this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
38 points (95.2% liked)

Europe

7603 readers
1034 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived

Europe, in its trade dealings with China, needs to act "in a more offensive way" to protect its own interests and those of its companies, [Germany's] Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel said.

[...]

When it comes to China, let me only say one thing: China needs Europe more than Europe needs China," Nagel, who sits on the ECB's Governing Council, said.

[...]

We are a strong economy. We are four hundred fifty million people... So we should play the European card in a more offensive way."

Nagel said Europe needed to avoid a trade war with China and should maintain a dialogue but also needed to protect its own markets.

"The point that I would like to say here is that Europe should play the cards in a way that we are more convinced about ourselves, because the most important market for the European is Europe itself," Nagel told a financial event.

[...]

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I hate Western European exceptionalism and smugness.

The EU has been a struggling empty shell of an economic project, with no vision, no progress.

EU politicians should 閉嘴 (shut up), be humble, and learn from China.

[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

delusional.

we can't keep up with better chinese products at lower prices and get protective about it. why? idk man... maybe because top-eu manufacturers only went for short term profits and shot themselves in the foot in the long run. e.g. vw and their suv market that us thinning without a plan b for affordable products

stop crying, reareange your businesses. china is not the issue here.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, who needs SUVs? No one. The problem here aren't SUVs but the Chinese government, though. Europe has been awakening of late, but it needs to get tougher.

[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

in what sense is the chinese government a big problem compared to the us with whom we try to keep good relations despite the fact they screw us over geopolitically the 1st chance they get? (they can ground ozr f35's on a whim, nordstream was a thorn in their eyes, they sanction us for trying to be digitally independet etc.)

what did china do? sell cheap ev's that compete with european manufacturers and they took over the lead in solar because european politicians stopped incentivizing innovation. wow.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the U.S. goes in the wrong direction, straight into a dictatorship. China is already there, though. I agree that Europe must be tougher.

[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

in what sense is china a dictatorship? their political system completely differs from western democracies. on a communal level it is highly democractic on a communal level and seems to look out for it´s people in general. i am no huge china fan and have my own issues with it but strictly calling it a "dictatorship" and dismissing it as a valuable partner leaves a sour taste in my mouth - something about europeans with their own problems (rise of fascism and going the same path of billionaires dictating policy like the us) thinking they are the only valid democracy.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree, there are a lot of problems in European democracies, far-right and - by now to a lesser extent, far-left - groups try to undermine the rule of law and human right. We must not forget they are supported by the Chinese party-state. It is unsurprising, as China turned to fascist rule, too.

[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the first article you mentioned just stated "political extremists like china which is bad" from a deeply western viewpoint without any critique other than "the right wingers are pragmatic and the leftists praise the central economy" and then they make a whole case that china influences both extremes on the example of one czech social media guy with little to no influence... IMO the article didn´t really have a point.

the 2nd article is really interesting because now it comes down to the definition of fascism. from my perspective fascism is a faux "grassroots movement" which mobilizes disillusioned workers to strengthen the powers that already oppress them in a pseudo-revolution - the picture of an enemy or outgroup can be used to further strengthen the movement. - the book "blackshirts and reds" by michael parenti really explained how fascism works to me now from this definition china is definetly NOT fascist as it did a lot to lift people out of poverty and enabled mass-class upwards mobility. now all these "4 hallmarks of fascism" seem like made up points. because all western countries check these boxes aswell except for the cult of personality, which has obvious historic reasons.

chinas mass surveillance is an overblown issue which requires more than a sentence to dismiss, the treatment of the uyghurs was framed as a genocide by western intelligence agencies, falun gong members and a german far right covid denier guy. and the hyper-nationalism is just a straight up lie because the official party line is to open the doors to the outside world - be it with inviting western influencers like ishowspeed for propaganda reasons or promoting tourism and business opportunities for westerners.

look at the author of the 2nd article, he really believes in american exceptionalism and has an extreme bias

news about china are riddled with false information, it is important we question all "facts" we get presented

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it is important we question all “facts” we get presented

Well, this is so true. Not exclusively, but also for China. Beijing's mass surveillance of its own citizens (China 1 surveillance camera for every 2 citizens) is a massive problem, as well as the 'influencers' covering the genocide in Xinjiang and elsewhere, as you touched it. But there are a lot more reasons. This is why we can easily agree to the linked report, it's absolutely fair to say that Europe needs to be tougher on China.

