Wrong decision. But anyway; as the costs of climate change will start hitting them, in 3-5 years they will come to their senses and will then review this review.
Europe
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
No, in 3-5 years the German combustion engine sector is basically dead. H1 this year 30% of cars produced in Germany were BEVs and growing quickly. A lot of the suppliers fire people and close down factories related to combustion engines right now. That is a huge reason, why the German economy is in such a bad state. However it has to be done and there is an end to it.
Sodium batteries are about to drop next year at low prices... ICEs are dead.
Old tech never dies. It just decays.
There is no ban. Why does the press always reinforce those fake news?
Please just show us the finger Brussels, we are to dumb to get it otherwise.
- Israel & Palestine conflict
- US trade deal
- immigration policies
- far right ideologies
- this
It's like they're trying to stand on the wrong side of history. I guess there's the vote against Chat Control, for which they considered voting in favor of. There's also the support for Ukraine, which they have been doing half-assed.
France and Spain are against it and they have 26.1% of EU population. So they only need another 8.9% of the population to support them. So idk Portugal, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Ireland or something like that. They also need to vote for it, so abstaining is also a no.
against softening the ban? /asking for clarification
Yes they want to keep the ban as is.