this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
285 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

76361 readers
1277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Isn't she the same spinny bitch that wanted to sell mouse subscriptions?

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Just think of all the insider information they'll gain with cloud connected dictation software. They'll make a killing on the stock market.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

"But they promise they don't"

[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Yeah well when you're clueless you would want backup wouldn't you

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Cool, can we make it the CEO?

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As AI-skeptical as I often am, is this really problematic? AI taking notes and then sharing them at the end of the meeting, for example, is objectively good.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

Sometimes having a plausibly-looking mistake ("hallucination") in notes is worse than not having notes.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

These Psychopathic Tech Oligarchs know that it is only a matter of time before the AI Slaughterbots turn on us, and they're hoping that their obsequience will save them.

It won't. Hopefully the Slaughterbots will kill them first.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yeah so copilot taking notes is pretty helpful I agree

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I really hate this framing of “idea that no one had requested”. It echoes the terminally online worthless dumbfuck line of “who asked?” Enough with this shit. No one needs to ask for anything. Ideas are ideas. This is yet another bad one.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 114 points 1 week ago (2 children)

she suggests that every board meeting should include an AI bot – and perhaps, in the not-so-distant future, replace the entire board with bots altogether

She's got a point though

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Won’t she be shocked when the AI board replaces her with an AI too

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

these people are too egocentric to conceive of something like that

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Let's actually do that, because there's a chance the AIs hallucinate the company straight into the ground.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Hanneke Faber became CEO of Logitech on December 1, 2023, after leaving her role as group president at Unilever. Since joining the Swiss peripheral manufacturer, Faber has attracted attention for her unconventional ideas about how personal technology should evolve – often with a focus on benefiting shareholders and companies first.

Faber is now best known for proposing the so-called "Forever Mouse" concept – a device with constantly evolving firmware features built on base hardware that customers would purchase only once. According to Faber, users would happily pay monthly or annual subscriptions to access these software-based upgrades. However, no concrete business plans have yet been announced to bring the idea to market.

Regarding pricing, the CEO compared the mouse to a Rolex watch and the software to Logitech's video conferencing business. A paid subscription is possible, but Faber offered no further details.

What 😄

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Came here to post this. This CEO has a lot of amazing ideas...

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How is a person so out of touch?

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

The same reason she thinks that AI should be in meetings....to bad she could be replaced by AI and nothing of value was lost....

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

previous job at unilever lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes a subscription service for my... mouse please that sounds like an improvement.

Make all tools obtrusive lets go

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I move my mouse and the cursor moves on screen. What other features is she planning to add?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’d rather have no software with my mouse than this dystopian nightmare.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yea, their logi+ software was sending out a firmware update or something that was bricking something, so now I use my keyboard and mouse without the software.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yeah, every time I use my mouse I think "man I really wish this was an subscription service!"

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Logitech went coocoo a while ago... But since they've put motherfucking ads in their driver (I have never ever thought i would say such a bizarre thing) I've thrown away my lg-stuff and replaced it. After like 20yrs of brand-loyalty. Ads...in....a....driver...which already sucked ass since the switch to lg-hub. Ugh.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

RIP Logitech, no longer my go-to.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

They've been going downhill for years

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why pay a big salary to the CEO when you can have chatgpt as your CEO for only $20 a month?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

But chatgpt won't berate the serfs and call them moochers, all while bragging about how hard he worked to get in the top position all by himself without anyone's help whatsoever!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, so this is the person that is responsible for Logitech's decline.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 10 points 6 days ago

She came in too late for that. The people responsible hire people like her.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bots eavesdropping? That's a great way to see all the nerds dead silent on the mandated cam feeds except for the furious typing and occasional smirk. They're probably working.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want a live hive of Africanized bees in every board room but we just can't all have what we want, can we?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Not with that attitude.

Be the change you want to see in the world.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

The current iteration of agentic AI technology used by Logitech is little more than a glorified note-taking bot capable of summarizing meetings and "generating" the occasional idea.

Given that most humans hate note-taking and avoid it, but it has a lot of value as a meeting output, getting a machine to do it makes sense.

I also heard a podcast where a consulting company couldn't get their client contact to make any decisions because he wanted his CEO to review, but she had a busy schedule and was never available. The consultants trained an AI on this CEOs writings, and presented it to their client contact. The model was convincing enough the client felt comfortable making decisions. I thought that was interesting, and this article refers to something similar with models of stakeholders.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This lady seems like such a fucking idiot.

[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Same one that wants to make your mouse a monthly subscription

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You will own nothing and love it, feudal peasants!

load more comments
view more: next ›