this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7777 readers
532 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/5697622

Archived version

Chinese intelligence officers attempted to recruit “thousands” of people linked to Westminster in a vast online operation that specifically targeted the “weak underbelly of parliament”, Whitehall sources have said.

Officials believe the agents used two recruitment “headhunters”, Amanda Qiu and Shirly Shen, to contact parliamentary staff, advisers and policy specialists as part of a “scattergun” effort o identify people with access to sensitive political information. The pair were highlighted, sources said, because they were allegedly the most prolific among a wider group of Chinese intelligence assets still operating.

“They kissed a lot of frogs,” one Whitehall source said. “This was a widespread scattergun targeting. They certainly sent out thousands of approaches. Some of it was dismissed as spam but it was an effort spread far and wide. They only need one out of hundreds to respond; that’s a win for them.”

...

MI5 told MPs and peers that China was offering “large financial incentives for seemingly low-level information” as a way of building relationships and encouraging targets to provide “non-public sensitive information”. Those approached included advisers to former Conservative ministers, including an ex-chancellor, advisers to Labour ministers, officials and researchers at several think tanks, among them the Tony Blair Institute.

The agency said China was attempting to “cultivate” people who were “one step removed” from high-priority parliamentary figures, and urged MPs to be wary of “unusual questions” from colleagues or contacts that might indicate intelligence-gathering.

...

Ordinary Britons should also be cautious about unsolicited online contact from potential Chinese intelligence operatives, the defence minister said.

...

In a letter to MPs, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, said it was of the “utmost importance” that everyone working in parliament understood “how this activity happens and how to protect ourselves against it”. Chinese state entities, he said, were “relentless” in seeking to influence Westminster.

Qiu, chief executive of BR-YR Executive Search, and Shen, co-founder of the Internship Union, have been identified by MI5 as operating LinkedIn accounts used by the Ministry of State Security to “conduct outreach at scale”. Officials believe the pair were specifically tasked with approaching people working in parliament, while other Chinese operatives are deployed against academics, the military, scientific institutions and private industry.

...

Among those contacted was a staff member in the office of Neil O’Brien, the Conservative MP and head of policy for Kemi Badenoch, who has been sanctioned by Beijing. The aide received a message from Shen offering remote consultancy work and praising them as an “excellent candidate”. James Price, a former special adviser to Nadhim Zahawi when he was chancellor, received a similar unsolicited approach framed as a “professional headhunting” opportunity. Both ignored the messages.

...

In September the case collapsed against two men accused of spying for China, Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry, in which prosecutors alleged they had passed information to Beijing. The pair deny wrongdoing.

The National Protective Security Authority, part of MI5, said last month that Chinese agents were posting fake job adverts online to lure British professionals into handing over secret material. Thousands had already been identified.

...

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

If they are doing it in the UK, they are also doing it in all other european countries

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

If Europe isn't China's enemy, why does it treat it as an enemy?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, what does that say about the state of politics not only in Britain but most "Western" countries? That there is such high potential for corruption? Does it mean they don't get paid enough? Or does it mean that they are essentially interested in the wrong things, namely money and pretty ladies they aren't married to?

Another thing in the article worries me: it seems unclear if this sharing of information is entirely illegal or if there's a gradient instead of a sharp border.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

That there is such high potential for corruption? Does it mean they don't get paid enough? Or does it mean that they are essentially interested in the wrong things, namely money and pretty ladies they aren't married to?

It would mean something if many of them would choose to do businss with chinese spies. It would mean something if secret service would keep this a secret. But what happened so far doesn't say much about the state of politics of "western" (?) countries. The only thing this news really says something about, is about what China is willing to so get information that is not publicly available to them.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

I'd let her spy on me, which I guess is the point.

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Because we don't do that over there at all do we