this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
199 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

76274 readers
3175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Test scores across OECD countries peaked around 2012 and have declined since. IQ scores in many developed countries appear to be falling after rising throughout the twentieth century. Nataliya Kosmyna at MIT's Media Lab began noticing changes around two years ago when strangers started emailing her to ask if using ChatGPT could alter their brains. She posted a study in June tracking brain activity in 54 students writing essays. Those using ChatGPT showed significantly less activity in networks tied to cognitive processing and attention compared to students who wrote without digital help or used only internet search engines. Almost none could recall what they had written immediately after submitting their work. She received more than 4,000 emails afterward. Many came from teachers who reported students producing passable assignments without understanding the material. A British survey found that 92% of university students now use AI and roughly 20% have used it to write all or part of an assignment. Independent research has found that more screen time in schools correlates with worse results. Technology companies have designed products to be frictionless, removing the cognitive challenges brains need to learn. AI now allows users to outsource thinking itself.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fxleak@lemmings.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but not for the reasons this article points out.

People have been proud to be stupid and afraid of knowledge for decades.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Oh yeah? C'mere a minnit and say that to me face

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

People were ignorant in previous centuries because they didn't know better. Today they are willfully ignorant in spite of having the facts available.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

the issue with becoming more knowledgable about the world is you feel less special.

and people are desperate to feel special. our entire consumer economy is built around exploiting folks insecurities and convincing them that their purchases make them better than other people.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I could say anything is a crutch that removes the burden from our minds. Calculators remove the burden of doing basic math and map apps remove the burden of maintaining a mental map. Both of these can result in a person who can't independently do basic calculations or navigate and won't understand the methodology behind the calculations. Now if this is a problem is open to debate.

Now using AI to avoid learning is a problem since it results in fraud. "I claim I understand this but I don't."

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not me. Because I am smart.I know because I'm smart. If I were stupid, I wouldn't know. See?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 61 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

There was a Twitter exchange Erich did the screenshotted rounds a year or so ago, which went something like this:

Tweet 1:

Sometimes i spend so long crafting the perfect prompt that i realise what the solution is and don’t even have to ask ChatGPT

Tweet 2:

Bro just discovered “thinking”

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Using AI as a rubber duck is what he did. I've used you guys in that manner. Quit a couple of asklemmy posts I had started because crafting the question and explaining the issue led me to a resolution.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Yup. Makes me wonder if they teach people rubber duck debugging any more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

I guess, yes? When social engineering is stronger than free will and common sense then I'd call that gullible/stupid.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (18 children)

Looking around at my family, neighbors and coworkers getting hoodwinked by AI left and right... yeah that tracks.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 77 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

for those rolling their eyes on link aggregator linking to another link aggregator - this is the actual original article: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/18/are-we-living-in-a-golden-age-of-stupidity-technology

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And it was posted in this community recently.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 14 hours ago

My bad, I never saw it 🤷‍♂️

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 4 points 11 hours ago

We are living in the golden age of the MAGAt.

[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If this is starting post 2012, then social media is probably also to blame.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 9 points 12 hours ago

Yep, that's certainly what started it, AI just made it way worse

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 32 points 18 hours ago

From the OG Guardian article:

“It’s only software developers and drug dealers who call people users,” Kosmyna mutters at one point, frustrated at AI companies’ determination to push their products on to the public before we fully understand the psychological and cognitive costs.

I disagree for a ton of reasons but what a great line.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I want someone to do a study of people who graduate from St johns vs people from say nyu or similar and how they function in today’s society.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

the individual matters more than the education. i know several st johns graduates whose personality is yes-men. i have a liberal arts education from an ivy and 95% of my peers at uni thought it was stupid and just wanted job skills. they didn't give a fuck about learning or education, they just went there so they could get a job at goldman or similar and get rich or because their parents told them had to. they thought i was mentally ill for valuing liberal arts and focusing on education rather than getting a big fat paycheck after graduating.

a Socratic education only works if you already inclined towards skeptical inquiry. you can't educate people into skepticism, it's really an emotional disposition. normal people do not want to think anyone than they want to run marathons. only a small percentage of people are inclined to such activities.

i taught philosophy for 3 years, about 500 students. maybe a dozen of them actually learned anything... the other 490 were just there for a requirement/grade/elective and did absolutely did not give a fuck other than thinking quoting Plato make them sound smart and win arguments, or help them further entrench themselves in their delusional conspiracy mindset. had about 50% of my students actively argued for exploiting slaves for business profits, because all that mattered was their own wealth.

for every liberal atheist skeptic linux genius here on lemmy, there about a 100+ people who believe the opposite out there in the real world.

[–] giraffes@kbin.earth 3 points 8 hours ago

a Socratic education only works if you already inclined towards skeptical inquiry

Or if you just accost people in the streets like Socrates :b

I work at a top university and can confirm that the overwhelming majority of students are concerned primarily about jobs. It doesn't matter how good the school is; this is an effect of industrialization and more importantly education being reduced to a means for economic development and productivity. In my experience, it is ironically worse at the "better" schools where acceptance is highly competitive. If I'm being honest, a good community college is the sweet spot: teachers invested in teaching and students with the leisure and/or low risk/investment in just learning things for the heck of it.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Nice, thanks for sharing your experience.

I’ve only known a few go through St John’s and they are all very intelligent, yet partially disconnected from modern life, sort of like the Amish.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

A slashdot post? Is it Y2K?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

from the not-very-good-at-analogies dept

Slashdot is like a canned fart in a bottle forgotten in the attic. Open up the bottle, take a sniff.... welcome back!

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

i suspect slahdot people are quite happy in their bubble there without the facebook and other users...

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

Yes I am 😁

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, hey, what's this article about Dietrich Bonhoeffer's theory that stupidity enabled Nazis?

Hur hur... Bonhoeffer. You're mom's a Bone Hoeffer.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, I was recently introduced to Bonhoeffer, his insight is incredible and the fact that similar mistakes are taking place today.

Peter Turchin is as close to Hari Seldon I think we’ll have, his models point to a lot of turmoil in the future.

[–] Mangoguana@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Damn I was going to blame the co2 in the atmosphere

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Devo was right.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

massive inequality is not just income disparity

load more comments
view more: next ›