[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i think we have 2 distinctly different conclusions from this.

chinas mass surveillance is not even close to what the uk does or what european countries want with palantir and chat control and the so-called 'genocide' in xinjiang was only pushed by western far right think tanks.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

chinas mass surveillance is not even close to what the uk does or what european countries want with palantir and chat control and the so-called ‘genocide’ in xinjiang was only pushed by western far right think tanks.

Yeah, this is exactly the point. China's total control of the web and the society is far ahead with devastating consequences for the Chinese people and their freedom, and Palantir and 'chat control' is supposedly a timid step in this direction. But China is, again, far ahead. We see that in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia, for example, where several rights groups, personal witnesses, and international organizations provided ample evidence of China genocidal policies.

So, check the 'facts' you read! I don't know where you get your information, but you may search for alternative sources.

[–] Anonymaus@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree—china’s power has gone unchecked for too long. The world must stop treating us as a playground and start recognizing us as a player on the world stage.

[–] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

The world must stop treating us as a playground and start recognizing us as a player on the world stage.

True. But it's up to us to change that.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When it comes to China, let me only say one thing: China needs Europe more than Europe needs China," Nagel, who sits on the ECB's Governing Council, said.

I'm sorry, what? How is this guy so delusional?

Every time we try getting aggressive with China, they just cut exports or raise the prices and we immediately cave in. Because they don't need us and we need them. For us, China is the sole source of many goods, while for them Europe is just extra money.

Generally, the EU should be more aggressive. However, perhaps not towards a superpower it has no leverage whatsoever with. All this does is hurt both China and us, except it hurts us way more. Stop this brain dead strategy of suicide.

This is precisely why the EU is so weak at the moment. I'm all for a stronger Europe; one that could be a global superpower and dictate its own rules where appropriate and/or necessary. But this is absolutely not how we get there.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Every time we try getting aggressive with China, they just cut exports ...

If China can't sell its overcapacity to the world -and Europe is a huge market - the Chinese government would soon be in big trouble. Beijing's desperate attempts to redirect goods from the US to the EU and other regions has already been observed in recent months and are very revealing. They can't even afford 'to cut exports' for too long.

A tougher stance is definitely the best and supposedly even the only way for Europe. It's already late, but better late than never.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

If China can't sell its overcapacity to the world -and Europe is a huge market - the Chinese government would soon be in big trouble.

How so? They're richer than ever, rapidly getting even richer every year. The government is breaking records in terms of the nation's support. I'm sure they appreciate the extra income coming from Europe, but that's all it is - extra cash. They need it in the same way you need a $50 check from the government. Is it nice to get? Of course. Is it in any way necessary to fulfill your needs? You can answer this yourself.

They can't even afford 'to cut exports' for too long.

And yet, that's precisely what they do all the time, and somehow, their economy cannot stop growing, while Europe's stagnates or faces a recession.

A tougher stance is definitely the best and supposedly even the only way for Europe. It's already late, but better late than never.

Absolutely agree here. Europe has been way too submissive for decades. We definitely do need to grow some balls and toughen up. Otherwise we'll simply continue being exploited, mostly by the American Empire.

Washington has just ordered the Netherlands to completely illegally take over a Chinese chip manufacturing company, threatening them with sanctions otherwise. This has resulted in the company's employees refusing to work and China cutting exports from the Chinese branch of the company to the EU. We're losing big on this, China is losing pennies, and the US is probably gaining something. Once again, we're following the Americans' orders to our own loss. Meanwhile China is being relatively friendly when unprovoked. Who should we be hostile towards here?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

Remember the food that is thrown away. Overcapacity doesn't matter.

As long as China makes enough money to buy needed external resources, everything is ok for them.