this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
628 points (96.9% liked)

World News

51034 readers
1894 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

The vote coincided with the international day for the elimination of violence against women, a day designated by the U.N. General Assembly.

The law won bipartisan support from the center-right majority and the center-left opposition in the final vote in the Lower Chamber, passing with 237 votes in favor.

The law, backed by the conservative government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy. It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gbzm@piefed.social 230 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (29 children)

People here seem weirdly confused about the term "feminicide": it means homicide motivated by misogyny. It's a subset of hate crimes.

They exist in all western societies I'm aware of, if you're confused it's probably only because you're unused to thinking of women as a protected class and hate for women as aggravating circumstances, the way hate for any race of religion is in most legal systems.

Yes they're 50% of the population, but also yes they're disproportionately the targets of violence because misogyny exists. Yet they are rarely treated as such in many legal systems.

[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 87 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Genuinely thought it just meant killing a woman and was confused

[–] daizelkrns@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does get misused in that exact way sometimes. I'm from Mexico, these cases have been making big headlines here for a while now, some prosecutors are misclassifying cases as femicide to grab attention to their political careers.

Local one a couple of years ago where a dude ran over a woman. Local prosecutor was pushing for femicide, fortunately it was moved to manslaughter as it should have been from the start. Not everything constitutes a hate crime and cases like that (in my opinion at least) would make the distinction meaningless

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 43 points 1 week ago (52 children)

It seems weird to consider half the people as "protected class". But only one gender. Dunno why they didn't just make hate crime the charge and make misogyny fall under that

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (21 children)

They're a protected class because they're singled out for violence because of their class. And it's a real world problem not a logic quiz. Misogyny and misandry are not equivalent in reality the way they are in the dictionary.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (48 children)

Does that make hate crime murder against men less worth prosecuting as such? Why shouldn't the legal definition be symmetrical?

load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would assume the thinking is centered around wanting to draw specific attention to the issue. And to more clearly cite it as a unique thing for awareness purposes.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This. The goal is to send a message. Over half the women killed were murdered by intimate partners. Such a crime would already be punished by life imprisonment for Aggravated Homicide.

However femicide also includes refusal for emotional relationship, or resistance to limiting her freedom as motivators, as admissible motives for femicide.

https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/20211564_mh0421097enn_pdf_0.pdf

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

"Let's slap a bandaid instead of fixing the underlying societal problems causing this and score some popularity points" - every politician ever.

Edit: okay maybe there are a few smart politicians, but they're not scoring the popularity points with this:

“Italy is one of only seven countries in Europe where sex and relationship education is not yet compulsory in schools, and we are calling for it to be compulsory in all school cycles,” said the head of Italy’s Democratic Party, Elly Schlein. “Repression is not enough without prevention, which can only start in schools.”

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

A lot of people in here seem upset for some reason.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

It's actually pretty sad. Kinda scary to.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure threads like this are why there aren’t more women on Lemmy..

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Does this imply that previously killing women wasn't criminal in Italy?

I presume that femicide is a subset of "homicide", but I can't tell if it means "any killing of a woman", "any killing of a woman by a man", "any killing of a woman because she's a woman", or "any killing of a woman by a man because she's a woman".

And I shudder to imagine how trans-women and trans-men fit into this weirdly sexist label.

(In America we have nice gender-neutral crimes, with enhancers if it was done out of prejudicial hate.)

[–] gbzm@piefed.social 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It means the murder of a woman motivated by misogyny. It is a subset of homicide and also a subset of hate crimes. It can be thought of as recognizing misogyny as a motive of hate and thus an aggravating circumstance to a homicide, and women as a protected class. Killing a trans woman or a trans man could very well get a "transphobia" label for a double hate crime, depending on the motives that get established. This is not as complicated as you seem to believe.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (15 children)

It's not complicated, it's just sexist and not explained in the linked article.

If a man kills a woman out of hatred for women that's a terrible crime and should be severely punished. But if a woman kills a man out of hatred for men, that is exactly as horrific a crime and should be punished no less severely.

Sexism in law benefits nobody.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (10 children)

It isn't sexism in law. Laws are written in blood. If women are frequently being killed because they refused sex or a relationship, then a law should exist as a deterrent. It isn't just "killing a woman because they hate women," it's specifically in cases where women are stalked, harassed, or pursued non-consensually for sex or a relationship. If women were targeting men in the same way, a law should exist in that case as well. That isn't the case, though. Women are VASTLY disproportionately killed by men for reasons pertaining to sex and relationships compared to the other way around.

Italy sees a problem: women are being frequently killed by intimate partners, stalkers, and harassers specifically because of their gender. They made a law to deter that. If the opposite problem presents itself they should do the same.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Since when have stronger punishments deterred crimes?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago

Also isn't killing a person based on an immutable characteristic (race, sex, etc) already a hate crime? In the US if someone kills a woman or girl primarily because of their sex that is a hate crime on top of being first degree murder (which is a serious enough offense as it is).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Yea… I’m with the incels that don’t really understand the point. If murder was already a crime that would be punished by life in prison, narrowing the specificity of who was murdered doesn’t change much of anything.

“Cool, if it makes you happy I guess 👍”

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn

Read?

[–] DoctorPress@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

Neither stalking nor revenge porn should count as gender-based violence. It is gender violence if it's strictly based on because of someone's gender with no other motivation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)

There needs to be more accountability for law enforcement for this too have any real effect. Studies show up to 40% of law enforcement self identify as domestic abusers. So why would they investigate themselves?

load more comments (8 replies)

♡ step in the right direction ♡

[–] DishonestBirb@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (10 children)

This is confusing. So killing a woman is now criminally worse than killing a man? That seems absurd.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (9 children)

"Hate crime" exists in the US with pretty much the same logic.

The law... comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy.

"Targeting" being the keyword here

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I don't see how the femicide part makes any sense or difference. There were already the exact same punishments for killing of anyone, so isn't this essentially copy pasting existing laws but with a specific group highlight? If that's the case, it will do absolutely nothing.

The second part is fine, though I hope it's meant for everyone and not just women. I don't know about Italy specifically, but in many European countries if you fall victim to these crimes as a man, you'll likely receive no help.

Would be great to see some more protections for everyone, as well as more serious punishments for violations against anyone. Making anything like this gender-specific will just fuel already problematic anti-other-gender sentiment.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›