this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
13 points (93.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44251 readers
499 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I need to know if I am stupid or crazy or what here...

As far as I am aware, non-prepared food items no longer have sales tax or a snack tax like they did when I was a kid. The only taxes I know I would be paying for a canned soda would be the CRV/California Redemption Tax, which is a flat $0.10 per aluminum can ($0.15 for glass bottle).

If the can of NOS is priced at $1.98, I expect the total price to be $2.08. However, the price ends up coming out to $2.21. Where the fucking hell is the other goddam $0.13 coming from? Are they charging me the fucking bag fee even when I don't get bags?

I know it is classified as a tax and not just the price being mislabeled because when I pay for it using foodstamps, I am only actually charged $1.98 period since the system automatically removes taxes from the payment (I only see this reflected by the SNAP balance, not the POS system at the store, BTW). It's still disconcerting to clearly see a discrepancy in what is attempting to be charged, tho.

Is there some other tax I am not aware of or something? Everywhere I encounter this happening does not have itemized receipts (which I find pretty scummy), so I can't just find out by looking at that.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was reading NOS as "nitrous oxide" and was very confused

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It does use the branding. It used to even come in a plastic bottle shaped like the tanks you use in a car. But this one makes your body run faster and possibly explode, instead of your car.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was more thinking of the inhalant gas used medically by dentists and otherwise known by enthusiasts as "hippie crack" or (more recently) "Galaxy gas"

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oooh, laughing gas. Now that would be a great energy drink!

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Some background: retailers in California that sell taxable goods have the choice of either including sales tax in their posted prices ("tax incl") or not ("+tax"). Whichever they choose, they must disclose which method they use and must be consistent. Retailers of tax-free goods obviously don't need to make this choice. Vending machines invariably always include the sales tax (and CRV if packaged beverage) to make the price a round number.

non-prepared food items no longer have sales tax

This is mostly correct, since the sales tax on food is generally on hot food that is otherwise unprepared. If any other preparation occurs (like with a sandwich from a sandwich shop), then that added preparation makes the whole sandwich taxable, even though the individual food ingredients would have been tax-exempt.

The only taxes I know I would be paying for a canned soda would be the CRV/California Redemption Tax, which is a flat $0.10 per aluminum can.

Minor quibble: CRV is California Redemption Value and is a refundable fee. The tiny distinction from a tax is that fees are potentially refundable (and this is, upon recycling the container) whereas a tax is virtually never refunded in any scenario. That said, the California Constitution specifies that taxes and fees have the same requirements when it comes to approving them, since the payment of a tax or fee is mandatory. But I digress.

Anyway, the rates that you described is not correct. The current rates are:

5 cents for containers less than 24 ounces

10 cents for containers 24 ounces or larger

And only applies to aluminum, glass, plastic, and bi-metal.

So on a can of NOS (16 fl oz) pays just 5 cents, but a 24 fl oz can will pay 10 cents. I'm not sure which size can you were looking at, but I'm going to guess it was a 16 fl oz can.

If 16 fl oz priced at $1.98, then add 5 cents CRV, that's $2.03. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) writes that:

Sales of noncarbonated drinks are generally not taxable, but their containers may be subject to the CRV. On the other hand, sales of carbonated and alcoholic beverages are generally taxable, and the CRV fee that is charged for their containers is taxable

And:

Under SNAP, we consider items purchased with CalFresh benefits as sales to the United States government, and those items are therefore exempt from tax in California.

And:

Sales of eligible food items purchased with CalFresh benefits are exempt from tax, even if the sale of the food item is normally taxable. For example, the sales of carbonated beverages, ice, and food coloring are exempt from tax when purchased with CalFresh benefit

So if you're somewhere within, say, San Luis Obispo city where the sales tax rate is 8.75%, then that brings the $2.03 up to $2.21 if bought without CalFresh, since both sales tax and CRV apply, and CRV is itself taxable. But on CalFresh, neither sales tax nor CRV apply, so the total would just be $1.98.

This all appears to align with your observations.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Anyway, the rates that you described is not correct. The current rates are:

In my defense, I am going by what is printed on the can itself. It says ten cents for CA, and 5 cents for ME, VT, MA, NY, HI, and IA. And this is the 16oz one, too. :/

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Overstating the tax and then being charged less, that's going to be less jarring to consumers than the opposite situation, where people are charged more than what it says on the can haha. They emboss cans with the worst-case tax rate because the tops are produced separately from the body of the can, so they genuinely don't know what size of can it will be part of.

But I get it: taxes are hard, since even the supposed simplicity of a "flat tax" rate still requires exemptions and exceptions everywhere. Otherwise, people will get away with paying less tax than they ought, or more tax than is reasonably fair, or that the purpose of the tax is wholly defeated.

Taxation systems: simple to administer, easy to understand, fair. Pick at most two. Anyone who says they've come up with a system that achieves all three perfectly is a liar or doesn't understand how taxes work.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

tar'ge charges a soda can tax, while WF does not. eventhough are buying Sparkling water, and not SODA.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is there sweetened drink tax?

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if a ready-to-drink beverage counted as prepared food.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not afaik. There used to be both regular sales tax and a "snack tax" on things like soda, candy and chips but that was nixed when I was still in school and not that far after sales tax on packaged food items was dropped.

And these taxes I am being charged on the soda are not being added everywhere I shop. Which is what makes me suspicious.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Ah! IDK if it's legal in CA but here in Chicago many small businesses used to charge the credit card fees to the customer. That was made illegal a year or so ago, so those stores switched to charging 4% higher prices but offering a 4% discount for cash.

If it's not every store, they might be charging you that CC processing fee.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 0 points 1 week ago

!askusa@discuss.online

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

https://www.drinknos.com/en-us/products/original/

Had to look that stuff up. Yuck, stay away!