this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
61 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

8083 readers
1373 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No way, they just want their old sweet thatcher deal back and we'll be stuck with their attitude as they used to. They will probably also try pushing their palantir connections into the EU and other USA Agendas!

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they just want their old sweet thatcher deal back

Is anyone actually saying that? I think everyone knows the UK has fallen out the trapdoor and would probably need to enter as a regular member without the past special conditions.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some british politicians and civil society. Yes

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some used to, but not since the UK finally left, surely? Got any links, quotes? I'd like to see who's being mad.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I didnt record the pub me and my boyfriend went to. But it was in portsmouth

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And what politicians or civil society organisations were in the pub with you?

Ordinary people in pubs talking mad nonsense is not exactly unusual anywhere!

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Politicians that was from parliaments. And no i dont know in which statements -.-

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

ok, cool. You can search our parliaments at TheyWorkForYou.com and I don't think any have said that sort of nonsense for a few years.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Personally I rather they don't bother. I don't feel like hearing their dumb bitching and whining again for years to come. They wanted out, so stay out. We'll talk again in 30 years.or so.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 6 points 6 days ago

I think that we, as EU, should just not care about it. They want, good, they follow our rules. They don't want, still good, the still have to follow out rules to sell something in EU. I don't see the problem here

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With a customs union they can bitch all they want, they won't have a vote or any say on European policies.
Personally I'd like for EU and UK to cooperate more instead of less. Cooperation creates progress. We can see how ending cooperation is harmful on both sides both with Brexit and with Trump.

But UK can never get their former status back in EU. Not even in 30 years.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If they want in a customs union with the EU. they can join the EAA. No need to treat them like they are anything special.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I'm guessing you mean EEA. And Norway has very specifically stated that they have no interest to be tied in with UK, and why shouldn't UK be able to have their own deal like Switzerland?

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They didn't want out. Putin wanted them out and found willing recipients of his money in Gill, Farage and friends. Combine that with a jolly hockey sticks Old Etonian leader who didn't put any real punishments for lying in the referendum laws and Vlad's your uncle.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They didn’t want out. Putin wanted them out

Putin managed to topple the US, GB and is about to topple F and D soon. How can that be true? The intelligence agencies can't be that bad and the media not that cheap to buy.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

agencies can't be that bad

They are worse

the media not that cheap to buy.

It's even cheaper

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

But then the FSB, KGB would be the exception. How?

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

FSB is as inept and stupid as everyone else is. The US wasn't even brought down by the proper agency, it was like 10 rich deeply insane Russians and couple dozen of students who know a bit of python and a bit of English.
US society was barely held together by the assumption that everyone else shares your craziness, and was absolutely, totally unprepared for the possibility that someone will lie on the internet.
To be honest, it's more or a human condition overall, you need to have very specific training and education to even attempt to resist it, that's why LLM has this tight of a grip on stupidiest members of humanity

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

it was like 10 rich deeply insane Russians and couple dozen of students

How come the US can still defend against any political movement that comes from within?

To be honest, it’s more or a human condition overall, you need to have very specific training and education to even attempt to resist it

Can you elaborate a bit, please? I don't understand this.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I always found that to be a cheap cop-out. It's your vote, so your responsibility to check the information you get. If you're not willing to do that, you shouldn't be voting.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

You are not immune to propaganda

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

Maybe, but voters get used to normal elections where we do have some protections against outright lies, as the likes of Phil Woolas have discovered, and against elected politicians being paid mouthpieces, as Neil Hamilton and now Nathan Gill have found. We'll never know why Piggy Cameron did not include better protection against lying in the referendum laws.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It'll be months upon months of the British parliament trying to have their cake and eat it, too, all over again. Maybe also a couple of votes rejecting "No deal", while not accepting any deal, of course.

Brexit, the gift that keeps on giving.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

Most of the idiot MPs who did that last time have been booted out now and almost all the rest will go next time.

The trouble is that it looks like we may get a bunch of Russian-backed isolationists in their place, unless the Gill scandal gets some proper coverage in the press.