this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

56775 readers
568 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

I will stick with .lan

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
CA (SSL) Certificate Authority
DNS Domain Name Service/System
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
HTTPS HTTP over SSL
IP Internet Protocol
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
TLS Transport Layer Security, supersedes SSL
VPN Virtual Private Network

6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 6 acronyms.

[Thread #910 for this sub, first seen 8th Aug 2024, 09:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sorry. I chose .local and I'm sticking to it.

[–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I still haven't heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago

Mainly conflicts with mDNS. However it's shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

.local is already used by mDNS/Zeroconf.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You mean mDNS/Zeroconf are using a tld that was already being used.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Tell me you don't share a net with Macs without using those words.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I went with .home and so far the problems are within reason

[–] anytimesoon@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm using .home and have not had any issues. Would you mind sharing what problems you've come across so I know what to expect?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

The main problem I have is waking up in the middle of the night worrying that ICANN pulled some more stupid corrupt bullshit that only makes networking worse and breaks my config.

Just look elsewhere in this thread: someone thinks that using .honk as a joke is safe. But what about .horse? .baby? .barefoot? .cool? (I stopped scrolling through the list at this point but you can see how arbitrary and idiotic things have become.)

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would have been nice if they came up with something shorter like .lan.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] nethad@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You go to networking jail for that.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shit, let's hope the ICANN cops don't find me out then... I've been using it for years!

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

"I hereby sentence you to two years on your own VLAN with no gateway"

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why do I care what ICANN says I can do on my own network? It's my network, I do what I want.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Try using .com for your internal network and watch the problems arise. Their choice to reserve .internal helps people avoid fqdn collisions.

See also https://traintocode.com/stop-using-test-dot-com/

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well as long as the TLD isn't used by anyone it should work internally regardless of what ICANN says, especially if I add it to etc/hosts

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Sure, you can do whatever you want. You could even use non-rfc1918 addresses and nobody can stop you. It's just not always a great idea for your own network's functionality and security. You can use an unregistered TLD if you want, but it's worth knowing that when people and companies did that in the past, and the TLD was later registered, things didn't turn out well for them. You wouldn't expect .foo to be a TLD, right? And it wasn't, until it was.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago

German router and network products company AVM learned the hard way that this is a bad idea. They use fritz.box for their router interface page and it was great until tld .box became publicly available and somebody registered fritz.box.

Having a reserved local/internal only tld is really great to prevent such issues.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

The value of the DNS is that we all use the same one. You can declare independence, but you'd lose out on that value.