I think this is a higher percentage than Windows 11 if you include 16-bit ones from the 90s and early 2000s. (What was wrong with NTVDM64, anyway?)
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
815 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
76646 readers
3143 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Which I'm sure is much higher than windows games working on windows. Proton is awesome for old games.
Okay, real talk.
I know there's probably 100 videos on this, but I don't have time to watch any of them right now...
How much performance is lost/gained from using Linux to play games via proton?
I'm certain any game with a native Linux version will work great, I'm mostly concerned with the ones that need some kind of emulation layer.
colloquially, I hear "5-10% overhead depending on the game and if you're running mods"
On the other hand, some testing has found that running games on Linux with Proton is actually faster than with Windows on the same hardware, because Windows is such a resource hog.
The hardware in in this test being the Legion Go steamdeck rival.
As I had an older pc this was true most of the time
See, that's what I was thinking. I'll have to do more research, but I would think all the overhead from Windows being Windows, would kind of diminish the gap between running it natively on Windows, and using proton or something so you can run it on Linux.
The overhead on both should be fairly similar, though with how Windows is, it wouldn't surprise me if it was slower.
I guess the beefier your system is the less you will notice the impact of a greedy OS (because thats a fixed/absolute overhead) while the performance hit of having to translate directx through Proton will always be there (because that's a percent-based overhead for each rendered frame)
So for the most top-end rigs, probably still Windows will squeeze a few more FPS. But it's close.
At the end of the day Linux and Windows are both pretty comparable for gaming performance, so we shouldn't worry about that as a deciding factor in which OS to choose, and can decide based on other merits.
Even if there is a slight performance loss, I feel like for the vast majority of games it's basically irrelevant, especially since most of the examples I see are like maybe 5-15% worse if it's worse at all.
If you are still over 60FPS then I don't really see why it's that much of an issue. Even having 165hz monitors I don't really notice much difference above 100, as long as the frame rate is consistent.
And as far as I've seen for AMD performance will be equal to if not better than Windows. The only issues I've seen with performance are Nvidia, but it's been improving and seems to be "good enough" from what I hear. Also, the more people who switch the more likely that will improve even more.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Switching to linux had me cold turkey league of legends im a healthier happier person now.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Most stuff works outside of system anti-cheatl level multiplayer and some visual novels that can be tough to setup sometimes.
Unfortunately those pesky live service games that have the most player counts are disproportionately represented in that 10%.
They tend to require installing a rootkit on your own computer. I wouldn't buy them even if they did support Linux.
Single player games are where I'm at so this really doesn't affect me
load more comments
(3 replies)
The correlation between people playing those games and not giving a fuck about digital privacy is probably huge.
The only game I couldn't get to run on Wine was NOLF 1. Everything works except the music, which relies on DirectPlay / DirectMusic.
Maybe try protontricks. You can add the libraries needed for directmusic to the game that way. Worked for me this way for gothic.
The stereotype is of the haughty Linux user, but fuck me all I ever see in these discussions is Windows users being belittling assholes.
We tend to come off as haughty when Windows users show up demanding help and being insulting while having put in zero work on understanding their own problem.
I've seen so many Windows users come out of nowhere to shit on Linux when gaming comes up. There was the whole thing where a bunch of alpha testers got banned on Ashes of Creation a few weeks ago and the discord just had like half of people in their discord throwing hate around.
Also accusing Linux users of being cheaters... as if game cheats are made for Linux.
I would love to swap to Linux if we could get games with kernel level anti cheat to be compatible.
I'd love for those games to be on Linux if they remove the spyware.
I'm gonna be that guy, most of them are in some way or another. The devs literally decided to not bother pressing the button that enables compatibility because they don't feel like it.
Even Starcraft???
view more: next ›