Why pay a big salary to the CEO when you can have chatgpt as your CEO for only $20 a month?
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
285 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
76337 readers
1403 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
$20? Just ask without logging in.
$20 a month
LOFUCKINGL
But chatgpt won't berate the serfs and call them moochers, all while bragging about how hard he worked to get in the top position all by himself without anyone's help whatsoever!
The current iteration of agentic AI technology used by Logitech is little more than a glorified note-taking bot capable of summarizing meetings and "generating" the occasional idea.
Given that most humans hate note-taking and avoid it, but it has a lot of value as a meeting output, getting a machine to do it makes sense.
I also heard a podcast where a consulting company couldn't get their client contact to make any decisions because he wanted his CEO to review, but she had a busy schedule and was never available. The consultants trained an AI on this CEOs writings, and presented it to their client contact. The model was convincing enough the client felt comfortable making decisions. I thought that was interesting, and this article refers to something similar with models of stakeholders.
I want a live hive of Africanized bees in every board room but we just can't all have what we want, can we?
Not with that attitude.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Isn't she the same spinny bitch that wanted to sell mouse subscriptions?
And i want to bring a pack of dogs into meetings
Allowed, but they all need to be cuddly politeboys.
Monkey paw finger curls
Granted however the dogs are only polite to the CEO. To everyone else the dogs are murder hobos.
So chihuahuas?
This lady seems like such a fucking idiot.
Same one that wants to make your mouse a monthly subscription
You will own nothing and love it, feudal peasants!
Just think of all the insider information they'll gain with cloud connected dictation software. They'll make a killing on the stock market.
"But they promise they don't"
Yeah well when you're clueless you would want backup wouldn't you
So it can log what is being said and he can secretly try to game the market!
“Look, my model makes the best stock picks because it’s so intelligent and does lots of thinking and reasoning just like a human, that’s why we need a huge data canter bigger than the one the NSA has in Utah that records all the world’s internet traffic”
Cool, can we make it the CEO?
As AI-skeptical as I often am, is this really problematic? AI taking notes and then sharing them at the end of the meeting, for example, is objectively good.
Sometimes having a plausibly-looking mistake ("hallucination") in notes is worse than not having notes.
These Psychopathic Tech Oligarchs know that it is only a matter of time before the AI Slaughterbots turn on us, and they're hoping that their obsequience will save them.
It won't. Hopefully the Slaughterbots will kill them first.
Yeah so copilot taking notes is pretty helpful I agree
I really hate this framing of “idea that no one had requested”. It echoes the terminally online worthless dumbfuck line of “who asked?” Enough with this shit. No one needs to ask for anything. Ideas are ideas. This is yet another bad one.
she suggests that every board meeting should include an AI bot – and perhaps, in the not-so-distant future, replace the entire board with bots altogether
She's got a point though
Won’t she be shocked when the AI board replaces her with an AI too
these people are too egocentric to conceive of something like that
load more comments
(3 replies)
Hanneke Faber became CEO of Logitech on December 1, 2023, after leaving her role as group president at Unilever. Since joining the Swiss peripheral manufacturer, Faber has attracted attention for her unconventional ideas about how personal technology should evolve – often with a focus on benefiting shareholders and companies first.
Faber is now best known for proposing the so-called "Forever Mouse" concept – a device with constantly evolving firmware features built on base hardware that customers would purchase only once. According to Faber, users would happily pay monthly or annual subscriptions to access these software-based upgrades. However, no concrete business plans have yet been announced to bring the idea to market.
Regarding pricing, the CEO compared the mouse to a Rolex watch and the software to Logitech's video conferencing business. A paid subscription is possible, but Faber offered no further details.
What 😄
Yeah, every time I use my mouse I think "man I really wish this was an subscription service!"
Came here to post this. This CEO has a lot of amazing ideas...
How is a person so out of touch?
Read her bio page at Logitech. Looks like she got into a leader role because she previously had a leader role. She is in the best case some CEO who brings "value" to a company trough enshittification, but she has zero background relevant to computers, software, hardware or peripheral.
I don't see how she would have first hand experience with her product line and create better products.
isn't it funny how the folks who actually study, design, and make things earn pennies compared to the C-suit gang that takes home the lion's share for diddling with money (and kids)?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yes a subscription service for my... mouse please that sounds like an improvement.
Make all tools obtrusive lets go
load more comments
(3 replies)
I’d rather have no software with my mouse than this dystopian nightmare.
Yea, their logi+ software was sending out a firmware update or something that was bricking something, so now I use my keyboard and mouse without the software.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Logitech went coocoo a while ago... But since they've put motherfucking ads in their driver (I have never ever thought i would say such a bizarre thing) I've thrown away my lg-stuff and replaced it. After like 20yrs of brand-loyalty. Ads...in....a....driver...which already sucked ass since the switch to lg-hub. Ugh.
load more comments
(18 replies)
view more: next ›