this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
228 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

18978 readers
1579 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago

Are they hiring?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Next headline: "IRS Agents receive scrutiny for buying an excess of facial tissues."

[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The large drums of lotion however didn't raise any suspicion.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's winter, the air is dry.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

That reminds me that I actually do need to go get more lotion.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Sweet gig if you can get it.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

For some professional reason, though, right? Uh, just because!

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

2nd paragraph:

The issue … is the interpretation of a restriction on the “no tax on tips” deduction passed as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act that says that tips earned for prostitution or “pornographic activity” are not eligible.

The 3rd paragraph goes on to explain:

The legislation didn’t offer much additional guidance, and the IRS has yet to issue any statements clarifying what exactly constitutes “pornographic activity,” leaving the taxing agency in a similar boat as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart when he endeavored to define “obscenity” in the 1964 case of Jacobellis v. Ohio: “I know it when I see it.”

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 2 weeks ago

I know it when I see it.

Just because. 😎

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh come on, it's just the tip!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Party of governmental efficiency!

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Now I know what (who) Big Beautiful Bill was referencing

[–] pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Having never used OF, I assumed it was a pay to access content model, I guess they additionally allow tipping, which isn't a surprise, I assume there's also a pay for specific content creation model. But what I don't know is if the tipping, while linked to a creator, is linked to a specific piece of content. If it isn't, wouldn't a creator with any amount of mixed content be hard to evaluate? You couldn't prove the tipping was related to an excluded category in that case.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Almost like the "Big Beautiful Bill's" language wasn't very well thought out.

I mean, why exclude this random subsection of work in the first place.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, you can tip on individual posts.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

OnlyFans has steadfastly maintained that it is not explicitly a pornographic site. I imagine if a ruling went out that every tipped interaction on the site was considered pornography, they would step in on behalf of the content creators to try to whittle that down to case-by-case rulings, for no other reason than PR alone.

Tipping into the silly now…

I can’t wait until someone issues a FOIA for the deliberations over whether certain things are pornographic or not.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember when OF banned porn in 2021? 😆

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

That lasted longer than I thought it would. It took what, a week for them to cave?

[–] kyonshi@piefed.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

That might take some time. And a lot of agents. To... you know... review footage. A few times a day maybe.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How do I apply to the IRS? HOW DO I APPLY TO THE IRS?!

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do I have to be a U.S. citizen?

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You have to be eligible to work in the US.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

Wild to see my hard-earned tax money's going to people who are paid to watch porn.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago

Hell, I'll do this for free.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Hell yes this what the Internal Revenue Service is for. Micro managing people trying to sell images of their bodies and not the Billionaires selling images of other's bodies, marketing and stuff. Let's use are resources to investigate the rain drop and not the fucking hurricane good job agents! /s

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah boss, I'm gonna need to expense these tissues and this gallon of lotion.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet the boss of those agents will be all too happy to walk back and forth between cubicles. You know, for moral support

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

But the 'm' is silent? (I'm pretty sure I read that somewhere)