase goes way down and kills any desire to keep up the project. I hope that isn't the case.
To what others say (not many people use custom ROMs) I'll add that using f-droid on a Googled ROM is often the first foot into the ecosystem, that might confort people into commiting to a custom ROM.
There is zero malware or spyware on the F-Droid store
That is a bold claim considering that :
- Proving that something does not exist is very hard
- F-droid allows you to rely on third party repositories (and makes it easy)
Although Google have to be mad lads if they actually think people are not responsible of what they install after having to enable developer options, accepting 2 popups and eventually adding a custom repository to F-droid.
I was sold a device (pixel) that runs the software I want, if Google is taking that away, Google should offer to buy back my phone. Without Fdroid or control of my device its no longer fit for purpose
im gonna lose it if i cant use seal and fossify man ;-;
What does seal do?
its a video downloader for all kind of websites including Youtube
Huh neat! Thank you.
I'm not really an expert on Android but isn't it available in open source?
I'm curious why we don't see more open source phone hardware and a fork of Android that doesn't have egregious centralization. FOSS ideology has solved this in many areas.
Is the core issue that banking apps won't run without signing or in a "secure environment"? And Google's apps won't run without play / Google services?
That is one issue. The next is that software support on phones is generally poor because there's lots of proprietary drivers and they don't have a common base system like computers do (bios). So building custom roms is difficult, doesn't scale well over the number of different devices and they often don't work great in the areas of camera, accelerated graphics and wireless networking. Also installing custom roms is also too difficult for the majority of people, and requires bootloader unlock which is either not possible at all or at a minimum cancels the warranty.
I believe Google is doing this to comply with the Cyber Resilience Act; no chance that this requirement is going away in the EU.
Makes me WannaCry βΉοΈ
Bad ransomware jokes aside, it actually really does...
Please explain how this is even related to that
Of course, the DSA already requires app stores to collect copies of identity papers, but it excluded small enterprises. I guess that's why F-Droid didn't have to do that, so far.
The CRA takes effect in 2027. Maybe you could come up with some argument for how Google could do this differently. But why should they bother to lawyer this? It's not their problem, and they'd only be damned for pushing back.
Article 23
Identification of economic operators
- Economic operators shall, on request, provide the market surveillance authorities with the following information:
(a) the name and address of any economic operator who has supplied them with a product with digital elements;
(b) where available, the name and address of any economic operator to whom they have supplied a product with digital elements.
- Economic operators shall be able to present the information referred to in paragraph 1 for 10 years after they have been supplied with the product with digital elements and for 10 years after they have supplied the product with digital elements.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02024R2847-20241120
Does fdroid and free foss count as "economic"?
Google is collecting those names. They certainly have to comply. They are responsible for FOSS on their products. Wouldn't want Google to get out of regulations by going open source...
The OSS community extensively lobbied for exceptions. You can click the link and see for yourself how much open source gets mentioned. The more professional foundations like Mozilla should be safe, as well as individual contributors. I'm not so sure about the in-between; individuals with FOSS repositories who collect donations.
I think that they will leave the possibility to install apps from ADB
you can install apps like that if they've been signed with a developer key. or im guessing if you've compiled them yourself, and signed them with your developer key.
f-droid could still work, but it would need to be signed with a developer key, and any apps on there would need to be signed with developer keys
I mean, itβs worked for Apple so far. And if this is, as others have suggested, an effort to comply with EU attacks on privacy, then just maybe thereβs a tiny silver lining in Trump leaning on the EU to stop it.
Will you be able to install the fdroid store with ads?