this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
175 points (97.8% liked)

Europe

8180 readers
527 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The Guardian has been told the board member that “led the charge” over the letter’s claims was Robbie Gibb, Theresa May’s former communications chief who also helped to found the rightwing news channel GB News.(..)

But many say the events of the past week also have to be seen in the context of a wider political effort to shift the BBC’s reporting to the right on key issues.(..)"

Note: apperantly this is what the Guardian was told by BBC insiders, so I marked this as [Opinion].

alt source Reuters

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

to shift the BBC’s reporting to the right on key issues

Correction: "to shift the BBC's reporting more to the right on key issues.

Buckle up UK, you're in for more of the American ride.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Same thing has been happening in Australia.

Murdoch's organisations (nearly all the newspapers & TV) take every opportunity to criticise and attack the ABC (Australia's public broadcaster, equivalent to the BBC). The constant claim is that they are biased and left wing, even though a number of studies have shown that their reporting is neutral.

The last couple of Chairman of the ABC have been ex-Murdoch employees. So they are now being attacked from inside as well. Cuts have been made to news, current affairs and investigative journalism shows.

I wouldn't be surprised if they sold off Bluey.

[–] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Same thing happening here in Canada with the CBC and the Conservatives.

Seems to catch on with 5 certain companies, housing issues, healthcare issues, too much immigration issues, etc.

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But how can the BBC deny the genocide they facilitated any harder

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Lies, uh, find a way

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

alt source Reuters:

" Supporters of the broadcaster, including journalists at the Guardian and the Financial Times, and some BBC staff, believe there was an orchestrated right-wing campaign to undermine the corporation, according to public statements."

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Did the misleading video not happen as claimed? The articles I read about it sounded pretty damning that they were intentionally edited to be misleading

Edit: To whoever is downvoting me, it would be more productive if you actually provided relevant information instead

[–] Tarogar@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As stated on Reuters about that:

"The most serious was the revelation that a Panorama documentary aired just before the November 2024 U.S. presidential election had spliced together two parts of a Trump speech so he appeared to be encouraging the Capitol Hill riot of January 6, 2021. The documentary was made by an independent production company."

So there's a few things at play here from what I can tell.

  1. The splice is real (?) And was produced by a third party and not the BBC itself.
  2. A splice is not exactly the fine British way of doing things. (Okay, I give them that, a splice shouldn't be needed to get a point across)
  3. The thing the documentary was getting at, in other words that the orange did in fact encourage violence should the election go how it went in 2020, still holds true. Spliced video or not.

Is it a journalistic foul? Yes.

Do the facts presented hold up even if shown in a less honest way? Yes.

So the outrage is about less honest use of media, you know... The thing the far right is doing all the time. Rules for thee but not me and all that. Just another day in the playbook for the far right.

[–] jumper@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We absolutely must have standards that are higher and better than the far right. They are not what we want to compare with. This splice edit is fuel for the arguments of the far right. Shit like this is to be avoided.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

I was kinda hoping that a personal note within the point that it was spliced was clear enough that we need to do better than them. Alas, here i am agreeing that we need higher standards than the far right. And that it was a dumb move given that there were plenty of other things they could have done. Like showing a collage of his twitter posts that were obvious.

In either way, that train left for now, we can just hope that other people in that business learn from that and that they don't repeat that mistake.